Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

I think, if I read this right, the real point is that previous SCOTUS decisions on the question of who may marry were left to the states...


11 posted on 01/17/2015 11:00:53 AM PST by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlueNgold

yes probably correct but that was when supremes didn’t ajudiacte they followed the constitution


19 posted on 01/17/2015 11:04:37 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold

Correct.

And from a case in New York in 2014, where a marriage had taken place between an uncle and a niece, it was appealed to a Federal court, who then ASKED THE HIGHEST NEW YORK COURT TO LOOK AT THE ISSUE!

The New York supreme court then reviewed the rulings and decisions and decided the marriage was a true marriage.

Case closed.


24 posted on 01/17/2015 11:09:23 AM PST by djf (OK. Well, now, lemme try to make this clear: If you LIKE your lasagna, you can KEEP your lasagna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson