Posted on 01/09/2015 11:06:50 AM PST by Politically Correct
So, a little review for those of you who may be new.
1. Islam is a political system, NOT a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and STOPS referring to it as a religion, there is no hope. Islam is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below. The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning much like Mormonism and Scientology a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.
Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:
Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die. Osama Bin Laden
(The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 42)
Definition of suzerainty: a situation in which a region or people is a compulsory tributary to a more powerful entity, which controls its foreign affairs while allowing the tributary vassal state internal autonomy.
Please note that the quote above makes perfectly clear that islam DOES NOT CARE IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF THEIR FAUX-RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT OR NOT BECAUSE THATS NOT THE POINT. All that matters is EARTHLY submission and control of landmass. All of that five-times-per-day sticking ones butt in the air while some bisexual shrieks about a non-existent pagan moon deity over a loudspeaker is not prayer. It is an outward sign of submission to the musloid political system. NOTHING more. Its a gang signal. Its a salute.
Islam isnt about allah or paradise or prayer or spirituality or how human beings should relate to one another or how human beings should relate to a god or the eternal fate of the human soul. THEY DONT CARE ABOUT ANY OF THAT. Islam is about acquiring physical, earthly territory and installing a totalitarian government over the earth that provides a cadre of elites masquerading as some sort of clergy with massive decadent wealth and as much twisted perverted sex as they want, including homosexual and heterosexual pedohilia, ephebophilia, concubinage, incest, bestiality and necrophilia. There is nothing new under the sun. They want power, they want money and they want sex. The religious aspects are a stone-cold con, which Bin Laden himself declared in no uncertain terms.
2. They cant be reasoned with. They cant be dialogued with. There is no such thing as radical islam. There is islam, which is even more bloodthirsty, conscienceless and perverse than what we are seeing today. We cannot possibly imagine what they would do if given true carte-blanche. Islam today is like an eleven year old boy just BARELY on the cusp of puberty, just BEGINNING to test the waters. These beheadings, rapes, suicide attacks and terror operations are BUSH LEAGUE. Just as it is nonsensical and depraved to refer to Nazis as radical Nazis and moderate Nazis as if ANY Nazism could ever be considered acceptable, so it is with islam. This is why Egyptian president Sisis recent speech calling for a reformation of islam is nonsense. All Sisis speech did was confirm that Sisi himself doesnt actually believe any of it, and instead of doing the morally correct thing and renouncing islam, Sisi wants to have his pancakes and eat them too. He wants everyone like him to subscribe to and associate themselves with something that they dont actually believe in or take seriously. (How very Pope Francis of him.) Well, you can pour maple syrup on a puddle of bloody, diarrhetic hogshit all you want, but it will never, ever be pancakes.
3. Just to be sure that the info is out there as much as possible, here is the offensive mohammed cartoon, followed by a link to a cartoon published a while back by the same magazine depicting the Holy Trinity in retaliation for the Church reiterating that sodomite marriage was an ontological impossibility, and that the farce of gay marriage was a grave evil. I cant post the cartoon of the Trinity because I just cant. But I will describe it, and then you can decide whether you want to look at it or not. God the Father is on the left, depicted as a grey, bearded man, glassy-eyed, mouth open, tongue hanging out like a dog, bending over at the waist being sodomized by God the Son, also glassy-eyed, wearing the crown of thorns, holes visible in His hands and feet, who is in turn being sodomized by the Holy Spirit, depicted as the triangle with the all-seeing eye in the center. Here it is.
The picture of mohammed below says, 100 lashes if you dont die laughing!
Thats it. Thats all.
So people like islam-appeaser Bill Donohue who argue that islam was provoked would only have a rhetorical leg to stand and a feeble one at that only if any other Christian anywhere had responded to the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the Trinity in any way other than praying for the conversion and salvation of the Charlie Hebdo staff and readership. If you pray the rosary, you do just that many times per day.
O My Jesus, forgive us our sins. Save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to heaven, especially those in most need of Thy Mercy.
4. I see that there have been many protest marches and gatherings in France wherein people are holding up signs saying, Je suis Charlie. I am Charlie. Um, Im not Charlie. These people were not the pillars of society or role models, as evidenced by their pro-sodomite blasphemy linked above. Satan frequently uses these multi-vectored attacks because one has to be able to process multiple datasets simultaneously AND identify and maintain the connections (and disconnections) between them. And, as we have discussed before, modern western man has been so dumbed-down and contra-educated that holding ONE premise and following a single-track logical progression is nearly impossible for most people today. In this case, we have to juggle multiple subjects and then tease out the truth and the morally upright position and reaction. Lets see if we can do it.
A.) These people did not deserve to be murdered. Obviously.
B.) They are not martyr saints.
C.) Freedom of speech is not a god unto itself. Only God is God, and His rights trump ours. Americans, in particular, have a tendency to worship the Constitution and the American governmental paradigm, particularly with regard to the rights of man over and above God. Careful with that. Its a very slippery slope.
D.) The issue here is islam, and the fault, blame and culpability for these murders lies squarely in the lap of islam and nowhere else. No excuses can be made, no justification can be fabricated, no quarter can be given. Islam cares not a whit about our arguments amongst ourselves regarding freedom of speech or anything else. All islam cares about is complete earthly submission to islam, and it will happily let us argue amongst ourselves while it slaughters us where we sit.
5. Id like to mention briefly the fact that a woman let the gunmen into the building, knowing exactly who and what they were and what they were going to do. Apparently she was scared, and the gunmen told her they were not going to kill her and they didnt.
I think that level of cowardice she displayed in that situation is criminal and should be prosecutable as involuntary manslaughter. Here are the criteria for Involuntary Manslaughter:
a. Someone was killed as a result of act by the defendant. Check.
b. The act either was inherently dangerous to others or done with reckless disregard for human life. Check.
c. The defendant knew or should have known his or her conduct was a threat to the lives of others. Check.
But then, are we surprised that a person associated with this magazine was lacking in the moral virtue of courage? Again, be very careful about enthusiastically attaching yourself to these magazine people as heroes or role models. See the big picture without being pulled down into the weeds.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized on January 8, ARSH 2015.
Seriously...and you have the luxury of being a common tator.
not to pass on the danger to another.
You see all these polls about how ole BJ is the “most popular Democrat” but the guy was absolutely toxic last fall. I think almost every candidate he campaigned with lost.
I think the “most popular” deal is an MSM illusion. I’ve heard Chels is begging her parents to stay home when she starts running for office.
I would have let them in. In a heartbeat. Are you kidding me? When muzzies are pointing a gun at my baby’s head and the choice is buzz them in or watch my child die - then HELL YES!
But look at papertyger and post 47. He is ready to put her in jail for letting them in.
Even worse - he would be willing to let them kill his child.
That is a naive statement. That political system IS their religion. At it's head is a false god with it's prophet Mohamed.
Good questions
I just can’t understand your thought process. Are you trying to be noble?
Pay-acting at being God so as to sacrifice your child so that others might live?
Not trying to be rude or insulting, really. I just can’t believe you value your child’s life that little so as to appease a terrorist.
“The future belongs ONLY to those who slander the false prophet of Islam” - Jesus (John 14:6)
Working for Obdunga..too!!
✔ Well said.
Are different in Oklahoma.
We have CC....and quite a few of us are armed.
My head is generally on a swivel...and I know what's going on around me.
Two guy's running around with rifles...I think would have got my attention. To say the least....
Yes...having my young kid with me would be not good.
But being a Sheepdog....I would have acted.
I don't know you from Adam...but I will tell you this...I would die for you in a heartbeat. If the situation warranted it.
You are a woman...and men think differently. Grant that.
That all said....people panic. And don't want to die. I get that........too.
Wow!! What else are you going to say Jesus said?
Even worse - he would be willing to let them kill his child.
Over my dead body... Literally.
How many people would you condemn to save your baby?
I need to pick up a copy to take to the range so that it becomes the Holey Koran.
I don’t have time for a Bible Study...but read John 10-14. Then lets talk.
“This is a BAD IDEA.”
Got a better idea to deal with Islam?
(The following is not original with me. I do not have the original attribution.)
One of the ways to compare religions is by the norm and by the aberration. For example, Christ taught the following:
1. Love God above everything else.
2. God so loves you that he makes every attempt to create a personal, loving relationship with you
3. Love everyone else more than you love yourself.
4. Show mercy to each everyone.
5. Turn the other cheek.
6. Do unto others as you want them to do to you.
7. Recognize that in God’s eye’s everyone is equally a sinner and equally deserving of God’s mercy and love.
8. Convert people to Christianity by loving them and convincing them that God loves them and forgives them.
Christ did the following:
Forgave an adulteress by telling her accusers, “Let the person without sin throw the first stone.” And the men slowly left, first the older then the younger. Looking at the woman, Jesus asked, “Where are your accusers.” She answered, “There are none.” Then Jesus said, “Then I don’t accuse you either, go and sin no more.” [This is the amazing thing. Jesus did not deny that she had committed adultery. But while ordering her not to do that anymore, He also showered her with love and forgiveness.]
Christ’s disciples did this:
Told newly converted pagans, “Keep yourself from sexual sin and take care of the widows and orphans.” That was it, be faithful to your husbands and wives and take care of people who can’t take care of themselves. That’s it. No akillin’ the infidel.
That’s the norm. Here’s the aberrations:
1. Crusader Christians go to fight Muslims who are attacking them (Not supposed to engage in religious violence, you know, love and all)
2. Spanish Inquisition
3. Religious-based conquest by the Iberians (Portuguese and Spanish)including both the New World and the Indian sub-continent.
4. Post reformation Protestant / Catholic warfare
Here’s the norm for Islam:
Mohammed taught:
1. Live in submission and obedience to an impersonal god.
2. To be eligible for heaven, you must do the five pillars of Islam.
3. To be guaranteed to get to heaven, die while killing a non-Muslim.
4. Kill or subjugate every non-Muslim.
Mohammed did this:
Lied, broke treaties, had sex with 9 year old, and lead armies to kill and subjugate non-Muslims.
Mohammed’s disciples did this:
1. Assassinated (word comes from Islamic sect) several of Mohammed’s successors during power struggles after his death
2. Split the faith after the murder of Ali, one of Mohammed’s successors. Ali’s followers are known as Ali’s Partisans or Shi’Ali, or Shia. They fight the rest of Islam, called the Sunnis for the next 1300 years.
3. Spread their faith by military conquest
What’s the aberration?
1. Tolerance of other religions
2. Peace with non-Muslims
3. Mercy toward non-Muslims
I have no hope for an Islamic Reformation. The Roman Catholics had gone so far from the roots of the Christian faith that the Reformation sought to return the Church to those roots. Do we really want Islam to return to its roots?
I have yet to see any U.S. media source discuss how insulting the paper was to the Pope or Christians (the Holy Trinity having anal sex).
Or that last week’s FAMILY GUY joked over a cartoon of a dead Jesus that he’d died of cocaine overdose and anal sex.
Yet EVERY lib on HuffPo etc tries to equate Christianity to Islam.
Where are the dead bodies over BOOK OF MORMON or “Piss Christ”?
We’re on the brink of a European civil war where there’s going to be mass deportations or Europeans facing ISIS-style slaughter.
The problem you’re having is you are trying to frame the dilemma such that I am a machine rather than that you are a coward.
This is why your conclusions about me seem so unfathomable: they are.
Ahh, the truth is out.
I didn’t mean to back you into a corner. But there you are. Stuck.
Making conflicting and contradictory remarks. And like many who lose an argument - you resort to insults.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.