Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cut the Crap: The problem is islam, and it has to be exterminated. Period.
Barnhardt ^ | Jan 8, 2015 | Ann Barnhardt

Posted on 01/09/2015 11:06:50 AM PST by Politically Correct

So, a little review for those of you who may be new.

1. Islam is a political system, NOT a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and STOPS referring to it as a religion, there is no hope. Islam is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below. The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology – a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.

Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:

“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” –Osama Bin Laden
(The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 42)

Definition of suzerainty: a situation in which a region or people is a compulsory tributary to a more powerful entity, which controls its foreign affairs while allowing the tributary vassal state internal autonomy.

Please note that the quote above makes perfectly clear that islam DOES NOT CARE IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF THEIR FAUX-RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT OR NOT – BECAUSE THAT’S NOT THE POINT. All that matters is EARTHLY submission and control of landmass. All of that five-times-per-day sticking one’s butt in the air while some bisexual shrieks about a non-existent pagan moon deity over a loudspeaker is not “prayer”. It is an outward sign of submission to the musloid political system. NOTHING more. It’s a gang signal. It’s a salute.

Islam isn’t about “allah” or “paradise” or “prayer” or “spirituality” or how human beings should relate to one another or how human beings should relate to a “god” or the eternal fate of the human soul. THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THAT. Islam is about acquiring physical, earthly territory and installing a totalitarian government over the earth that provides a cadre of “elites” masquerading as some sort of “clergy” with massive decadent wealth and as much twisted perverted sex as they want, including homosexual and heterosexual pedohilia, ephebophilia, concubinage, incest, bestiality and necrophilia. There is nothing new under the sun. They want power, they want money and they want sex. The “religious” aspects are a stone-cold con, which Bin Laden himself declared in no uncertain terms.

2. They can’t be reasoned with. They can’t be dialogued with. There is no such thing as “radical islam”. There is islam, which is even more bloodthirsty, conscienceless and perverse than what we are seeing today. We cannot possibly imagine what they would do if given true carte-blanche. Islam today is like an eleven year old boy – just BARELY on the cusp of puberty, just BEGINNING to test the waters. These beheadings, rapes, suicide attacks and terror operations are BUSH LEAGUE. Just as it is nonsensical and depraved to refer to Nazis as “radical Nazis” and “moderate Nazis” – as if ANY Nazism could ever be considered acceptable, so it is with islam. This is why Egyptian president Sisi’s recent speech calling for a “reformation” of islam is nonsense. All Sisi’s speech did was confirm that Sisi himself doesn’t actually believe any of it, and instead of doing the morally correct thing and renouncing islam, Sisi wants to have his pancakes and eat them too. He wants everyone – like him – to subscribe to and associate themselves with something that they don’t actually believe in or take seriously. (How very Pope Francis of him.) Well, you can pour maple syrup on a puddle of bloody, diarrhetic hogshit all you want, but it will never, ever be pancakes.

3. Just to be sure that the info is out there as much as possible, here is the “offensive” mohammed cartoon, followed by a link to a cartoon published a while back by the same magazine depicting the Holy Trinity – in retaliation for the Church reiterating that sodomite “marriage” was an ontological impossibility, and that the farce of “gay marriage” was a grave evil. I can’t post the cartoon of the Trinity because I just can’t. But I will describe it, and then you can decide whether you want to look at it or not. God the Father is on the left, depicted as a grey, bearded man, glassy-eyed, mouth open, tongue hanging out like a dog, bending over at the waist being sodomized by God the Son, also glassy-eyed, wearing the crown of thorns, holes visible in His hands and feet, who is in turn being sodomized by the Holy Spirit, depicted as the triangle with the all-seeing eye in the center. Here it is.

The picture of mohammed below says, “100 lashes if you don’t die laughing!”

That’s it. That’s all.

So people like islam-appeaser Bill Donohue who argue that islam was “provoked” would only have a rhetorical leg to stand – and a feeble one at that – only if any other Christian anywhere had responded to the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the Trinity in any way other than praying for the conversion and salvation of the Charlie Hebdo staff and readership. If you pray the rosary, you do just that many times per day.

“O My Jesus, forgive us our sins. Save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to heaven, especially those in most need of Thy Mercy.”

4. I see that there have been many protest marches and gatherings in France wherein people are holding up signs saying, “Je suis Charlie.” “I am Charlie.” Um, I’m not Charlie. These people were not the pillars of society or role models, as evidenced by their pro-sodomite blasphemy linked above. Satan frequently uses these multi-vectored attacks because one has to be able to process multiple datasets simultaneously AND identify and maintain the connections (and disconnections) between them. And, as we have discussed before, modern western man has been so dumbed-down and contra-educated that holding ONE premise and following a single-track logical progression is nearly impossible for most people today. In this case, we have to juggle multiple subjects and then tease out the truth and the morally upright position and reaction. Let’s see if we can do it.

A.) These people did not deserve to be murdered. Obviously.

B.) They are not martyr saints.

C.) Freedom of speech is not a “god” unto itself. Only God is God, and His rights trump ours. Americans, in particular, have a tendency to worship the Constitution and the American governmental paradigm, particularly with regard to the “rights of man” over and above God. Careful with that. It’s a very slippery slope.

D.) The issue here is islam, and the fault, blame and culpability for these murders lies squarely in the lap of islam and nowhere else. No excuses can be made, no justification can be fabricated, no quarter can be given. Islam cares not a whit about our arguments amongst ourselves regarding freedom of speech or anything else. All islam cares about is complete earthly submission to islam, and it will happily let us argue amongst ourselves while it slaughters us where we sit.

5. I’d like to mention briefly the fact that a woman let the gunmen into the building, knowing exactly who and what they were and what they were going to do. Apparently she was scared, and the gunmen told her they were not going to kill her – and they didn’t.

I think that level of cowardice she displayed in that situation is criminal and should be prosecutable as involuntary manslaughter. Here are the criteria for Involuntary Manslaughter:

a. Someone was killed as a result of act by the defendant. Check.
b. The act either was inherently dangerous to others or done with reckless disregard for human life. Check.
c. The defendant knew or should have known his or her conduct was a threat to the lives of others. Check.

But then, are we surprised that a person associated with this magazine was lacking in the moral virtue of courage? Again, be very careful about enthusiastically attaching yourself to these magazine people as heroes or role models. See the big picture without being pulled down into the weeds.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on January 8, ARSH 2015.


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: annbarnhardt; barnhardt; islam; religion; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Let me ask you....what would have said and done?

Seriously...and you have the luxury of being a common tator.

61 posted on 01/09/2015 12:35:37 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Yes??? And so when a muzzie tells you to open that door or your child will be killed; your response is...

not to pass on the danger to another.

62 posted on 01/09/2015 12:38:00 PM PST by papertyger ("News" is what journalists want to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

You see all these polls about how ole BJ is the “most popular Democrat” but the guy was absolutely toxic last fall. I think almost every candidate he campaigned with lost.

I think the “most popular” deal is an MSM illusion. I’ve heard Chels is begging her parents to stay home when she starts running for office.


63 posted on 01/09/2015 12:38:45 PM PST by nascarnation (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange; papertyger

I would have let them in. In a heartbeat. Are you kidding me? When muzzies are pointing a gun at my baby’s head and the choice is buzz them in or watch my child die - then HELL YES!

But look at papertyger and post 47. He is ready to put her in jail for letting them in.

Even worse - he would be willing to let them kill his child.


64 posted on 01/09/2015 12:40:10 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Hi Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct
>>Islam is a political system, NOT a religion<<

That is a naive statement. That political system IS their religion. At it's head is a false god with it's prophet Mohamed.

65 posted on 01/09/2015 12:40:22 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtd

Good questions


66 posted on 01/09/2015 12:45:21 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

I just can’t understand your thought process. Are you trying to be noble?

Pay-acting at being God so as to sacrifice your child so that others might live?

Not trying to be rude or insulting, really. I just can’t believe you value your child’s life that little so as to appease a terrorist.


67 posted on 01/09/2015 12:45:26 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Hi Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“The future belongs ONLY to those who slander the false prophet of Islam” - Jesus (John 14:6)


68 posted on 01/09/2015 12:45:55 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Working for Obdunga..too!!


69 posted on 01/09/2015 12:46:18 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

✔ Well said.


70 posted on 01/09/2015 12:55:01 PM PST by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Well...things being in France.

Are different in Oklahoma.

We have CC....and quite a few of us are armed.

My head is generally on a swivel...and I know what's going on around me.

Two guy's running around with rifles...I think would have got my attention. To say the least....

Yes...having my young kid with me would be not good.

But being a Sheepdog....I would have acted.

I don't know you from Adam...but I will tell you this...I would die for you in a heartbeat. If the situation warranted it.

You are a woman...and men think differently. Grant that.

That all said....people panic. And don't want to die. I get that........too.

71 posted on 01/09/2015 12:58:29 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Wow!! What else are you going to say Jesus said?


72 posted on 01/09/2015 1:02:24 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I see your cowardice is of the shameless, craven, variety.

Even worse - he would be willing to let them kill his child.

Over my dead body... Literally.

How many people would you condemn to save your baby?

73 posted on 01/09/2015 1:06:04 PM PST by papertyger ("News" is what journalists want to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
the Koran

I need to pick up a copy to take to the range so that it becomes the Holey Koran.

74 posted on 01/09/2015 1:06:35 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

I don’t have time for a Bible Study...but read John 10-14. Then lets talk.


75 posted on 01/09/2015 1:07:43 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“This is a BAD IDEA.”

Got a better idea to deal with Islam?


76 posted on 01/09/2015 1:08:51 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

(The following is not original with me. I do not have the original attribution.)


One of the ways to compare religions is by the norm and by the aberration. For example, Christ taught the following:

1. Love God above everything else.
2. God so loves you that he makes every attempt to create a personal, loving relationship with you
3. Love everyone else more than you love yourself.
4. Show mercy to each everyone.
5. Turn the other cheek.
6. Do unto others as you want them to do to you.
7. Recognize that in God’s eye’s everyone is equally a sinner and equally deserving of God’s mercy and love.
8. Convert people to Christianity by loving them and convincing them that God loves them and forgives them.

Christ did the following:

Forgave an adulteress by telling her accusers, “Let the person without sin throw the first stone.” And the men slowly left, first the older then the younger. Looking at the woman, Jesus asked, “Where are your accusers.” She answered, “There are none.” Then Jesus said, “Then I don’t accuse you either, go and sin no more.” [This is the amazing thing. Jesus did not deny that she had committed adultery. But while ordering her not to do that anymore, He also showered her with love and forgiveness.]

Christ’s disciples did this:

Told newly converted pagans, “Keep yourself from sexual sin and take care of the widows and orphans.” That was it, be faithful to your husbands and wives and take care of people who can’t take care of themselves. That’s it. No akillin’ the infidel.

That’s the norm. Here’s the aberrations:

1. Crusader Christians go to fight Muslims who are attacking them (Not supposed to engage in religious violence, you know, love and all)
2. Spanish Inquisition
3. Religious-based conquest by the Iberians (Portuguese and Spanish)including both the New World and the Indian sub-continent.
4. Post reformation Protestant / Catholic warfare

Here’s the norm for Islam:

Mohammed taught:

1. Live in submission and obedience to an impersonal god.
2. To be eligible for heaven, you must do the five pillars of Islam.
3. To be guaranteed to get to heaven, die while killing a non-Muslim.
4. Kill or subjugate every non-Muslim.

Mohammed did this:

Lied, broke treaties, had sex with 9 year old, and lead armies to kill and subjugate non-Muslims.

Mohammed’s disciples did this:

1. Assassinated (word comes from Islamic sect) several of Mohammed’s successors during power struggles after his death
2. Split the faith after the murder of Ali, one of Mohammed’s successors. Ali’s followers are known as Ali’s Partisans or Shi’Ali, or Shia. They fight the rest of Islam, called the Sunnis for the next 1300 years.
3. Spread their faith by military conquest

What’s the aberration?

1. Tolerance of other religions
2. Peace with non-Muslims
3. Mercy toward non-Muslims

I have no hope for an Islamic Reformation. The Roman Catholics had gone so far from the roots of the Christian faith that the Reformation sought to return the Church to those roots. Do we really want Islam to return to its roots?


77 posted on 01/09/2015 1:08:55 PM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

I have yet to see any U.S. media source discuss how insulting the paper was to the Pope or Christians (the Holy Trinity having anal sex).

Or that last week’s FAMILY GUY joked over a cartoon of a dead Jesus that he’d died of cocaine overdose and anal sex.

Yet EVERY lib on HuffPo etc tries to equate Christianity to Islam.

Where are the dead bodies over BOOK OF MORMON or “Piss Christ”?

We’re on the brink of a European civil war where there’s going to be mass deportations or Europeans facing ISIS-style slaughter.


78 posted on 01/09/2015 1:09:11 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The problem you’re having is you are trying to frame the dilemma such that I am a machine rather than that you are a coward.

This is why your conclusions about me seem so unfathomable: they are.


79 posted on 01/09/2015 1:10:46 PM PST by papertyger ("News" is what journalists want to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Ahh, the truth is out.

I didn’t mean to back you into a corner. But there you are. Stuck.

Making conflicting and contradictory remarks. And like many who lose an argument - you resort to insults.


80 posted on 01/09/2015 1:11:28 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Hi Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson