Posted on 12/20/2014 7:21:12 PM PST by Steelfish
Turning their backs on De Blasio during press conference and accusing Bill de Blasio of having blood on his hands is a good start. But where's the action? Where are the marches?
Tonight!
Just read that DeBlasio said to the cops during his press conference, “We’re all in this together.”
“No, we’re not”, a cop answered tersely.
Holder has already announced he is resigning. Obama has named his replcaement.
Prediction...de Blasio is gone in a month...pressure will be huge on him recall will be threatened but he will step aside to save Obama.
BUMP
Everybody hates Bill de Blasio. Rudolph went to stop the sleigh at de Blasio’s house and Santa said, “Keep going. I hate this son-of-a-bitch. What kind of man makes up his own name and puts a ‘de’ in it?”
no. it will backfire when too many victims are injured or murdered.
plus they may have a no-strike clause.
The NYPD don’t need to strike to get their point across. They could keep working, and just ignore violent crime. The homies would ramp up their violence, and then the (unarmed) people would be screaming for Blasio’s head on a platter.
Yes, DiBumBum SHOULD step down: right off a scaffold. His asinine statements the other day definitely had a hand in the assassination of these two police officers.
-——Prediction...de Blasio is gone in a month...pressure will be huge on him recall will be threatened but he will step aside to save Obama.-——
Can I borrow some of the drugs you are ingesting....?
What you posted will never happen....and what he would save Obama from...?
They have a right ,under the Constitution to protest march
They do not have the right to advocate murder , or assisination, or arson, or criminal activity.
If he marches with them, and repeats their refrain and stays in the march advocating murder - he deserves the consequence !
He has the right of "free agency" to leave the head of the parade, at any time, if they call for criminal activity- but he chose not to leave.
Michael Browns step-father called to " Burn this B*tch down"
and then the arsons happened, and he should have been criminally responsible for his actions , behavior , and speech.
So shouldn't the River-runt Sharptongue !
I think the standard is “incitement to imminent lawless behavior” and may not cover incidents a week after the march.
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_492
Exactly. Not to mention that the perp was a Black Muslim - two of the three main marching groups...
Newly converted black muslim is really a black nationalist muslim AKA farrakans man, what say you screwy louis? The NYC jail system is choke full of these enemies
Should be, and is, are two entirely different things.
Actually if every PD struck at the same time, they would have no choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.