"Even with this snapshot, scientists can see that some of their existing models will have to be revised."
Not where you thought it would be then? I'm shocked....
1 posted on
12/19/2014 2:26:42 AM PST by
moose07
To: moose07
2 posted on
12/19/2014 2:27:27 AM PST by
moose07
( Santa's a Scotsman! Too many Pies ,not enough exercise ,of course he's one of us!)
To: moose07
What is really telling to me is the look of North America, particularly the US. On a better resolution map, one could probably overlay the CO2 concentrations along with the concentration of Democrats/Blue State, City, Counties and see a very high correlation.
3 posted on
12/19/2014 2:31:25 AM PST by
Gaffer
To: moose07
Yeah I thought “the science is settled!”
5 posted on
12/19/2014 2:43:54 AM PST by
JaguarXKE
(1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men d)
To: moose07
Are they trying to say that CO2 is a gas that is static? It doesn’t blend with the atmosphere and move with win current?
7 posted on
12/19/2014 2:47:44 AM PST by
raybbr
(Obamacare needs a death panel.)
To: moose07
Whoever controls the Carbon dioxide data, controls Earth.
12 posted on
12/19/2014 3:30:34 AM PST by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: moose07
It is possible to see spikes, too, on the eastern seaboard of the US
Considering the easterly flow of the wind, this could simply be a build up of all the Co2 that was blown across the country....
18 posted on
12/19/2014 4:05:54 AM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(“We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within.”)
To: moose07
Yeah, I noticed concentrations in those high industrial areas, Nova Scotia and Greenland. /s
28 posted on
12/19/2014 4:44:52 AM PST by
Vinnie
To: moose07
I think everyone should be careful about reading too much into this graph. While it certainly shows some interesting variations, look at the SCALE of the variation.
It's from 387 to 402.5 PPM. The high end of the scale is only 4% higher than the low end of the scale. And don't forget that is parts per million: so the difference between the high and low ends of the scale is only 15.5 parts per million.
Perhaps that is because the CO2 disperses relatively quickly. But, I'd prefer to see more data, to see if the variations remain constant.
31 posted on
12/19/2014 4:58:14 AM PST by
justlurking
(tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
To: moose07
Lol! Turns out the highest concentrations are coming from the Amazon Basin in Brazil!
I knew my “Pave the Rainforests” campaign was on the right track.
38 posted on
12/19/2014 5:49:34 AM PST by
IronJack
To: moose07
It is possible to see spikes, too, on the eastern seaboard of the US and over China. These probably include the additional emissions of CO2 that come from industrialization What spike over Eastern US?
And compared to China? What nut is trying to make this equivalence?
I don't think that the entire Eastern Seaboard puts out as much CO2 as that one volcano in Iceland.
47 posted on
12/19/2014 5:12:17 PM PST by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: moose07
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
