Posted on 12/17/2014 8:35:22 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
Heads up: there are fake Nikon D800E DSLRs floating around. Thats according to Nikon Europe, which posted a notice regarding fraudulent Nikon D800E digital SLR. Apparently some unscrupulous folk are taking the D800, replacing its outer shell with the D800E cover, and selling the fake cameras through online auction sites (presumably eBay).
(Excerpt) Read more at petapixel.com ...
astonishing!
Thank you
I shoot with Canons....pun intended!
out a my league,
have to stick to the ole Minolta 201 or my fav Mamiya 645
never looked at it that way is that how they came up with the name??
Sony is the way to go!
I didn’t think anyone could make a whole fake Nikon camera from scratch.....although you never know.
Canon 60D. Three years old.
Still clicking...
It is hard to kill one!
Does anyone remember which camera was on that commercial on TV that said “The camera so good, we shot this commercial with it”
There is only about $300.00 difference between the 800 and the 800E - doesn’t seem worth the trouble to counterfeit.
I’m doing some freelance pix for a local paper. I’m using the 18-135 zoom lens.
I’d like to trade this combo in for a 5D but B&H Camera will only give $400 for what I have on their $3,000 camera.
I had a Canon A540 that I absolutely loved. It made me look like I actually knew how to shoot. The only issue I had was the lens cover would hang up occasionally.
One day while cleaning it I grabbed the wrong solvent bottle and ruined the sensor.
I replaced it with a Powershot SX130IS. Decent enough camera, but my shots are nowhere near as good looking, even with the sizable increase in pixel #.
Any idea on what the difference could be?
the lens on any digital camera is almost as important and in some cases more important than the sensor quality.
I had and still have although it doesnt see much use these days a leica VLUX 1 and wonderful lens...and a fairly deficient sensor as I couldnt shoot much in the way of anything in low light..
the lens was pretty outstanding for a all in one “bridge” camera.
Im not familiar with the A540 but have seen a lot of reasonably quality stuff produced using the powershots.
Canon AE-1 FTW!
Sensor size is more important than pixel count.
My folks bought me an AE-1 Program in the mid 1980s. I used that until about 1990, then bought a Canon T-90. Had to have some warranty work done on the T-90 early on (the auto-advance wasn't auto advancing), but then no more issues.
I wish I still had the AE-1 Program and a B&W processing setup (and film, of course), I'd be using it today, or teaching my kids on it. I just haven't kept up with the tech on the new ones, so it's just been cheap point and shoots, or my cell phone. I would like to get back into it, and get a new Canon setup, but am so far behind, I don't even know where to start.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.