Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

There is no gay gene. They cannot reproduce so it is never passed on. Duh......


2 posted on 11/19/2014 8:25:34 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Liberals, on the other hand ....


3 posted on 11/19/2014 8:26:37 AM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

I’ve seen Barack Obama in some pretty gay jeans.


4 posted on 11/19/2014 8:28:48 AM PST by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Indeed it’s a learned issue.


16 posted on 11/19/2014 8:43:05 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Yeah, if you apply genetics and common sense,

any “gay gene” would have disappeared from the species long ago.


20 posted on 11/19/2014 8:47:37 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

I have long pondered the reason for the existence of a gay gene. If one exists, its function must be to end a problematic genetic line. Nature wants to reproduce. It seems that a gay gene would be a block to reproduction.


31 posted on 11/19/2014 9:39:32 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson