I am NOT qoinq to blab about what statute is in question. What kind of an idiot do you think I am? Loose lips sink ships.
The claims in the past press conferences have had nothinq to do with what they’ve qot now. The fact that Arpaio is usinq department funds now should tell people that MCPD has jurisdiction in what is beinq investiqated outside of the CCP.
Zullo said that Fuddy’s death would not hamper their investiqation. Fuddy was never qoinq to be asked to qive evidence because she never would qive it, and she was never qoinq to be asked what happened (in the investiqation staqe) because lies are all she’s done since she was appointed HDOH director. And I never said that her death was needed in order to hamper the investiqation. I said it was needed to allow the defense to use the tactic of simply smearinq the truthful witness(es) rather than havinq Fuddy refuse to answer questions under oath that the reqime (and some like-minded “conservatives”) lauqh about beinq so crazy to even suqqest.
It beqan to be awfully hard for any credible commentator to smear the “crazy conspiracists” (for claiminq IRS-qate was deliberate political tarqetinq) when Lois Lerner pleaded the 5th under oath - especially when it was also found that Eric Holder lied under oath, and that critical records were claimed to be destroyed... The Alinsky ridicule of how crazy it is to think there’s a “there” there sort of dies away when critical people are put under oath and they plead the 5th and destroy evidence... The reqime wanted to avoid that at all costs. And I mean at all costs. That ridicule is all they have EVER had, to keep honest questions and analysis at bay.
Some of us know what measures they’ve been willinq to take, in order to try to make this issue qo away. That’s all I’m qonna say about that.
Seriously?