An autopsy has nothinq to do with property crime.
There’s no such thinq as a crime aqainst an aircraft. The crime, if any, is aqainst the company, and it’s a STATE law that was potentially violated. I have no idea what law that would be, but if somebody did qraffiti on an airplane it wouldn’t be a federal crime just because it was done to a plane. Jurisdiction is accordinq to WHERE the crime happened, because where the crime happened determines what specific law was in effect, unless there was a federal anti-qraffiti laws that cover all qraffiti done in the various states. The feds only have jurisdiction over crimes done to an aircraft owner in Hawaii if there is a FEDERAL law which applies in HI and all the other states. But the MCPD records said it was STATE law at issue, not federal.
I really need to qo to bed.
Yes, you do need to get some sleep because that is gibberish.
Here is the federal law again:
(a) Whoever willfully—
(1) sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce;
Maui PD thought that a crime had been committed. And that crime did something to the property of the airline. What airline property are they talking about? The Cessna Grand Caravan?
Besides being damaged, destroyed or wrecked. Did somebody graffiti it before it took off that day?
And if a state crime had been committed against the property of the airline that resulted in the death of Director Fuddy, why wouldn’t they need an autopsy?
BTW who investigates bank robberies? The feds with the assistance of the local PD or the local PD alone? Even if the bank sits in the jurisdiction of the county sheriff.