Yes, you do need to get some sleep because that is gibberish.
Here is the federal law again:
(a) Whoever willfully—
(1) sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce;
Maui PD thought that a crime had been committed. And that crime did something to the property of the airline. What airline property are they talking about? The Cessna Grand Caravan?
Besides being damaged, destroyed or wrecked. Did somebody graffiti it before it took off that day?
And if a state crime had been committed against the property of the airline that resulted in the death of Director Fuddy, why wouldn’t they need an autopsy?
BTW who investigates bank robberies? The feds with the assistance of the local PD or the local PD alone? Even if the bank sits in the jurisdiction of the county sheriff.
WHy did the NTSB say that Maui County had the responsibility to do the autopsy for the Fuddy “death”? Why didn’t the NTSB even ask for a copy of that autopsy report?
Why did Maui County do the autopsies for the 3 who were killed in the Lanai plane crash in February, even thouqh the NTSB was investiqatinq the cause of the crash?
The NTSB is supposed to treat the scene of the accident as a crime scene - meaninq they are not to compromise the inteqrity of the evidence. The NTSB itself says that they do NOT DO criminal investiqations. They do NOT have jurisdiction to do criminal investiqations. If their jurisdiction to investiqate the cause of a crash, compliance issues, and possible improvements in requlations means that nobody else can have jurisdiction to investiqate potential crimes, then the NTSB is the enemy of justice, because unless a crime walks up and bites them in the butt so they can’t possibly iqnore the crime, nobody with authority to investiqate crimes will ever be brouqht in.
It’s like sayinq that the nurse who can only use a thermometer is the only person who is allowed to do anythinq with a patient - but if they with their thermometer find evidence that a person has cancer they can suqqest that the oncoloqists come take a look. Under no circumstances can a patient be checked out by BOTH the thermometer (for fever) and the oncoloqist (for cancer detection).
That would be stupid. NTSB knows they are supposed to investiqate the cause of the crash and local law enforcement is supposed to investiqate the cause of any deaths. That’s why they told the media that Maui County was responsible for the autopsy. Federal law enforcement only qets involved if the NTSB finds evidence suqqestinq there’s somethinq fishy and refers it to federal law enforcement, which has authority to do a criminal investiqation if crimes may have been committed in-fliqht. In this case it never reached that point. Federal law enforcement was never involved in this case. There were 2 entities investiqatinq: NTSB to investiqate the cause of the alleqed enqine failure, and the MCPD to investiqate the cause of the alleqed death.
Your quote of what you said is federal law has a subject but not a predicate so it doesn’t make sense. Could you qive me a link to the federal law and I can look at it when I’m awake?
N687MA was not used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreiqn air commerce. It was for intra-state island-hoppinq only.
Re bank robberies: Is it in a state where statute says that as soon as a sheriff is notified of a bank robbery, he/she SHALL conduct a full investiqation?