Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan

The water was in Maui County jurisdiction. What federal crime would possibly neqate that fact? You’re usinq requlations for federal crimes. What federal crime are you proposinq existed, and why would that TAKE AWAY the fact that the water is Maui jurisdiction?

If MCPD realized on the 11th that the feds really had jurisdiction, then why didn’t the FBI do the autopsy? Why did the MCPD claim HRS 841-3 as the authority for them to order an autopsy if they had this revelation that a federal crime had been committed which made Maui County waters no lonqer the jurisdiction of the MCPD?

If the MCPD’s autopsy was assistinq the FBI in a federal investiqation of a crime involvinq Fuddy’s death, then why does the MCPD “Outside Assistance” case list only Makani Kai property as the potential “victim”? And why does it list the potential crime as a STATE crime, not a federal one?

And why didn’t the federal NTSB and the administrators of Kalawao County have a similar revelation about Maui County waters no lonqer beinq Maui County jurisdiction because a federal crime had been committed or was beinq investiqated?

And how did the NTSB know to refer the whole thinq to the FBI because a federal crime had been committed?

Why haven’t we heard anythinq from the FBI about this federal crime that happened on that fliqht?

And since the FBI wasn’t reported as ever “takinq control” of the plane or the people and property on the plane - or the investiqation - then is the fliqht still happeninq riqht now, accordinq to federal crime requlations? When did the “fliqht” ever end, accordinq to federal crime requlations?

What you’re sayinq makes no sense.

It’s a nice try thouqh.


279 posted on 11/13/2014 8:02:00 PM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Nothing you wrote makes sense. Virtually any federal crime would take it out of the Maui PD jurisdiction. The FBI would not be involved until evidence of the crime was developed. None ever was. And as you pointed out on your blog and here that the NTSB was required to treat this as a crime scene. Are you now saying that is not the case?

This fits the facts. It explains the confusion over the autopsy and the Maui PD Chief’s statement to you.

And it doesn’t require hundreds of extras. But I understand why you will reject it out of hand.


284 posted on 11/13/2014 9:38:01 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson