Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; CpnHook

Where in 841-3 or 841-4 does it say that sworn witness statements are required to be taken in a complete investigation?

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/histatutes/5/38/841/841-3

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/histatutes/5/38/841/841-4


244 posted on 11/13/2014 11:53:48 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan

Those with knowledqe of a death in these circumstances are required to report what they know to the coroner under whose jurisdiction the death falls, and what they report is required to be qiven under oath with the statement transcribed.

I can’t believe the contortions you quys are qoinq throuqh in order to try to say that you can have a “complete investiqation” without ever talkinq to witnesses - even thouqh Chief Faaumu acknowledqes that if HRS 841-3 was in effect it would be required.

You quys are the ones accusinq the MCPD of beinq either idiots or liars. What is your evidence to support that?


249 posted on 11/13/2014 12:07:14 PM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

To: 4Zoltan

The sworn statement statute is cited in the article.


336 posted on 11/15/2014 3:50:14 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson