Posted on 11/11/2014 3:41:54 AM PST by SkyPilot
The stars of a viral video of their subway brawl have been slapped with assault charges.
In the video, 21-year-old Danay Howard can be seen taunting Jorge Pena, 25, over his clothing before the argument turn physical.
Howard and Pena were both arrested at the West Fourth Street subway station at about 5am Saturday along with Howard's friends Kevin Gil, 21, and Shanique Campbell, 20, who had jumped into the fight to support her.
Howard, the woman who was shockingly slapped across the face, has been hit with the most severe charges - including a felony.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The freeze frame shot of the pimp slap moment is a keeper.
“Pardon me maam, here’s a little something for you to take home”
And this is exactly the type of critters I get to face in the classroom daily. I have been struck in the head by heavy thrown objects, spit on, threatened, etc. They are not raised, they are spawned, usually by 2 unthinking individuals taking no note of anything but their lust of the moment. They are no more prepared to parent respectful, kind, industrious offspring than they are to fly to the moon sans capsule. Thus, our cities are filled with the likes of these gimmedats.
Funny, she doesn’t look Scottish... Clan McKuntaKinte?
Ray Rice’s fiancé should not have spit in his face either. Sadly everyone wanted to hang Roger Goodell for her actions.
It’s not PC, but I differentiate niggers from the Black Community. I have a black community family two doors up the street. They are not in the same world as the niggers. It is an insult to Black People to dump these feral animals in the same class as Black Community. And around East Tennessee we have a growing population of pink-skinned feral animals to add to the feral herd.
From the video I saw, Ray Rice spit in her face first outside the elevator. They both appear to have a loving, healthy relationship. Ray was even kind enough to move her body out of the elevator.
Like force is not in the NY statute (linked below).
The phrase "when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary" is the operable phrase in the statute.
A reasonable person, confined, to some extent, within a subway car, facing a group of feral yutes who are instigating a confrontation, would reasonably ascertain violent intent, and that the group of feral yutes intended to inflict serious bodily harm or death.
In spite of NY being NY, any competent attorney should be able to demonstrate, using recent documented cases, that the use of deadly force against any of a group of feral yutes would be reasonable and justified in such circumstances.
As of yet, no non-police citizen has exercised the use of deadly force against these urban sub-humans since Bernie Goetz, who obviously did not have a competent attorney. Eventually, someone will.
Article 35 - NY Penal Law - DEFENSE OF JUSTIFICATION
S 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person.
1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subdivision two, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to defend himself, herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by such other person, unless:
(a) The latter's conduct was provoked by the actor with intent to cause physical injury to another person; or
(b) The actor was the initial aggressor; except that in such case the use of physical force is nevertheless justifiable if the actor has withdrawn from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal to such other person but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force; or
(c) The physical force involved is the product of a combat by agreement not specifically authorized by law.
2. A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person under circumstances specified in subdivision one unless:
(a) The actor reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to use deadly physical force. Even in such case, however, the actor may not use deadly physical force if he or she knows that with complete personal safety, to oneself and others he or she may avoid the necessity of so doing by retreating; except that the actor is under no duty to retreat if he or she is:
(i) in his or her dwelling and not the initial aggressor; or
(ii) a police officer or peace officer or a person assisting a police officer or a peace officer at the latter`s direction, acting pursuant to section 35.30; or
(b) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible criminal sexual act or robbery; or
(c) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary, and the circumstances are such that the use of deadly physical force is authorized by subdivision three of section 35.20.
Funny, in court they always state like force.
And NY as an entity in actual practice does not recognize a right to self defense.
Yes, you quoted it.
Gold star.
In actual practice the law is nullified.
And worst of all, they will most likely replicate themselves several times over.
Some of today’s young women are savages.
You can take ‘em out of the jungle......
Most of todays young women are dismissive, dispassionate, subclinical sociopaths that are devoid of any faculty of empathy, and do not have the ability to feel remorse.
Just sayin'.
Well said.
Pretty funny as far as brawls go
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.