Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Honest to God.

I said, and I quote, “This does not mean parents have to pay for college.”

I think the part you are misconstruing is that I said if parents do not make an effort to make their kids lives better, should not expect the same from their children.

If parents are selfish, and if they do not provide the basic fundamentals that are expected from a parent to a child (Food, clothing, shelter, encouragement, love,etc.) the child is not going to turn out well.

I said, what you reap, you sow.

Now please tell me where that says if a parent dosen’t pay for college they should be abandoned when they are sick and infirm.

You won’t be able to, because I never said it.

I did say that your children are pretty unfortunate to have you as a parent. I cannot imagine the poor example you have provided them—hoarding love, money, and their well being because you did not get it—why should they. You are a sad example of a man.


95 posted on 10/29/2014 7:29:29 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt
I had originally responded to this person:

I hope the kids have made dad known that they will not support him if he is infirm or destitute in his old age. And don’t knock on the door with suitcase in hand.

8 posted on Tuesday, October 28, 2014 7:13:24 PM by morphing libertarian

You decided to pile onto me, and I thought you were the person I had responded to. I didn't realize that you were just ganging up on me. My apologies.

96 posted on 10/29/2014 7:33:56 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson