Posted on 10/10/2014 6:10:17 AM PDT by rktman
Last night Hollywood actress Gwyneth Paltrow hosted a fundraiser for President Obama and the Democrats at her ritzy home in Brentwood, California. Paltrow is worth $140 million dollars and was raised in a rich, privileged family before making her way to the big screen. But that didn't stop her from classifying herself as a "working mother" concerned about equal pay for women, an issue Obama has been dishonestly harping on.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
So the washed-out, gaunt, stringy-haired, barely-even-cute chick has the hots for the flap-eared, wart-faced, purple-lipped, peanut-head Ichabod Crane?
Sounds about right!
Eggs actly. Everyone should make the same “salary” as the lyin’ king regardless of effort. There. Equal pay.
That is synonymous with she is so full of herself (herself = goop). She must feel she doesn't have enough worshippers and needs to recruit more.
There are few professions with such glaring pay inequities as the movie industry.
May she experience bankruptcy and REALLY learn what earning a living wage is all about.
...
Say what you want, but she looks pretty when she takes her clothes off for her job. Nice work if you can get it. So far, nobody is lining up to pay me $140 million for a job like that.
Gwyneth is a victim of too much air between her ears.
I really hate that her two kids are going through the divorce of their parents; it saddens me so much. But her husband is a modern-day musical genius whose music is always somehow uplifting. He made a mistake marrying out of his religion; he is wandering around not clear on what he believes after having been raised Catholic; but when all is said and done, I'm starting to be glad he is out of this relationship with this narcissistic airhead Paltrow.
I would have liked to see the expression on the face of The Lunch Lady as a blonde bimbo hit on her man without shame.
translation: It is government’s job to see that all working moms have the same income as Gwyneth Paltrow.
She is so dumb that I just can’t speak right.
“It has to be a hyped myth.”
Well, it is actually a truism. However, in order to achieve this truth, the left has had to take the aggregate total income of ALL men and then average it by the number of men in the work force. Then when it is found that this number IS higher than the average of the aggregate of all women’s income divided by all women in the workforce, they say that men earn more than women.
What that means is that they don’t account for women’s choices to work less hours, or to take maternity leave, or to choose lower wage professions. They think that nurses (mostly women) should be paid as much as doctors (mostly men.)
Yes, it is a truism. However, one must value the collective over individuals and not account for the choices of individuals. So, in conclusion, it is a bellweather for morons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.