Posted on 09/19/2014 4:42:43 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2
If an Omnipotent Force gave you the choice of:
1) President Hillary Clinton AND Republican Senate and House, OR,
2) Let the election chips fall where they may,
Which would you choose?
No, I wasn’t making your point for you.
JFK’s law, JFK president, with an overwhelming democrat Congress and Senate, JFK”s dream was a done deal, it didn’t take his 1963 death to make it so.
You really need to learn more about JFK and how far left he was.
With you there's only one way to see things and there's no nuance or strategy. You're evidently an agent provocateur trying to make Conservatives look like fools.
And while on the subject, your characterization of "democrats have not won the white vote since 1964, how do you think immigrants vote..." is a false distinction since many immigrants ARE white and many natives are not, you racist bastard!
Look at what you are arguing for, more importation of immigration/democrats.
Pointing out how whites in America vote, is not racist, it is routine exit polling.
If you want to rage, rage at the left’s obsession with immigration, they know what you are trying not to see.
WHERE? Show me where I'm arguing for that?
English is not my mother tongue. You sure it's yours?
Fine, if you want to end immigration, great, it is killing us, and frankly, already has.
At the very least the border can be secured and it's obviously suicidal not to.
I would prefer a Conservative Congress instead of a Republican one.
I too want a 50 year moratorium of almost zero immigration, meaning 10 or 30 thousand a year or whatever just for the little detail stuff that always needs doing.
Johnson’s Great Society was just JFK blowing smoke. He Never intended for this CRAP to happen. It was all done in his memory (like allot of other crap).
Edumacate me anse12 /s
sorry if ‘crap’, the word offends some (as it dose my mother)
And hope it is Texas finally seceding from this circus.
Chips please.
No Hillary for prez. She is no moderate. The democratic party is so far to the left, Roosevelt would be ashamed of it.
1960 Reagan called JFK a Marxist in a private letter asking to be able to help defeat him, JFK unionized the government, JFK was not faking being a liberal, he was trying to hide it from 1960 America, JFK stealing that election destroyed America.
Ok, ansel12 Edumacate me.
Kennedy with his overwhelming majority in the House and Senate (Like Obammy) accomplished WHAT????
oh, yea he got a Pulitzer prize, that sounds vaguely familiar.
He started Civil Rights Legislation, which the Senators and Congressman of his OWN damn PARTY, wanted to have NOTHING to do with (even though it was time AMERICA passed something).
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty? with Russia and Great Britain
Sending Advisors to Vietnam
Bay of Pigs
Spoke of the MOON
Bottom Line: Most in his party mistrusted him and some even despised him.
World Events RAN the Kennedy Administration not the other way around, kinda like obammy, except obummer is willing to circumvent OUR Constitution, unlike your wonder boy Kennedy.
Can Biden resign and Hillary become Veep and then Obama resigns and it all happens by Jan 1, with the R congress I’ll take it.
ANYTHING to get out of 2 more years of Obama!
When Reagan privately writes to the vice president of the united States and labels JFK a Marxist, there is clearly more to JFK than your version.
His immigration goals have destroyed us, his emptying the mental hospitals created homelessness (it took a few years for the lawsuits to get the mentally ill truly out and onto the streets).
“In 1962, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 10988, which permitted collective bargaining by federal employees. Widely seen as a gift to George Meany, the AFL-CIO head who helped Kennedy win the White House, the executive order was also a gift to government unions, both because it widened federal membership and because it signaled national approval of unions for state and local employees.”
Personally, I do not think Hillary will be the Rat nominee. However, the DNC and their stooges in the News Cartel can keep her out front to keep scrutiny being shed on their real potential candidates for as long as possible.
She can keep snarfing up speaking fees and donations and then suddenly withdraw to bake cookies for the grandkid.
Why not just replace the current set of clueless incompetents (e.g. Valerie Jarrett) with a fresh batch of clueless incompetents?
That isn’t any choice at all. Republicans have shown they don’t know how to handle power.
Didn't the Protestant vote also go Democrat in 1844, 1852, 1856, 1884, 1892, 1912, etc.?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.