Posted on 09/17/2014 3:31:56 PM PDT by Morgana
Belgium’s Minister of Justice approved a euthanasia request Monday from a convicted rapist serving a life sentence.
The Brussels court of appeal will review the case September 29, but Belgian media report it is expected simply to record the existence of the agreement between the man and the government.
This would not be the first euthanasia of a Belgian prisoner – a terminally ill man who had already spent 27 years in jail was legally killed two years ago – but in the case of Frank Van Den Bleeken, the euthanasia request is being linked to the conditions of his imprisonment.
Van Den Bleeken, 50, has spent close to 30 years in prison. He was sentenced to life-long imprisonment for several counts of rape, one of them followed by murder. He has been declared irresponsible for these acts because of psychiatric disorders and does not want to be released from prison, considering himself to be “a danger for society.” Despite having repeatedly asked for psychiatric treatment, none has been forthcoming in the absence of any Belgian institution prepared to take up this sort of patient.
The convicted rapist says his psychological suffering is “intolerable” and it is on these grounds that three doctors decided last May that Van Den Bleeken should be entitled to euthanasia – even though he has also asked for a transfer to a Dutch institution where psychiatrically ill criminals receive adequate treatment and care.
He presented both demands to the minister of Justice via an emergency procedure. The Brussels appeal court decided that the minister, Maggie De Block, was not competent to order a transfer to the Netherlands but that she could decide to grant his request for euthanasia. The decision is being called a purely “medical” one by the minister who told the press that she confined herself to following the doctors’ opinion.
A previous euthanasia request made by Van Den Bleeken three years ago was rejected on the grounds that all had not been done to ensure that he would suffer less and that other options than death were available.
Now, even though it is clear that the prisoner would find more humane conditions of detention in nearby Holland, that he is conscious of the gravity of the acts he commits under the pressure of his mental illness, and that he is in need of medical care, the decision to make him die reads as a further trivialization of euthanasia in a country where an ever-increasing amount of psychological motives are being accepted to justify “mercy-killing.”
As in all the states of the European Union, the death penalty does not exist; it was abolished in Belgium in 1996. Rapists and murderers can find themselves sentenced to life-long sentences with no hope at all of ever being freed, a perspective which some find worse than death.
Since Van Den Bleeken’s story received media coverage, including a televised interview at the end of 2013, fifteen other prisoners have contacted the “UL-Team,” an information center for end-of-life questions, euthanasia expert Wim Distelmans told the media this Tuesday. He said those numbers are expected to rise. Distelmans is known for his support and active participation in cases of euthanasia for psychological reasons.
No date has been fixed for Van Den Bleeken’s death but his family has indicated that a doctor willing to perform the act has been found. Once the appeals court has given its ruling the prisoner will be allowed to leave the Turnhout prison where he is interned at present, and will be transferred to an unnamed hospital where he will be able to say goodbye to his family before receiving a lethal injection.
I'm willing to show the dude some mercy. He at least admits he has a problem and wants help desperatly. This is the best Belgium can do? Or any country for sex offenders for that matter?
Euthanasia implies peaceful death. If that’s the case, they’re doing it wrong.
So what intellectual loophole is the state playing calling this “euthanasia” versus “capital punishment”?
That is’s HIS choice versus the state’s, acting on behalf of the victims?
If the goal is to PUNISH, keep him alive.
The end result of “euthanasia” is the same as if the state were to simply kill him.
Don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining.
Why not just air drop that scum into the Islamic State and wait for him to be beheaded by Jihadi Jack al Englandi?
“Why not just air drop that scum into the Islamic State and wait for him to be beheaded by Jihadi Jack al Englandi?”
Because rape is not a crime in Islamic countries
Rapists in this country used to be sentenced to death by hanging. We need to bring that back.
Give him a piece of rope, a razor blade and a plastic bag. Let him decide which to use.
Should just get a coven of homos to repeatedly violate him in every conceivable way.
Because in Islamic countries they execute the victim.
europe is bringing back the death penalty... !
In Belgium they are seriously discussing prescribing euthanasia to cure depression. In fact they used it once on a person who has a sex change surgery and later fond she was wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.