Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jennifer Lawrence Deserves Justice not Sympathy
Townhall ^ | 09/13/2014 | John Nantz

Posted on 09/13/2014 11:13:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Hoodat
Gingrich at those who were involved did get justice.

Boehner chased McDermott thru the courts for years and ended up getting a decision against him...and a fine.

Notice how you almost never see McDermott on TV anymore? He used to be all over the place.

21 posted on 09/13/2014 12:13:32 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Lawrence isn't in legal trouble.

But her immoral choices may dent her income a bit.

22 posted on 09/13/2014 12:15:44 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

From the days that the, then, local ‘bulletin board service’ obtained it’s charter from the federal government, to gain access to ‘the new computer connection called the internet’, in 1993, to today, the admonishment most ignored is:
“Once you put something on there, it will be there forever, and there is not one person alive, that will not be able to see that, at some time in their life!”


23 posted on 09/13/2014 12:16:06 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who on Earth ever thought putting something personal online was a good idea?

I know what I do isn’t safe either, being that I print photos and place them in a booklet. But I’ve got a thing against even normal photos all going online.


24 posted on 09/13/2014 12:30:17 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

I put my nude photos in the cloud and no hits.


25 posted on 09/13/2014 12:30:59 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Of course, there’s no right action on the part o the hacker. I don’t condone them in the slightest. The Internet is not a “safe” place for information however.


26 posted on 09/13/2014 12:35:34 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Guess you’re not a blue painted X-Men star then.


27 posted on 09/13/2014 12:37:16 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

something to consider


28 posted on 09/13/2014 12:38:04 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I can sympathize. I’ve been posting nude photos of my self for years with the same result; no result. I have gotten desperate lately, increasing the number of photos, changing lighting, changing angles, still no results. I’m very discouraged and am beginning to feel discriminated against.


29 posted on 09/13/2014 12:49:03 PM PDT by upchuck (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I did receive a letter from google, apple, and MS threatening to disconnect me if I don’t remove the photos.


30 posted on 09/13/2014 12:50:42 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
Whoever thought that taking a few polaroids and keeping them in a shoebox up in the closet was a good idea? I mean, a burglar could easily break into your home and steal them, scan them, then post them to 4chan.

This is not, was not, in any way shape or form the fault of Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Hudson, etc. The only responsible party is the scumbag burglar, whether physical or electronic, who broke in and stole her folder or shoebox of pictures.

Moral responsibility lies with anyone who views these pictures knowing that they've been stolen from that shoebox. It is NO different.

31 posted on 09/13/2014 12:50:52 PM PDT by Benito Cereno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sagar

You assume a lot!


32 posted on 09/13/2014 12:57:20 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: what's up
But her immoral choices...

So...you think it's immoral to take a picture of what one sees in the mirror?

33 posted on 09/13/2014 1:01:18 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

You got letters? Gee whiz, I never got nothing. Even Google Analytics is ignoring my pics.


34 posted on 09/13/2014 1:02:58 PM PDT by upchuck (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

I agree with that, or course, but I’m sure we are all more exposed that we realize.

I myself was the victim of identify theft long before anyone called it that, long before Al Gore invented the internet.

Someone stole my checkbook and I just had a million problems as a result. It only cost me time and aggravation, but plenty of both of those.


35 posted on 09/13/2014 1:09:44 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Benito Cereno

Most people who break into homes, I have had it happen, steal my machete, my mantelpiece, or jewelry, why? Probably because I am not some big celebrity, and they wouldn’t be valued at anything. The only reason why I didn’t get an identity theft from that was because my main identity stuff was either outside te home with me or ignored in favor of my wife’s jewelry or my souvenir machete.


36 posted on 09/13/2014 1:19:31 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Benito Cereno

It was online but it’s still theft, so I still agree that the hacker was anything but decent. In fact, never had a fondness for the hardcore hackers anyways, so narcissistic, so living in their tiny world.


37 posted on 09/13/2014 1:28:41 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ok, Mary Elizabeth Winstead’s pics were taken by/for her husband, and were deleted years ago.
I believe she deserves sympathy and whoever did this needs to go to jail, same as the jerk who hacked into Sarah Palin’s e-mail.


38 posted on 09/13/2014 1:46:59 PM PDT by chae (The Lannisters send their regards--Game of Thrones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here is Jennifer Lawrence naked (not really). She looks kinda blue in this one.... : )
http://media2.onsugar.com/files/2013/06/03/827/n/1922398/a9b08829ec076b31_2_wm.xxxlarge/i/Jennifer-Lawrence-Nicholas-Hoult-Montreal-Pictures.jpg

After researching using google I cannot find any real naked photos of her..... They have disappeared.


39 posted on 09/13/2014 1:48:57 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Yeah, I’m not going to believe any of this till I see the evidence!


40 posted on 09/13/2014 2:20:28 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ($$$$$$$$ DEFUND OBAMA! $$$$$$$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson