somebody shoulda run that filthy queer through a meat grinder...
Posted on 08/25/2014 8:40:39 PM PDT by Morgana
He is known as “The Father of the Sexual Revolution,” and if you’ve ever taken a university course on 20th century history, you’ll have heard his name: Alfred Kinsey.
Kinsey was not only the “father” of the Sexual Revolution, he set the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s with his 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and his 1953 Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.
These books revealed to a shocked and somewhat titillated population things they had never known about themselves: That between 30-45% of men had affairs, 85% of men had had sex prior to marriage, that a staggering 70% of men had slept with prostitutes, and that between 10 and 37% of men had engaged in homosexual behavior.
Much less talked about were his other disturbing “findings”—an in-depth study on the “sexual behavior” of children, as well as claims that nearly 10% of men had performed sex acts with animals (as well as 3.6% of women), and that this number rose to between 40-50% based on proximity to farms.
Got that? The Father of the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children.
Kinsey’s research portrayed people as amoral and sex-driven, and is credited as fundamentally changing the way our culture views sex.
But was he right?
To begin with, the integrity of much of his work has long since been called into question: among his questionable practices, Kinsey encouraged those he was working with to engage in all types of sexual activity as a form of research, misrepresented single people as married, and hugely over represented incarcerated sex criminals and prostitutes in his data.
But beyond this is the simple fact that Kinsey himself was a pervert and a sex criminal. Advertisement
For example, where did he get all of his data on the “sexual behavior of children”? The answer is nothing short of chilling. Dr. Judith Reisman (whose research has since been confirmed time and time again) explained in her ground-breaking work Sex, Lies and Kinsey that Kinsey facilitated brutal sexual abuse to get his so-called research:
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal “child sexuality.” Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.
For example, “Table 34” on page 180 of Kinsey’s “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” claims to be a “scientific” record of “multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.” Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for “orgasm” by Kinsey’s “technically trained” aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an alleged 26 “orgasms.” Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these child “data” to prove children’s need for homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via “safe-sex” education. These data are also regularly used to “prove” children are sexual from birth.
The man heralded with enthusiasm by mainstream publications such as Time and Life Magazine was nothing less than a monstrous facilitator of child-rape. In fact, he even went so far as to record children shrieking and thrashing in pain, passing out and convulsing as the result of the hellish abuse he was putting them through, as evidence of “orgasm”—especially for children who could not yet speak.
Kinsey’s so-called research was simply a quest to justify the fact that he himself was a deeply disturbed man. Dr. Reisman writes, “Both of Kinsey’s most recent admiring biographers confessed he was a sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and coerced his wife, his staff and the staff’s wives to perform for and with him in illegal pornographic films made in the family attic. Kinsey and his mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard, had ‘front’ Marriages that concealed their strategies to supplant what they say as a narrow pro-creational Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous ‘anything goes’ bi/gay pedophile paradise.”
Got that? The Father of the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children. His goal was not just to engage in scientific research in order to see where the data took him, but rather, as one of his prominent biographers Michael Jones notes, to launch a crusade to undermine traditional sexual morality. He did so to wild success—Kinsey’s influence on sex education and law in the Western world is absolutely staggering.
Some have claimed that even though Kinsey may have been disturbed and engaged in immoral behavior, his fundamental conclusions and his data still remain accurate. This, too, proves blatantly false. According to Dr. Reisman: Advertisement
1. [Dr. Kinsey’s team] ‘forced’ subjects to give the desired answers to their sex questions, 2. Secretly trashed three quarters of their research data, and 3. Based their claims about normal males on a roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. Moreover, so few normal women would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a year with a man ‘married,’ reclassifying data on prostitutes and other unconventional women as “Susie Homemaker.”
It is crucially important that people become aware of the truth behind the Kinsey Reports.
Today’s pornified sex educators, legal experts, academics, and more disturbingly, pedophile groups such as NAMBLA pushing “inter-generational intimacy,” all use Kinsey’s work to justify their agendas and lend their causes scientific credibility.
Most people have no idea who Alfred Kinsey really was and how his so-called research was actually performed. I myself first heard of Alfred Kinsey in the first year of my history degree at university, where my professor announced that there “was no Sexual Revolution at all”—because the Kinsey Reports proved that people had been engaging in all sorts of bizarre and criminal sexual behaviors all along.
The real story is horrifying. It is stomach-churning. But it is also crucial that we know how, exactly, we got to this place in our culture of such sexual nihilism.
This is why I blame Kinsey and not feminists for all the sick stuff that goes on. Yes he was evil.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
80% of men have affairs in America, the rest have them in Europe.
I certainly hope...both for their sake and the nation's...that they were joking.
Also,37%...or even 10%...of guys having pervert sex? Nope,I refuse to believe that.Not in *this* country at least.Countries that practice the Religion of Pieces might be another story.
What about Thailand?
willing lab rats.
Still we know this , but there are still people who could not careless due to them not wanting any laws or wanting anarchy.
It’s all about them {sigh}
it is sick and why I get so pissed off with those who feel we should get rid of marriage laws, age of consent etc
Of course Alfred was a sex criminal. Male queers are even more so when you look at the numbers of young boys infected with deadly diseases by these perverts. It is the gay way.
Yea and Kinsey is at the heart of all of that
Dr. Kinsey King of the FDRQ’S
I’m actually sorry to give him that title.
Finally, more websites are out there that are not ‘banned’ (suspiciously) by McAfee:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Duke/selwyn.htm
isn’t there an hbo or showtime series glorifying this fraud?
somebody shoulda run that filthy queer through a meat grinder...
That reminds me of a line in the novel (albeit not in the film) “The Silence of the Lambs.” Hannibal Lecter, a psychiatrist, had fooled his hated jailer, Frederick Chilton, by telling Chilton that the serial killer was “Bllly Rubin.” But it hadn’t yet been made clear that this was a big joke by Lecter.
Later, with the still undiscovered, Lecter has been moved to the huge cage in Tennessee talking to Agent Starling. She’s not supposed to be there, and Chilton, with several guards, stops their conversation. In parting, Lecter tells Clarice (so that Chilton can hear), “Did you know Dr. Chilton has no medical degree?” Dr. Lecter said. “Please bear that in mind later on.” Meanwhile, Chilton is giving all manner of news interviews on his glorious “Search For Billy Rubin.”
When Lecter busts out of the holding cell, he leaves a drawing in his toilet. It’s the word CHILTON with some numbers added in, meaning C33H36N4O6, bilirubin.
According to Dr. Judith Reisman our 1949 mindset was just too innocent. I have to admit when I first read his data it did not hit me. It was not until Dr. Reisman explained it to me in great detail that I “got” it. Trust me it hit me like a boulder dropping from the sky.
A lot to I just did not understand or interpret well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.