>>“They’re not producing or something, because half the kids in schools are from low-income families.”
They are producing GDP and money for taxes, so the low-income kids can be lured to the United States from their Third-World POS country to become future Democrat voters.
They are working hard to maintain a standard of living that the Progressive Elite (of both parties) want to destroy for all but themselves. They have decided to cut children out of the budget to afford the toys that they are told they need to be happy.
Dear Jerry:
You are right about affluent and mostly white people not having enough kids. The good news is that means fewer Republican voters in the future. And, as you noted, many young kids don’t speak English. Not to worry, they will grow up to be solidly behind the Democrats agenda.
But you seem mystified as to what caused this fortunate turn of events. I’m surprised that you don’t know but since you don’t I will summarize. Here is the version I use for non-Rocket Science majors:
1. Raise taxes on the middle class to a level that causes them to put off marriage until they are in their thirties.
2. Keep those taxes high to minimize the possibility that middle class couples can afford more than one child.
3. Allow mass illegal immigration into this country of people motivated to have as many U.S. citizen children as possible.
Simple and effective.
Oh, they’re producing alright...you don’t get to 1.34 BILLION children killed, just since 1980, without them producing.
http://www.numberofabortions.com/
Ehrmmm... How about speaking directly to the fact that the more than half referred to do not speak English (American, actually) is because THEY AND THEIR PARENT(S) ARE HERE ILLEGALLY!
How's that for addressing the fact, you simpering git?
(not you, mate, I'm addressing Brown.)
“half the kids in schools are from low-income families.”
News flash: 0bamanomics has forced half of Americans into low-incomes.
Pluswhich, smart “productive” people have left California.
BECAUSE THEY’RE TOO BUSY WORKING TO SUPPORT VAST POPULATIONS OF WELFARE SLUGS.
Forgive me, but I’m a bit suspicious of this article. These words were attributed to Gov. Moonbeam in June, but the article’s dated yesterday?
Democrats for the longest time have treated kids as a competition for the disposable income that families have, essentially competing with the government for that disposable income. So they discouraged having kids.
Now they’re finding out that without kids, there are no future tax payers. They’re realizing that kids are not an expense, but an investment in the future. At least some of them are. But since politics are short-term, I am not expecting the policies to change.
Stable heterosexual marriage is the lynchpin of entrance into and progression of the middle class. That is why they have to make war on both.
A stable functional middle class has little need for the big government policy prescriptions of the Democrats.
Dear Jerry,
Our affluent white family with five kids left California in 2010 for Wyoming and we’re not coming back.
Sincerely, Megan
Might be ‘cause they actually have to pay for their kids instead making taxpayers pay.
As a parent with a gaggle of kids, let me suggest this is a chicken/egg issue.
It’s not that’s the affluent aren’t having kids so much as not having kids is a recipe for being affluent.
Just saying...
The reproducing affluent who are family-oriented have already fled CA as they don’t want their kids learning about condoms and cumbers in 3rd grade. Those left behind aren’t interested in kids.
Affluent people are not going to put their children in public schools.
Translation:
We need more stupid white people to pay taxes to support for this wave of brown power welfare addicts.
Well, when you stop to consider what the affluent Brown family produced...
Middle class people can't afford many kids.