Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nebraska biocontainment unit prepared for the worst
journalstar.com (Lincoln Journal Star) ^ | August 6, 2014 | Chris Dunker

Posted on 08/08/2014 6:52:19 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe

There are 22 hospital beds capable of treating patients infected by the deadly Ebola virus in the United States.

Designed to completely isolate a patient and prevent further spread of a disease, they are located in places like Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, or the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, or the Rocky Mountain Laboratory in Montana.

Ten of them are in the Nebraska Biocontainment Patient Care unit in Omaha.

The Omaha center for treating infectious diseases entered “de facto standby” late last week

(Excerpt) Read more at journalstar.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: ebola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: El Gato

If your friend works in that hospital, keep in mind it is one of the very few with the proper equipment. Likely safer there than anywhere else.


21 posted on 08/08/2014 9:32:52 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lilypad

Keep in mind that they haven’t brought anyone there yet, it is just that the hospital has ten of the twenty two beds which are properly set up for the sort of isolation the disease requires. For now, the two confirmed and known cases are at Emory (as far as we know).


22 posted on 08/08/2014 9:34:51 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Wanna bet they have gag orders?


23 posted on 08/08/2014 9:49:29 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I wouldn’t be a bit surprised. We now have a thoroughly corrupt and criminal government.

And I believe many people on our side have death threats. They can make noises but can’t cross the line.


24 posted on 08/08/2014 9:54:20 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

very cool model !


25 posted on 08/08/2014 10:49:07 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
Just a thought I had. I wonder how the mosquitoes carrying the Ebola virus would fare with DDT in use.

Mosquitos do not carry or transmit Ebola. Many Ebola outbreaks have occurred when people found and ate a dead animal (usually a monkey or ape) in the forest. Bats are thought to be the usual host of Ebola; monkeys, apes, and humans can get Ebola from eating bats.

26 posted on 08/09/2014 4:44:36 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Exactly. The danger of Ebola spreading is not from a patient in an isolation unit, but from a person who is sick, unaware he or she has Ebola, and interacting with other people.

For example, if someone who is feeling a little sick were to go to a public place and vomit, anyone standing near enough to have bits of vomit splash on them or even breath droplets of vomit would be exposed. Whoever cleans up the mess will be exposed, and people handling the trash where the clean-up materials were thrown away could be exposed. Someone having diarrhea in a public toilet could expose the next few people using the toilet, since the act of flushing the toilet sends droplets into the air as far as 6 feet away. Plus, any residues of diarrhea remaining on the toilet could remain infectious afterwards, maybe for a few hours.

I could list many other scenarios where Ebola could spread. They all would involve an infected person who has not yet presented for medical care. There is also some risk early in the medical care process, when medical personnel do not yet suspect Ebola and so expose themselves.


27 posted on 08/09/2014 4:55:42 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

As a doctor and I’m assuming from your screen name you is one don’t you think we are in more danger from an outbreak of the Spanish flu or the H1N9 than Ebola? Just curious.


28 posted on 08/09/2014 9:28:07 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Doc, I have a dumb question. These ebola patients, their waste fluids, some (needles, bloody linens) goes I assume into biohazard bags but does other like fecal waste go into the regular sewage system? Just wondering since there are always stories of fecal matter having too high a count in drinking water systems (and boil water alerts after) how would they handle that if it got into municipal water supplies since they treat waste water and then some goes back into municipal supplies?


29 posted on 08/09/2014 2:32:15 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“Mosquitos do not carry or transmit Ebola. Many Ebola outbreaks have occurred when people found and ate a dead animal (usually a monkey or ape) in the forest. Bats are thought to be the usual host of Ebola; monkeys, apes, and humans can get Ebola from eating bats.”

Thx.


30 posted on 08/09/2014 7:33:42 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; Cats Pajamas

Sorry folks, I’m not a doctor. My handle reflects a nickname I picked up while serving in the Navy.


31 posted on 08/10/2014 4:08:29 AM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"This is for the upper crust of the EXEMPT."

Nah, the 22 are for the proles. The elites have more than enough. I guarantee Congress has many more available to them 24/7 and the POTUS has enough for him and the Cabinet and their families and none of them would be available to the us proles...

32 posted on 08/10/2014 4:13:44 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wolf24
Yes it is UNMC.

http://www.nebraskamed.com/biocontainment-unit

33 posted on 08/11/2014 7:59:11 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
I could list many other scenarios where Ebola could spread.

The two people brought to the US are medical people, who knew they were treating Ebola patients.

What happens when there are 23, or 100 patients? They'll still likely be sent to the centers with the trained staff, and attempts will be made to isolate them, but the degree of protection for the staff, and others in the hospital will be lower. If they are sent to other facilities, with less well trained and equipped staffs, the risk will be higher yet.

34 posted on 08/11/2014 8:06:48 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson