Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Hillary Clinton’s conduct as a young attorney fair game?
The Volokh Conspiracy ^ | June 20, 2014 | Jonathan H. Adler

Posted on 06/22/2014 8:54:57 AM PDT by right-wing agnostic

Successfully defending a criminal defendant is nothing for Clinton to be ashamed of, so long as her conduct was ethical.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: noob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: right-wing agnostic

https://twitter.com/AuthorAE/status/466987846503378944/photo/1


21 posted on 06/22/2014 9:31:14 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Mitt Romney’s prep-school pranks and vacation details were fair game.

So is any bit of Hillary!’s record. .


22 posted on 06/22/2014 9:32:27 AM PDT by Salgak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Sure, why not? She is nothing special. Just another corrupt and incompetent politician.


23 posted on 06/22/2014 9:32:29 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

I’m watching John Kerry attempting to project an effective SOS with gravitas. It ain’t working - but I truly believe he will take on Hilary for POTUS nominee.

Cruz will crucify him.

Cruz & Allen West would be a ticket to freedom.


24 posted on 06/22/2014 9:33:55 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

I completely agree with you.

BOTH of our last two presidential candidates on the Republican side, have fought (desperately at times) to beat every one of their (Republican) rivals.

Then BOTH of them, once opposed by Barack Obama, quieted right now and didn’t run against him, with anywhere near the same determination. In fact, it was almost as if both of them, lost on purpose.

McCain did a great thing in picking Palin as his running mate in 2008. Other than that, I cannot think of why I would conclude they hadn’t both deliberately run to capture the GOP candidacy, then throw the election (almost as if on purpose) to Barack Obama.

I know that is not likely. But both of them, acted as if they really did not want to beat Obama nearly as badly, as they wanted to with the GOP candidacy.

To heck with the GOP if that is how we end up running people.

I say we keep a very clear eye on Palin, and I think she should run (against) the GOP in 2016.

I know a lot of people here disgree with that, but I’m all in favor of a Palin insurgency.


25 posted on 06/22/2014 9:34:55 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Sarah Palin, that was one thing, but what about Sarah Palin’s daughters? That’s what they did, so forget “fair game”.


26 posted on 06/22/2014 9:35:35 AM PDT by jocon307 (These people are (some Polish word) crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

McCain did a great thing in picking Palin as his running mate in 2008. Other than that, I cannot think of why I would conclude they hadn’t both deliberately run to capture the GOP candidacy, then throw the election (almost as if on purpose) to Barack Obama.


Considering the extremely poor performance of Sarah Palin’s “Handlers” and how they reacted when she “went rogue” I think Sarah’s talent caught them off guard.

She wasn’t supposed to be a good pick!


27 posted on 06/22/2014 9:37:13 AM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic
Is Hillary Clinton’s conduct as a young attorney fair game?

Probably not. After all, Hillary's Benghazi fiasco was two years ago, dude, and it's not fair game anymore. 'RATS get a pass on everything they do.

28 posted on 06/22/2014 9:38:31 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Feed the wacko enrviromentalists to the starving polar bears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

The MSM used more resources to investigate Sam “Joe the plumber” Wurzelbacher’s trade license than they did Baraq’s dubious birth cert. And Joe was just a guy who stumbled into an interview, LOL.


29 posted on 06/22/2014 9:39:57 AM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Under the assumed innocent until proven guilty system, each and every criminal defendant gets to have as much of a zealous defense that they can afford while the prosecutors proceed with neither pride nor passion in their prosecution.


30 posted on 06/22/2014 9:45:36 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic
Is Hillary Clinton’s conduct as a young attorney fair game?

Hillary and I are the same age. 28 in 1975 is not the same 28 as it is for many today. By age 28 I no longer thought of myself as being young. Enough had happened in my life that I was totally responsible for any decisions I made. She had been called on the carpet for actions during Watergate a couple of years earlier. Evidently that was wasted effort.

31 posted on 06/22/2014 9:49:22 AM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic
What makes you think that the architect of "THE VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY" has changed her legal beliefs and the practices that caused her to be fired by her boss on the HOUSE NIXON IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS? A leopard cant change his spots and a scum can't change her ways!

Google Jerry Zeifman (her boss)
32 posted on 06/22/2014 9:49:37 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

She did not say Hillary was 71. She was speaking about herself if al baby. could understand that oh boy


33 posted on 06/22/2014 9:51:51 AM PDT by al baby (Hi MomÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic
If Romney's alleged conduct as a boarding school student 45 years ago is fair game then the treatment of a rape victim by Attorney Rhodham is fair game.And so is Attorney Rodham’s having been fired from the Watergate investigation team by the Rat that was in charge.
34 posted on 06/22/2014 9:52:47 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

!


35 posted on 06/22/2014 9:56:59 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I would think a “successful ‘defense’” of someone who is guilty requires a breach of ethics.

...and you would be wrong. The U.S. Constitution requires that an attorney defend anyone accused of a crime, and there are many ethical ways to do so.

36 posted on 06/22/2014 9:59:19 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

She was also fired as a staffer for the Watergate investigation for he dishonesty.

Does anyone think she is any less dishonest today; or is she far worse?


37 posted on 06/22/2014 10:00:08 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic

Is there any shape that left-wing morality cannot be twisted into and made to fit?


38 posted on 06/22/2014 10:01:41 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

“What difference does it make?” ... She’s a democrat. Democrats are liars, thieves, anti-American lickspittlists, and degenerates. She’s a run of the mill democrat. She lies, steals, and is a degenerate. What difference does it make, demcrats will vote for her because she is one of them.


39 posted on 06/22/2014 10:06:04 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: right-wing agnostic
The victim, who is now 52, says any such claims were untrue, that she never made accusations against anyone else, and that she believes Clinton was lying.

The victim accuses Clinton of lying in an affidavit. That should have been at the top of the article, not buried half way down. That is the shocking crux of the matter.

40 posted on 06/22/2014 10:10:07 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson