1 posted on
05/16/2014 11:02:18 AM PDT by
Rusty0604
To: Rusty0604
Or what? Inquiring minds want to know...
2 posted on
05/16/2014 11:03:25 AM PDT by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: Rusty0604
That’s interesting. I wonder if they’re also going to start declaring that people on welfare can’t have more children until they get a job and start supporting their families?
3 posted on
05/16/2014 11:04:27 AM PDT by
MNGal
To: Rusty0604
Once the Government starts telling people they can’t procreate where does it stop?
4 posted on
05/16/2014 11:04:28 AM PDT by
gdani
(Every day, your Govt surveils you more than the day before)
To: Rusty0604
Can he at least still practice?
To: Rusty0604
To: Rusty0604
8 posted on
05/16/2014 11:06:43 AM PDT by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Rusty0604
But he can’t be required to get a photo ID for voting.
13 posted on
05/16/2014 11:08:25 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
FR Needs Donors To Survive
Please Donate!
14 posted on
05/16/2014 11:08:52 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Rusty0604
Do a Bradley Manning on him.
17 posted on
05/16/2014 11:10:14 AM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: Rusty0604
2 bricks and turn your head please
18 posted on
05/16/2014 11:11:09 AM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Rusty0604
I wonder how many kids he has already?
20 posted on
05/16/2014 11:11:58 AM PDT by
brooklyn dave
( We need a Klingon for President!)
To: Rusty0604
In this case, I’d vote for him to undergo a vasectomy—even if it had to be paid for with public funds.
21 posted on
05/16/2014 11:12:53 AM PDT by
basil
(2ASisters.org)
To: Rusty0604
Defendant was heard saying, “No problem, that’s the Biootches job.”
To: Rusty0604
To: Rusty0604
“Bailiff, Whack his pee pee.”
31 posted on
05/16/2014 11:29:52 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: Rusty0604
Jailing him for non-support is fine,although possibly counterproductive.This court order,OTOH,is very probably unconstitutional.
To: Rusty0604
If it keeps going up the judicial ladder, it will never stand. To deny a citizen the right to procreate will not stand. This goes up again the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause. If for some strange and goofy reasoning it does survive, then the gates are opening to be able to simply castrate him and to do other things to prevent a citizen from procreating.
33 posted on
05/16/2014 11:33:11 AM PDT by
SgtHooper
(This is my tag!)
To: Rusty0604
They gonna tie a knot in it??
36 posted on
05/16/2014 11:40:27 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Rusty0604
An Ohio appeals court has upheld a judge's order that a deadbeat father can't have more kids until he pays his back child support.He's a guy, right? This should NOT be a problem. Generally, it's the female that has the kids...
41 posted on
05/16/2014 12:10:40 PM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(I tweet, too... @Onelifetogive)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson