Posted on 05/15/2014 5:32:48 AM PDT by Gamecock
HONEA PATH --- A 25-year-old man is dead after he was shot Wednesday while wearing a bulletproof vest as he and his friends gathered in a garage on Broadmouth Church Road in Honea Path.
Blake Randall Wardell died at the scene after he was shot in the chest with a small-caliber gun, Anderson County Deputy Coroner Don McCown said. McCown said Wardell and about eight to 10 other people were gathered at the home when the shooting happened.
There was no evidence at the scene of a fight or struggle, McCown said.
"It wasn't a fight. They were actually going to take a shot at the vest," McCown said. "They were going to shoot the victim with the vest on. And he was shot in the chest, just above the vest."
McCown said the bulletproof vest appeared to be about 10 to 15 years old.
The shooting happened at around 3 a.m. Wednesday.
Deputies arrived at the home to find a man lying in the garage with a gunshot wound to the chest, Anderson County Sheriff's Lt. Sheila Cole said. Cole said people were performing CPR on the victim, and paramedics were called to the scene, Cole said.
Anderson County sheriff's investigators have charged Taylor Ann Kelly, 18, of Woodvale Road in Anderson, with involuntary manslaughter in connection with Wardell's death, Cole said.
In the warrant issued for Kelly's arrest, deputies state that they believe Wardell put on the vest and asked Kelly to shoot him. The bullet passed through the edge of the vest, and Wardell was hit in the chest. A handgun was used in the shooting, according to the warrant.
Wardell and Kelly knew each other as friends, Cole said.
The investigation is still ongoing but Kelly has been charged and is being held at the Anderson County Detention Center. Bond has not been set.
Cole said, based on state law, involuntary manslaughter is defined as the reckless disregard of the safety of others. A person convicted of involuntary manslaughter may be imprisoned for up to five years.
(Other sources report she is being held on $10,000 bail. GC)
Those vests do not have infinite life spans, they get taken out of service based upon years in use or exposure to moisture (sweating). It’s almost certain that this vest was beyond the manufacturers recommended service life, thus giving them some additional protection against reckless lawsuits.
That's a given. Family related to the deceased will come out of the woodwork lamenting the loss of such a fine young man with sooo many prospects. Then out come the lawyers. Look for the young lady to be sued; the homeowner (even if they were renting); other party guests; the vest manufacturer... Possible defendants that the lawyers will at least take a close look at include the gun manufacturer, the ammunition manufacturer, the store where the gun and/or ammo was purchased, maybe the store where the alcohol was purchased...
<carnival huckters's voice> After all, these good people have suffered a loss! Good old ... what was his name? ... well, that's immaterial, he was very important to them. The only thing that will help provide some relief to their terrible pain and suffering will be large piles of cash. (of which I get a percentage) </carnival huckters's voice>
Guilty
Under the influence of alcohol or other mind-altering substance, no doubt. Nothing good ever happens after midnight.
Guilty.
In regard to moral formation, actual information under control, and behavior, today's 25 is 1950's 9 year-old. The 18-year old young woman? In speech, thought, and behavior, today's 18 is in many ways an infant of the 1950's.
25 is the new 10.
Culling the herd
Bemis and Butthead.
LOL, yep!
Apparently,the shooter MOL missed the vest. Wound was "over the vest." Perhaps not worn properly, etc. etc. Also, beyond "small caliber" we don't know the details of the weapon.
Quite accurate to state:
Those vests do not have infinite life spans, they get taken out of service based upon years in use or exposure to moisture (sweating). Its almost certain that this vest was beyond the manufacturers recommended service life, thus giving them some additional protection against reckless lawsuits.
McCown said the bulletproof vest appeared to be about 10 to 15 years old.
Useless. Was the failure caused by missing the vest, (or only hitting the edge) or by the age of the vest? Cripes, answer some questions here.
but watch someone sue the vest mfgr anyway ...
***
Yep. And notice that the writer mentions the age of the vest, which has no bearing on the fact that the victim was shot.
What about the UNDERAGED POSSESION OF A HANDGUN ?
IIRC We are talking 21...
There is an incident in the late 90s, filmed and is out there on the blood/gore sites of a marine daring another marine to stab him with his bayonet through his PASGT/Flak jacket. Knife went right through it and the look on the kids face was horrible. He knew he was DRT. Bled like a water hose when the idiot pulled the 7” knife out. It is about as gruesome and sad as the chechen beheadings of russian soldiers.
they are both idiots, he asked her to shoot him, she can’t aim, what a couple of morons
“Mr. President, this is David Richards, the president of the New Lease Body Armor Company. Have a seat, Mr. Richards,” Greenwell added, nodding towards the chair Dr. Berkowitz had occupied.
“Mr. Richards, Director Greenwell asked you here because he felt your knowledge might help the task force with this terrible situation we’re facing. However, before we get into that, I understand that you have some grievances about government standards involving your business. I’ve been told that your sales literature contains serious allegations against the government. Is that true?”
“You mean, how the NIJ standard kills cops? Sure, I explain that to everyone, but they still keep doing it.” Richards’ speech pattern was a stacatto burst of words that ended as abruptly as it had started.
Unintended Consequences, June 21.
Someone will sue because the warning label didn’t state the vest does not cover all parts of the body. Just like halloween superman capes have to say “cape does not enable wearer to fly.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.