Posted on 02/04/2014 6:23:18 AM PST by GregNH
Dear Orly:
I have been in daily contact with Detective Lieutenant Mike Zullo from the Sheriff Joe Arpaio Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Obama Fraud Investigation – sometimes twice daily.
I’m sure you also might have heard that Lt. Zullo is preparing to release his some evidence that will truly be universe-shattering, and the knowledge we have is truly something you’re not going to be ready for.
This will absolutely, definitely change the eligibility landscape by 10,000%.
Mike has asked me to communicate with you that the new evidence – which, let me tell you, is so all-encompassingly gigantic, so incredibly huge – that we were hoping we could ask you to cooperate on one front.
Now, since we’ve all been vindicated 1,000% on the birth certificate issue, since Lt. Zullo’s forensic investigation has been so comprehensive, it’s really irrelevant compared to the new, shocking & completely emasculating evidence. The birth certificate is truly no longer of any real concern.
And we feel that way also about the Social Security Number issue.
Mike said he was slightly embarrassed but he feels as though there might be some unnecessary friction between you two, even though we all share the same goals, and that we and the posse support all the work you’ve done over the years.
But we would like to request that you stand down with regard to your ongoing court cases, which appear to have already run their course, you must admit. I cannot overstate the importance that your cooperation will bring to the disclosure of this essential information.
If so, we’d request that these court proceedings be respectfully closed by March 19, when Lt. Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio and I will make our announcement. And believe me – it’s going to be the most incredible, universe-shattering thing you’ve ever heard!
Mike said he’s confident that you’ll cooperate, as we bring to a close this horrible chapter in our fine, Christian country to a close.
Thank you in advance, Dr. Taitz. It will be a pleasure to watch Mr. Whoever-he-is be taken where he needs to be taken.
With our most humble respect,
The Rev. Dr. Carl Gallups, M.Div. ppsimmons Radio Ministry http://www.carlgallups.com WEBY 1330 a.m. Freedom Friday
If your driving drunk and run over someone you get charged with vehicular homicide but they will still through in the misdemeanor of having an open container in the car. The BC is the open container..
Yes - I served on a grand jury for a few months and they leave no offense aside, no matter how small.
We should see the downfall of the Obama admin. before 2016.
I am very hopeful. Have been for some time. Dam is cracking and the cracks are getting wider.
I've been reading things and oddly enough, I think you may be right. Rumblings; Stockman, Bachman, the CCP, Morsi's trial...
I'm with ya FRiend. Turned off the stoopid phone and unretired my old flip phone. Still occasionally using an older notepad but it's android 2.1.2 without the interpretive software.
Nice dig- what are the both of you doing to uncover the facts of Obama’s birth/background narrative?
I'm kinda curious...is their wage still the old standard 30 pieces of silver?
"Obama" wasn't even allowed to hold a copy of the "document" released by the WH.
Yawn... Here's what I'm not doing: I'm not sitting at a beachside bar in Waikiki with a daiquiri in my hand promising "universe-shattering" evidence of Obama's eligibility at the next press conference (and the next one after that, and after that and on and on...) as long as people keep clicking that donation button.
Zullo's pulling your leg (and making some nice change doing so). But, hey, he's saying what you want to hear so by all means, keep clicking that button if you want to see Obama frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs and deported to Kenya! It's gonna happen any day now!
And Michelle la Belle Obama.....inquiring minds speculate...
Support Free Republic with money not just participation.
Not personal Drew68, unless you haven't stepped up lately.
grin
If you have evidence of profiteering produce it.
Which is why it is so unprofessional for a supposed law enforcement agency to make an announcement that they will be unveiling earth-shattering evidence on March 19. If they have definitive evidence of a crime, they have a duty to act on it now and not wait. If they do not have definitive evidence of a crime, they have a duty to keep silent, for the protection of the innocent, until they do.
Bill Bryan, the disbarred attorney and certified moon bat iis selling obamacare according to his twitter messages and profile..
It’s an election season and I haven’t seen a single Dem commercial....
The WHBC has been entered into evidence since June of 2012 by attorneys for the Mississippi Democratic Party for U.S. District Court Judge Henry T. Wingate in Orly Taitz’s Mississippi eligibility challenge, along with a Certified Letter of Verification for the birth certificate from the Hawaii Registrar of Vital Statistics.
You can see both documents on pages 11 & 12 at the following link:
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/96289285
Judge Wingate has not yet ruled on the probative value of those documents.
The Alabama Supreme Court has also not yet ruled.
So you're supposing that there exists for purposes of making a verification two versions of a record, an original and an amended version, and that the custodian is stating information "matches" because he's comparing what's proffered to the original and disregarding the amendment(s)? If so, then "true and complete copy" (or whatever language you prefer) doesn't solve the problem as the custodian could equally disregard the amendment and make the comparison only as against that same original.
What point you're trying to make is lost here.
This point is answered in my Post #233 to Red Steel.
Your grasp of public records operations is no better than his. A custodian 50 or more years after the fact has no way to verify the circumstances of a document's creation or to verify its accuracy. Yet, such information on the public records is routinely accepted (in court and in other venues) based solely on the attestation of what the records say and without any further verification of accuracy.
Your quibble here is with the Framers who drafted the Constitution as written above without any express "unless State A doesn't trust State B's records" exception. The Framers could have left it up to each State to employ its own rules or discretion for acceptance of Sister State's acts and records. But they didn't. They embodied mutual recognition as a Constitutional principle.
So, yes, that means they could foresee there would be instances where the result isn't to the suiting of someone in another state.
So go argue with the Framers. But the Constitution as written means you have one mighty weak argument here.
Alien parentage was never a fact in dispute as Obama had always acknowledged his father was Kenyan.
So that question is both legally and factually irrelevant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.