I don’t know Zimmerman’s character in detail, but on its own, that painting of the FL AG is pretty funny!
April is full of rage against a guy who defended himself from being killed by a violent criminal.
Yep, she’s a liberal.
He’s got all the right people tee’d off. Funny to see the art critics with their panties in a bunch, those hypocrite pigs.
He’d better be careful with the copyright situation though.
How many liberal artists over the years have painted variations of “Guerrillero Heroico” - that iconic painting from a photograph of Marxist Che Guevara? I don’t think any of them ever got sued but then again, they “appropriated” the art for liberal causes so I guess that’s different.
Hillary continues to be a great American……………………..huh?
This whole story was a COMPLETE non-starter but for the politically-driven LibTards in FL.
Let’s look at some Police Blotters for, oh, ANY day of the year, and I’ll bet you’ll find a similar situation playing out in SOME ‘gated community.’
Thanks, Media! Thanks ‘April Dawn.’ Pretty sure they will not REST until this man is dead, too. Like a dog on a bone, they are! *SPIT*
I believe the first picture George did was also from another source.
April, being ignorant and stupid is a bad way to slog through life. But you deserve it. /spit
Zimmerman should sue Christian Viveros-Faune for slander for this statement, and sue April Dawn for repeating it.
One thing for certain is that the msm vermin have a Palinesque hatred for George Zimmerman. So it’s impossible to tell what’s actually true about him.
All you have to do is call it a rendition. I have Picasso’s hanging all over my house. Since I can’t afford one I just copy it and have it framed. As long as you don’t advertise it as an original you should be OK.
From linkedin:
Her work is regularly featured in VIBE/VIBE Vixen Magazine, and The Source magazine.
1. Has the material you have taken from the original work been transformed by adding new expression or meaning?
2. Was value added to the original by creating new information, new aesthetics, new insights, and understandings?
If it is parody - and this certainly is - then it is given broad latitude. And then there is the issue that Zimmerman is engaging in political speech which is the most hallowed of protected activities.
Like Warhol's Campbell Soup painting, Zimmerman's work is certainly transformative.
I won't enter the debate on artistic merit. It is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
That is not a copy of their photo. Several things were changed. The cobalt blue curtains in the photo background, gone in his painting. The alizarin red dress, gone in painting, replaced with a yellow ocher, orange under painting, topped and textured with carmine red. The face is turned into a caricature due to the harsh and heavy rendering.
Let’s put it this way, even if Zim does have to pay for using that photo, in the end, it will become worth it. Now, the painting has been advertised for free around the world. Good for Zim. I do wonder, what are his relatives doing for income, can they now show their faces in public again? Shellie is likely shopping for a Victoria Secrets dress to wear when she tries to win Zim’s ‘love’ (I.e. income from paintings) back. Those don’t ususally come in her size though.
"Or... I could put out how much U offered me 2.."
I find that to be the most interesting part of this article.
Help me out here, everybody . . . why doesn’t this fall under the lib exemption: “truth to power?”
That prosecutor NEEDS MOCKING.
Nothing “horrible” about THAT!
I keep looking and looking, but I have yet to see the horrible part.