Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
Title shortened
BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces the Game Changing Achievement of the Generation of Millions of Watts of Power from the Conversion of Water Fuel to a New Form of Hydrogen
Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Email More
BusinessWire · Jan. 14, 2014 | Last Updated: Jan. 14, 2014 5:01 AM ET
BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced that it has produced millions of watts of power with its breakthrough Solid Fuel-Catalyst-Induced-Hydrino-Transition (SF-CIHT) patent pending technology in its laboratories.
Using a proprietary water-based solid fuel confined by two electrodes of a SF-CIHT cell, and applying a current of 12,000 amps through the fuel, water ignites into an extraordinary flash of power. The fuel can be continuously fed into the electrodes to continuously output power. BlackLight has produced millions of watts of power in a volume that is one ten thousandths of a liter corresponding to a power density of over an astonishing 10 billion watts per liter. As a comparison, a liter of BlackLight power source can output as much power as a central power generation plant exceeding the entire power of the four former reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
Our safe, non-polluting power-producing system catalytically converts the hydrogen of the H2O-based solid fuel into a non-polluting product, lower-energy state hydrogen called “Hydrino”, by allowing the electrons to fall to smaller radii around the nucleus. The energy release of H2O fuel, freely available in the humidity in the air, is one hundred times that of an equivalent amount of high-octane gasoline. The power is in the form of plasma, a supersonic expanding gaseous ionized physical state of the fuel comprising essentially positive ions and free electrons that can be converted directly to electricity using highly efficient magnetohydrodynamic converters. Simply replacing the consumed H2O regenerates the fuel. Using readily-available components, BlackLight has developed a system engineering design of an electric generator that is closed except for the addition of H2O fuel and generates ten million watts of electricity, enough to power ten thousand homes. Remarkably, the device is less than a cubic foot in volume. To protect its innovations and inventions, multiple worldwide patent applications have been filed on BlackLight’s proprietary technology.
This breakthrough transformational power technology can be witnessed in a live demonstration hosted by BlackLight of on January 28th at 11 AM. Details and updates will be posted at the company website (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Those interested in attending can contact BlackLight to preregister for this limited availability event.
Applications and markets for the SF-CIHT cell extend across the global power spectrum, including thermal, stationary electrical power, motive, and defense. Given the independence from existing infrastructure, grid in the case of electricity and fuels in the case of motive power, the SF-CIHT power source is a further game changer for all forms of transportation: automobile, freight trucks, rail, marine, aviation, and aerospace in that the power density is one million times that of the engine of a Formula One racer, and ten million times that of a jet engine. The SF-CIHT cell uses cheap, abundant, nontoxic, commodity chemicals, with no apparent long-term supply issues that might preclude commercial, high volume manufacturing. The projected cost of the SF-CIHT cell is between $10 and $100/kW compared to over one hundred times that for conventional power sources of electricity.
BlackLight’s previously reported pioneering solid fuels and CIHT electrochemical cell use the same catalyst as the newly invented SF-CIHT cells, and they served as a model for Dr. Mills to invent the breakthrough plasma producing SF-CIHT cell. These background technologies have been validated by industry. BlackLight’s results of multiples of the maximum theoretical energy release for representative solid fuels was replicated at Perkin Elmer’s Field Application Laboratory at their facility using their commercial instrument. Moreover, our advanced CIHT electrochemical cell was independently replicated offsite as well.
“We at The ENSER Corporation have performed about thirty tests at our premises using BLP’s CIHT electrochemical cells of the type that were tested and reported by BLP in the Spring of 2012, and achieved the three specified goals,” said Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan, Engineering Fellow, of The ENSER Corporation. “We independently validated BlackLight’s results offsite by an unrelated highly qualified third party. We confirmed that hydrino was the product of any excess electricity observed by three analytical tests on the cell products, and determined that BlackLight Power had achieved fifty times higher power density with stabilization of the electrodes from corrosion.” Dr. Terry Copeland, who managed product development for several electrochemical and energy companies including DuPont Company and Duracell added, “Dr. James Pugh (then Director of Technology at ENSER) and Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan participated with me in the independent tests of CIHT cells at The ENSER Corporation’s Pinellas Park facility in Florida starting on November 28, 2012. We fabricated and tested CIHT cells capable of continuously producing net electrical output that confirmed the fifty-fold stable power density increase and hydrino as the product.”
The disclosure of one of BlackLight’s patent application that was recently-filed worldwide, its 10 MW electric SF-CIHT cell system engineering design and simulation, high-speed video of millions of watts of supersonically expanding SF-CIHT cell plasma, The ENSER Corporation and Dr. Terry Copeland validation reports on the prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the Perkin Elmer report on solid fuels are publicly available on BlackLight’s webpage (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Technical papers by BlackLight providing the experimental tests of plasma to electric conversion, results of excess energy production from solid fuels, results of continuous electricity production at fifty times higher power density than prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the detailed chemistry and identification of Hydrinos by ten analytical methods that laboratories can follow and replicate are given at http://www.blacklightpower.com/.
About BlackLight Power
BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source applicable to essentially all power applications such as thermal, electrical, automotive, trucking, rail, marine, aviation, aerospace, and defense. The BlackLight Process, the power source, is the process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom by forming Hydrinos. The SF-CIHT cell was invented by Dr. Mills to release this energy directly as electricity from water as the only source of fuel.
For more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Glossary:
BlackLight Process: A novel chemical process invented by Dr. Mills causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be released as a new primary energy source.
Hydrino: Hydrinos are a new form of hydrogen theoretically predicted by Dr. Mills and produced and characterized by BLP. Hydrinos are produced during the BlackLight Process as energy is released from the hydrogen atom as the electron transitions to a lower-energy state resulting in a smaller radius hydrogen atom. The identity of the dark matter of the universe as Hydrinos is supported by BlackLight’s spectroscopic and analytical results as well as astrophysical observations.
SF-CIHT Cell: Each SF-CIHT cell comprises two electrodes that confine a highly electrically conducive H2O-based solid fuel that serves as a source of reactants to form Hydrinos. A low-voltage, very high current (about one thousand times that of household currents) ignites the water to form hydrinos and cause a burst of plasma power of millions of watts that can be directly converted to electricity using proven plasma to electric power conversion technology such as a magnetohydrodynamic converter.
Magnetohydrodynamic Converter: An electrical generator that uses no moving parts. It comprises a magnet as in a conventional generator, but the conductor that moves in this case is the flowing plasma that produces a voltage at a pair of electrodes that are perpendicular to both the direction of plasma flow and the magnetic field of the magnet.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20140114005647/en/
Contacts
BlackLight Power, Inc. Media: Beata Stepien, 609-490-1090 Ex 125 Assistant for Dr. Randell L. Mills bstepien@blacklightpower.com
Wow. You really are a complete dunce
***Oh what are you whining about now? Did I mistype some unit? Was it supposed to be converted to Assholes/byte or some train nerd unit?
you can’t even keep up with your own side of the argument. You’re the one claiming that HTSC’s fundamentally change science in the same way LENR does.
***Yes it did. Before 1987, HTSCs were done in a completely different material, and then huge progress was made in Ceramics, which was completely nonobvious.
No they don’t.
***You can argue against what I didn’t express all you want, it’s still a straw argument.
I challenged you to find a claim
***I’ll fetch just as soon as you fetch. You never do, so why should I?
that they fundamentally violate some known physical law.
**So that you can force the conversation into a straw argument. Naturally, even when I didn’t go there, you did, continuing your high asshole index straw argument.
Now, I was willing to cut you a break,
***Horseshit.
and warn you that you won’t find anyone who says that, but I am also content to
***argue against the straw position you set up. As usual.
send you off on a wild goose chase. At least it will keep you off the streets tonight.
***Of course that’s what you do. You don’t really reason, you jump down to the gutter level intellect of logical fallacy on basically every post. Like the 9th grader you are.
If you’re determined, by all means, find me a physicist who says that the discovery of HTSC’s overthrows years of previously established scientific results.
***I’ll fetch just as soon as you fetch. But you don’t even answer simple questions, simple hypotheticals. You really are a complete dunce.
Go on. Bugger off.
***You first. If you’re such a grand scientist, why is it we don’t see you on the LENR theory threads? Because you’re a poseur.
And don’t come back until you do.
***You first, asshole.
And you can’t even address the hypothetical on the simplest level.
Is an energy density of 50 higher than an energy density of 10? Go ahead and use whatever units you want, we know how ridiculously anal you are about such things in your quest to ignore the science behind LENR claims.
So there were not 14,000 experiments, just 150 experiments repeated 14,000 times.
***Then you acknowledge this Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated at least 150 times, as per the review done by National Instruments. That means you are arguing against an established scientific fact.
So there were not 14,000 experiments, just 150 experiments repeated 14,000 times.
***If it were as you say, that’s 150*14000 replications. That situation is even more of an established scientific fact than what I’ve been saying. Jeez, you’re a dunce.
Now, was it 150 dead horses, or corpses, or the same corpse in 150 different poses? ‘Cause that’s what cold fusion is. A dead horse. And a bunch of poseurs with dead careers. 14000 times.
*** Jeez, you’re a dunce. A scientific fact isn’t a fact just because someone’s career hasn’t brought them fame? Or is it that they failed to suck on the guvmint teat and defraud the taxpayers like you did for all those years?
Careful.
You will be engulfed in a virtual tar baby concerning the true meaning of anything, as long as FraudZagonner is involved. Does he answer any question put to him? Is it power? Is it energy? Is it amps? Does it matter? Where does it say 83 volts? Does he address hypotheticals at 20,000 seconds of output, or the a hypothetical equal to 1 Watt + 1 Watt? How about 1 Asshole + 1 Asshole, is it 2 skeptopaths or are asshole skeptopaths worth more than genuine scientists looking for the truth?
Or was it simply a man in a red and white suit delivering
Guvmint jobs like his? When he sucks on the guvmint teat, does he output skittles along with his unicorn farts?
Are the units in lumps of coal or are they FraudZagonnerAssholes? Does FZ believe in Santa Clause jumping down the chimney at Christmas, unable to discern reality? Does it take BTU content to get that asshole to stop posting logical fallacies? And if that man did not ride the Polar Express what does it have to do with trains, who cares about trains? Does that 9th grader have any evidence that he published anything even remotely useful the Thermal CalculatorTM?
These and many other deliberate and comical obfuscations await you in the Skeptopathic world, where nothing is real, including scientists who’ve spent entire careers in Nuclear Physics. But even on the slightest is hypothetical, FRaudZagonner can’t answer the question, but prefers to just hurl insults like “Kevmo rules. [And all may be found on this increasingly ridiculous thread.]
There, I fixed it for ya.
vmpolesov
Jumped on a bandwagon when he saw assholes ganging up on someone, and PRESUMED that it was over some major point of science. He didn’t look upthread to verify it. But at least with all this one-sided invective, it means the thread will stay open so he’s provided a service in a small way.
The day Moonboy injects logic into the discussion on the science behind these matters will be the day after Rossi sells his 5000th unit.
You would no doubt be interested in Dilbert’s power generating invention, where he extracts methane from people’s rear ends. It involves shoving a tube up your rectum, so we know that you would derive double enjoyment from it.
Look at Dilbert’s invention, vmp! It’s your dream come true! And when I tell you to shove it up your ass, it will finally be power generating advice.
You asked...
I Asked...
But I asked first, so until you answer simple stuff, there’s no reason for me to play fetch.
Why is it somehow a lack of knowledge when I don’t answer your 100W lightbulb question but it isn’t a lack of knowledge when you can’t answer what 1W + 1W is? Is an energy density of 150 (use whatever units you see fit) greater than an energy density of 100? Pretty simple stuff that even a 6th grader can answer.
What are you whining about now?
Kevmo, I’m telling you in the nicest possible way, blp claims (’power density’) are a load of bollocks.
***Then it should be easy for you to address the questions. To be candid, I wasn’t even thinking about BLP when I was asking about power density.
Kevmo, please do not invest any of your own money in this. I may ridicule what you say. But genuinely do not want to see the naive taken in and suffer financially from an obvious scam.Kevmo, please do not invest any of your own money in this. I may ridicule what you say. But genuinely do not want to see the naive taken in and suffer financially from an obvious scam.
***If it’s a scam, at best it is to the tune of $60M. The controlled-hot-fusion scam is to the tune of $600B, 4 orders of magnitude higher than the one you’re so “concerned” about. Do we see you on hot-fusion threads generating 4 orders of magnitude more invective than here? No. Concern troll is very concerned.
Kevmo, if on the other hand you are getting paid to hype this company, as one EE to another, I urge you to review the IEEE code of ethics and ask yourself if promoting this company is ethical.
***I would say the same thing to you about the hot-fusion scam and your ethics, which are 4 orders of magnitude out of whack compared to anything discussed in LENR.
Kevmo, if on the other hand you are getting paid to hype this company, as one EE to another, I urge you to review the IEEE code of ethics and ask yourself if promoting this company is ethical.
Or based on some Chinese guy supposedly adding up 14,000 successful trials.
***Wow. You guys are throwing the Chinese Academy of Science under the bus? You’re assuming they can’t even COUNT?
WOW. Just WOW.
Perhaps it’s just because they’re chinese. You know, cultural bigotry. Then how about the 150 peer reviewed replications cited by National Instruments? Are they under the bus as well? Probably. Just WOW.
Nope, just your silly source.
Perhaps it’s just because they’re chinese. You know, cultural bigotry.
Right, my mockery of your silliness is due to bigotry. LOL!
tell you what kevmo. if blacklight power ever produces a commercial power reactor generating 1MW of power I will admit it was wrong
Chinese Academy of Science IS my source. Just look at all the organizations, companies, and scientists you guys throw under the bus. The pile is getting bigger with each passing month.
They listed all 14,000 "successful tests"? Show me.
The pile is getting bigger with each passing month.
Yup, that's a big pile of nuts you keep throwing at us.
Yup. They sure did. And all I get from you skeptopaths is crickets, bullshit, snide remarks, insults, and anti-science Luddite remarks.
—————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85732.html—————————
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.