Posted on 01/06/2014 8:10:13 PM PST by SunkenCiv
We explore the general astrobiological significance of F-type main-sequence stars with masses between 1.2 and 1.5 Msun.
Special consideration is given to stellar evolutionary aspects due to nuclear main-sequence evolution. DNA is taken as a proxy for carbon-based macromolecules following the paradigm that extraterrestrial biology may be most likely based on hydrocarbons. Consequently, the DNA action spectrum is utilized to represent the impact of the stellar UV radiation.
Planetary atmospheric attenuation is taken into account based on parameterized attenuation functions. We found that the damage inflicted on DNA for planets at Earth-equivalent positions is between a factor of 2.5 and 7.1 higher than for solar-like stars, and there are intricate relations for the time-dependence of damage during stellar main-sequence evolution.
If attenuation is considered, smaller factors of damage are obtained in alignment to the attenuation parameters. This work is motivated by earlier studies indicating that the UV environment of solar-type stars is one of the most decisive factors in determining the suitability of exosolar planets and exomoons for biological evolution and sustainability.
(Excerpt) Read more at astrobiology.com ...
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
“Planetary atmospheric attenuation is taken into account based on parameterized attenuation functions.”
http://www.johnspeedie.com/healy/saywhat.wav
Ok I have heard of A-List and B-List stars, but was wondering who an F-List start might be. Perhaps those that did not make the cut for Dancing with the ‘Stars’?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.