Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No more incandescent light bulbs after January 1
wthr ^ | 11 8 13

Posted on 11/08/2013 5:58:27 AM PST by InvisibleChurch

Starting next year, it's lights out for certain types of light bulbs in the United States. You'll no longer be able to buy an incandescent light bulb starting January 1, 2014.

Under the Energy Efficiency and Security Act of 2007, signed into law by then- President George W. Bush, light bulbs must become more efficient in terms of energy used for generated light.

That means incandescent lights are phased out. And you'll reduced to choose between a compact fluorescent (CFL) or light emitting diode (LED) bulb.

For example, instead of burning 60 watts when you turn on the lights, you could use about 9.5 to 12 watts, depending on what type of replacement bulb you install.

(Excerpt) Read more at wthr.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: incandescent; lightbulb; lightbulbs; theend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
to whom does this not apply?
1 posted on 11/08/2013 5:58:27 AM PST by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

I am stocked up till a time I estimate will exceed my lifetime.


2 posted on 11/08/2013 5:59:39 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
You'll no longer be able to buy an incandescent light bulb starting January 1, 2014.

FALSE

3 posted on 11/08/2013 5:59:58 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Another “bright” idea by liberals. In a very real way its symbolic of the decline of America.


4 posted on 11/08/2013 6:00:24 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

I thought this had been set aside due to the enormous backlash on it. I may be wrong but I do notice the incandescent bulbs are reappearing on the shelves.


5 posted on 11/08/2013 6:00:38 AM PST by ProudFossil (" I never did give anyone hell. I just told the truth and they thought it was hell." Harry Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

“If you like your light bulbs, you can keep your light bulbs. No one is going to take them away from you . . .”


6 posted on 11/08/2013 6:00:40 AM PST by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Right ... I remember this was rescinded


7 posted on 11/08/2013 6:00:47 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If true, yet another reason to thank Bush II for paving the way for Barack I.


8 posted on 11/08/2013 6:01:21 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

For some reason the lumens value is not accurately potrayed on the energy saver light bulbs. Go buy an incadescent bulb and an energy saver bulb with the same lumens rating and screw them in and tell me which is brighter? Incadescent every time. Have done this to test it myself.


9 posted on 11/08/2013 6:02:20 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Back in early 2007, Congress was working on the Energy Independence and Security Act to address the problem of inefficient lightbulbs. When word got out that they planned to ban incandescents, forcing everyone to buy expensive compact fluorescent lights (CFLs)—those flickering bulbs that look like pig’s tails—people were outraged. Many resorted to hoarding, buying up as many incandescent bulbs as possible before they were gone for good.

There was one problem: The government never banned incandescents. The new law was enacted to simply phase out inefficient lightbulbs in, as Congress stated, “a technology-neutral way.” The new law doesn’t ban incandescent lightbulbs, nor does it demand the use of CFLs or any other kind of bulb. It simply sets forth energy efficiency targets that go into effect in two phases: first in 2012, and again in 2020.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/home/improvement/energy-efficient/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-lightbulb-law-14789203

- - - - - - - - -

For those looking to replace their incandescent bulbs, the first option is, well, incandescent bulbs. One of the biggest myths about the phaseout plan is that it targets traditional filament-based bulbs, but what it really does is impose higher energy efficiency standards on all lighting options. In 2011, Philips debuted its EcoVantage line, an incandescent bulb that is up to 30 percent more energy efficient than traditional bulbs. These halogen-based bulbs, which cost just a little more than traditional bulbs, produce the same warm light that consumers have come to expect from incandescents, but last three times longer and meet the new energy-efficiency standards.

http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/02/20/preparing-for-bulb-ban/


10 posted on 11/08/2013 6:04:28 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
They needed to save all that electricity to run the NSA's server farms...

Is it just a coincidence these things are screw shaped?

I have a stash of rough service bulbs which should last a while. Hopefully, we can get this nonsense sorted out by the time I run out, if not, we'll probably be back to using candles and lanterns.

11 posted on 11/08/2013 6:04:44 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
to whom does this not apply?

We have enough 40-60-75-100 watt light bulbs to last until global warming becomes real...sometime around the 22nd century.

In addition, I have several dozen 120 watt internal flood lights which are very hard to find and are currently priced higher than gold.

I like my current light bulbs, and I am going to keep my current light bulbs.

PERIOD....EXCLAMATION POINT!!!!

12 posted on 11/08/2013 6:05:20 AM PST by USS Alaska (If I could...I would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I am stocked up till a time I estimate will exceed my lifetime.

They're coming to take your stash away.

13 posted on 11/08/2013 6:05:20 AM PST by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProudFossil
As a side note ... I HAVE changed all my bulbs AND I have little teeny tiny led's in candle lights (with photo sensitive on/off) in 12 windows in the front of our home, and my electric is down to about $80 from around the $110 area.

I hate to admit it, but the swirly things are money savers.

14 posted on 11/08/2013 6:05:30 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

I guess this is like the water saving commodes that require you to flush them twice instead of once...


15 posted on 11/08/2013 6:05:49 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
I took out the CFL bulbs I had put in as an experiment, and replaced them with halogen bulbs. I prefer halogen light to incandescent, and MUCH prefer over CFL.

CFL bulbs produce an odd light that I find irritating.

16 posted on 11/08/2013 6:08:09 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie

I think I have enough helpers to make sure that does not happen and if it does, well, my lifetime supply will still be just that, a lifetime supply!


17 posted on 11/08/2013 6:08:59 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Another “bright” idea by liberals. In a very real way its symbolic of the decline of America.

Yep, that Rep. Fred Upton, a republican and GW Bush stuck us with this stupid law. They were liberals, they are liberals and yet people still vote for democrat lite.

18 posted on 11/08/2013 6:10:46 AM PST by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

I guess this is like the water saving commodes that require you to flush them twice instead of once...

And in “government-think” that is a good idea, because two 1.6 gal. flushes is better than one 5 gal flush.


19 posted on 11/08/2013 6:10:47 AM PST by Corey Ohlis (Visualize Swirled Peas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
We have enough 40-60-75-100 watt light bulbs to last until global warming becomes real...sometime around the 22nd century.

Don't worry, the collapse of western civilization, triggered by the long-term failure of the power grids, will make light bulbs a distant memory long before that.

20 posted on 11/08/2013 6:11:55 AM PST by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson