Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why was the NPS.gov site made unavailable ?
Nps.gov ^ | 2004 | Nps

Posted on 10/03/2013 9:58:30 AM PDT by jilliane

If the site is hosted internally, then what costs are there to leave the site up with no changes? If it's externally hosted then hosting fees are paid for in advance

(Excerpt) Read more at nps.gov ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: dearleader; hissyfit; npsgov; obamadrama; obamasfault
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: jilliane
If the site is hosted internally, then what costs are there to leave the site up with no changes? If it's externally hosted then hosting fees are paid for in advance

The numbers don't matter, silly!
Obama and his flying monkeys' goal is maximum pain to the greatest number of people.

...and then "blame" it all on the Republicans.

That Bullshit* is no longer credible.

*BULLSHIT

41 posted on 10/03/2013 1:44:23 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Well I figured out why they redirected the sites thanks to the poster on this thread who’s defending the administration’s decision.

The fact is that these informational type sites (not complex builds, not script intensive, no ecommerce etc. etc) don’t need much after they’re built. Though I love IT, IT is notorious for creating the vision of everything that can go wrong, and as a result, why they are indispensable. It doesn’t mean things can’t go wrong, just that the picture is often far worse than the reality.

So, if they left these low tech sites up and nothing went wrong for weeks, then what does that say about their relevance?


42 posted on 10/03/2013 1:53:31 PM PDT by jilliane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
-—”We’ll make these ignorant buffoons hurt and realize just how much they depend on the government US!”

This is all about him, you know...
Megalodoofus!

My White House.
My Supreme Court!
My Secret Service!
My Armed Forces!
My Air Force One!
My Monuments!
My National Parks!
My Senate!
My Constitution!
My cookie!

Our SSOS!

43 posted on 10/03/2013 1:58:38 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jilliane

All federal websites are closed and redirecting to a specific page which blames the pubbies.

It takes no effort to maintain a web page. Once designed and uploaded it just sits on the server. This is all a temper tantrum on the part of the little dictator.


44 posted on 10/03/2013 2:27:35 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
Maybe they don’t want millions of people grinding their asses over the WW2 vet fiasco.’Cause if they had a place to leave a comment,I’d rip them a new one.

you're right!

45 posted on 10/03/2013 2:29:48 PM PDT by uncitizen (Obamacare IS TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The IT folks aren’t to blame. The order to redirect came from the White House. They were given specific wording with not deviation allowed.


46 posted on 10/03/2013 2:29:49 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wrencher

It doesn’t need constant hands-on maintenance.


47 posted on 10/03/2013 2:31:01 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jilliane

You familiar with the saying (applicable to consulting and government contracting) that if you aren’t part of the solution there’s damn good money to be made prolonging the problem ...?


48 posted on 10/03/2013 3:52:21 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jilliane

“Lol....your support of the administration is understood.”

lol back, as is your hysteria over a simple web page.

Furthermore, your clueless comment at #42 shows how weak your technical grasp is. Do you really think some meager static site is a concern and on its own server? The modern server is redundant in all aspects and hosts many sites, using many DB methods, even more content management systems, and is backed up to a remote silo that requires frequent exchange of tapes.

Yes, it actually needs to be staffed to fix the parts that fail and you have no clue of the underlying technology while you move your animated gif into the correct corner and agonize over what color and font to use. Good thing you are not having to support something important with your meager grasp of how it all works.

lol @ your “support the administration”. Silly html-izer, find a real issue.


49 posted on 10/03/2013 4:24:45 PM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

Exactly.


50 posted on 10/03/2013 4:34:28 PM PDT by jilliane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wrencher

Your insults only confirm I am right. If you were as skilled as you insist, you’d be far less defensive and patronizing and would try to educate. Instead, you cop to insults so I highly doubt from your limited site language and solutions that you manage any servers...sounds like you are pretending you manage multitudes of sites for AWS or Rackspace...and your silly references to godaddy and gifs shows you don’t manage anything too sophisticated so let’s just end this nonsense and leave it that you have gone to the wall to defend the administration. BTW, check out the dept of labor site which makes use of what I suggested and shows they are doing what I said on bigger sites...leave them up but don’t update, and message accordingly. Of course it’s not about a small site which was my point all along...they went to more trouble to redirect it than leave it. Best regards.


51 posted on 10/03/2013 5:00:10 PM PDT by jilliane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wrencher

Hmmm another post on this...

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3074542/posts


52 posted on 10/03/2013 5:38:27 PM PDT by jilliane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jilliane

Shall I follow you over there and educate the ignorant on your behalf? Reposting stories is the FR way, search engines are beyond many here.

I hardly care, persist on your frivolous crusade. A govt web site, or 10 or 100 are down, oh the horror, the horror,


53 posted on 10/03/2013 6:35:21 PM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson