Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blackbird fly, blackbird fly / Into the light of the dark black night : the SR-71 Blackbird
americandigest ^

Posted on 08/22/2013 1:59:39 PM PDT by virgil283

"It is a race this jet will not let us lose. The Mach eases to 3.5 as we crest 80,000 feet. We are a bullet now - except faster. We hit the turn, and I feel some relief as our nose swings away from a country we have seen quite enough of. Screaming past Tripoli , our phenomenal speed continues to rise, and the screaming Sled pummels the enemy one more time, laying down a parting sonic boom. In seconds, we can see nothing but the expansive blue of the Mediterranean . I realize that I still have my left hand full-forward and we're continuing to rocket along in maximum afterburner. The TDI now shows us Mach numbers, not only new to our experience but flat out scary." ......

(Excerpt) Read more at americandigest.org ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aviation; blackbird; mildenhall; sr71
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
"So it was with great surprise, when at the end of one of my presentations, someone asked, “what was the slowest you ever flew the Blackbird?” This was a first. After giving it some thought, I was reminded of a story that I had never shared before, and relayed the following.

I was flying the SR-71 out of RAF Mildenhall, England, with my back-seater, Walt Watson; we were returning from a mission over Europe and the Iron Curtain when we received a radio transmission from home base. As we scooted across Denmark in three minutes, we learned that a small RAF base in the English countryside had requested an SR-71 fly-past. The air cadet commander there was a former Blackbird pilot, and thought it would be a motivating moment for the young lads to see the mighty SR-71 perform a low approach. No problem, we were happy to do it. After a quick aerial refueling over the North Sea, we proceeded to find the small airfield.

Walter had a myriad of sophisticated navigation equipment in the back seat, and began to vector me toward the field. Descending to subsonic speeds, we found ourselves over a densely wooded area in a slight haze. Like most former WWII British airfields, the one we were looking for had a small tower and little surrounding infrastructure. Walter told me we were close and that I should be able to see the field, but I saw nothing. Nothing but trees as far as I could see in the haze. We got a little lower, and I pulled the throttles back from 325 knots we were at. With the gear up, anything under 275 was just uncomfortable. Walt said we were practically over the field—yet; there was nothing in my windscreen. I banked the jet and started a gentle circling maneuver in hopes of picking up anything that looked like a field. Meanwhile, below, the cadet commander had taken the cadets up on the catwalk of the tower in order to get a prime view of the fly-past. It was a quiet, still day with no wind and partial gray overcast. Walter continued to give me indications that the field should be below us but in the overcast and haze, I couldn’t see it. The longer we continued to peer out the window and circle, the slower we got. With our power back, the awaiting cadets heard nothing. I must have had good instructors in my flying career, as something told me I better cross-check the gauges. As I noticed the airspeed indicator slide below 160 knots, my heart stopped and my adrenalin-filled left hand pushed two throttles full forward. At this point we weren’t really flying, but were falling in a slight bank. Just at the moment that both afterburners lit with a thunderous roar of flame (and what a joyous feeling that was) the aircraft fell into full view of the shocked observers on the tower. Shattering the still quiet of that morning, they now had 107 feet of fire-breathing titanium in their face as the plane leveled and accelerated, in full burner, on the tower side of the infield, closer than expected, maintaining what could only be described as some sort of ultimate knife-edge pass.

Quickly reaching the field boundary, we proceeded back to Mildenhall without incident. We didn’t say a word for those next 14 minutes. After landing, our commander greeted us, and we were both certain he was reaching for our wings. Instead, he heartily shook our hands and said the commander had told him it was the greatest SR-71 fly-past he had ever seen, especially how we had surprised them with such a precise maneuver that could only be described as breathtaking. He said that some of the cadet’s hats were blown off and the sight of the plan form of the plane in full afterburner dropping right in front of them was unbelievable. Walt and I both understood the concept of “breathtaking” very well that morning, and sheepishly replied that they were just excited to see our low approach.

As we retired to the equipment room to change from space suits to flight suits, we just sat there-we hadn’t spoken a word since “the pass.” Finally, Walter looked at me and said, “One hundred fifty-six knots. What did you see?” Trying to find my voice, I stammered, “One hundred fifty-two.” We sat in silence for a moment. Then Walt said, “Don’t ever do that to me again!” And I never did.

A year later, Walter and I were having lunch in the Mildenhall Officer’s club, and overheard an officer talking to some cadets about an SR-71 fly-past that he had seen one day. Of course, by now the story included kids falling off the tower and screaming as the heat of the jet singed their eyebrows. Noticing our HABU patches, as we stood there with lunch trays in our hands, he asked us to verify to the cadets that such a thing had occurred. Walt just shook his head and said, “It was probably just a routine low approach; they’re pretty impressive in that plane.” Impressive indeed."....

http://www.vfp62.com/SR-71_flyby.html

1 posted on 08/22/2013 1:59:39 PM PDT by virgil283
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: virgil283

Why must you post this as I am about to go to bed? ;)

I love SR threads. They always result in lotsa happy.


2 posted on 08/22/2013 2:05:34 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

Thanks very much for this.


3 posted on 08/22/2013 2:08:53 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

WOW


4 posted on 08/22/2013 2:14:09 PM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

No “How fast?” story is complete without the “How slow?” story.


5 posted on 08/22/2013 2:16:10 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283


6 posted on 08/22/2013 2:19:16 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283
...back from 325 knots we were at. With the gear up, anything under 275 was just uncomfortable.... As I noticed the airspeed indicator slide below 160 knots...

Note to the non-aviators: When "halving" airspeed from 325 to 160, lift is "quartered", it being proportional to the square of the airspeed.

They were seconds from "fireball".

7 posted on 08/22/2013 2:19:35 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

My favorite fact about the SR is that it has to be refueled immediately after take-off since the seals leak gas like a sieve when it’s on the ground and the seals don’t close until they get heated up at altitude. At least that’s what I heard.


8 posted on 08/22/2013 2:27:03 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

We used to watch those babies take off while we were TDY at BEALE AFB! What a sight! Our KC-135Qs were specially modified for refueling them.


9 posted on 08/22/2013 2:28:55 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

bump


10 posted on 08/22/2013 2:29:31 PM PDT by real saxophonist (All you poor, all you needy, all you're doin' is givin' to the greedy... Temptations, 'Power')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

when one considers this plane was conceived and designed in the early 60’s, then the whole business of how and where the titanium came from, the SR is a great story let alone a great aircraft.

Every time I see the one at the Boeing flight museum, I still marvel at the design.


11 posted on 08/22/2013 2:30:33 PM PDT by llevrok ("It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words....." - Geo. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I have been a SR nut for years. My daughter worked on the 117 and the 22 at Holloman. She brought me to the Davis museum where one is stored and had never seen one in person.

Short version. Stood there, mouth agape for a while marveling at that 60s tech. 50s really ;)


12 posted on 08/22/2013 2:41:51 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

Kelly Johnson was an aeronautical genius. Plus, the plane is just bad ass looking.


13 posted on 08/22/2013 2:57:10 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
The SR 71 has a larger fuel tank than the A 12. That is why the 71 is longer than the A 12.

I don't know about the need to refuel after take off, but one of those pilots talking about flying the A 12 over Korea and Viet Nam in 67-68 mention the need to refuel both before and after their over flight.

All that info about the U2 in the 50s and the A11/A12 in the 60s at Area 51 plus the CIA flights in 67-68 were declassified in 2011. There was much published at that time including the National Geographic's show on that.

14 posted on 08/22/2013 3:08:12 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

WANT.
Oh, wait..I’m an American.
HAVE!!


15 posted on 08/22/2013 3:22:03 PM PDT by Radagast the Fool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Experienced a fly by some years back during an air show at Travis. Had to plug my ears when it blasted off.


16 posted on 08/22/2013 3:26:53 PM PDT by spawn44 ( MOO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

To all of you SR buffs; get a copy of Skunk Works by Ben Rich. It goes into detail about how the U2, SR 71 and the F 117 were developed. The whole thing is amazing. Particularly how they came up with the multi-faceted shape of the 117. It actually came from an obscure research paper done by a Russian!


17 posted on 08/22/2013 3:37:25 PM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

I was privileged to have as a friend an SR-71 pilot back in the 1970s. He was a full-bird colonel and patiently answered my dumb questions about the aircraft.


18 posted on 08/22/2013 4:13:29 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technically right
Particularly how they came up with the multi-faceted shape of the 117. It actually came from an obscure research paper done by a Russian!

Dr. Pytr Ufimstef was the Russian physicist who derived the equations for minimizing radar return to the transmitter by an angled surface. He took his findings to the KGB who determined that such science had no military value whatsoever and allowed him to openly publish his findings. They came to the conclusion that any airframe based on his science could not fly. And they were right. What they did not have was the computer-based fly-by-wire technology that we had, which allows unstable airframes to reliably fly. And the rest is history.

19 posted on 08/22/2013 6:09:14 PM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan

Exactly right!!!


20 posted on 08/22/2013 7:11:18 PM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson