Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PoloSec

Question for those who no courtroom process, how is it determine who would go first in closing arguments, and is there an advantage to being first or last?


511 posted on 07/10/2013 7:56:29 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies ]


To: PoloSec

prosecution first...


514 posted on 07/10/2013 7:58:09 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

ROH Ro - Witness mentioned a 15 round magazine. Heads exploding at HLNMSNBCetc


518 posted on 07/10/2013 7:58:36 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

advantage is facts in evidence....


521 posted on 07/10/2013 7:59:10 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Defense always has the last say, I believe.


522 posted on 07/10/2013 7:59:24 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
Question for those who no courtroom process, how is it determine who would go first in closing arguments

The side with the burden of proof, the prosecution, always goes first. They will start and split the total time they have for argument between the initial argument and rebuttal. The defense goes after the first argument by the State. So the arguemnt goes: State, Defense, State for rebuttal. If things go like in my jurisdiction.

537 posted on 07/10/2013 8:01:43 AM PDT by lawdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson