She has a stinker of a case.
Actually, that is only if she was part of the scam. A REAL judge would have had a simple case. Directed verdict would have come early and hard, with a good scolding to the prosecution.
It’s a stinker for her because she wants a particular verdict and zero - yes ZERO - evidence supports it.
"It’s a stinker for her because she wants a particular verdict and zero - yes ZERO - evidence supports it."
Was Nelson the first judge in this trial? Did she replace any previous judges before her?
