Posted on 05/01/2013 8:11:44 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.
Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.
Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:
“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”
But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. It’s on page 33 in the document below.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
What is it you do not understand, Red?
Does not the inspired fervor of Obama's supporters convince you that he is indeed a Divine Being? That of course means that:
there is one BC for Obama The Father
Another for Obama the Son,
and of course a third for Obama The Holy Ghost.
Of course they do not match, as each illustrates a different aspect of The Obama Trinity. If you were an Obamaphone client, this would be explained to you in an app.
JW:”If you want my opinion...”
Actually, I don’t think there are many on this thread who do.
Interesting how you still didn’t address Windflier’s question...
All these questions about citizenship have almost eclipsed the equal crime of the cover-up which, as we have seen in the past, is often the bigger problem in the long run.
Tsk tsk.
I still say you get paid by the word to post here.
When Obama's White House Birf Certificate was published, he about swore up and down telling us it was totally authentic. LoL.
And your disdain for the Founding generation, and what they actually had to say, marks YOU as a phony conservative, too.
You may think opposing Obama makes you a conservative. It doesn't. Conservatives conserve. They respect our history, our Constitution, and our Founding Fathers.
Actually, I don’t think there are many on this thread who do. Interesting how you still didn’t address Windflier’s question...
JW Fogblower isn't ever going to give an honest, satisfactory answer to any question which would cast Obama in a bad light.
A month or so ago I asked him a purely hypothetical question regarding how the architects of a new nation's constitution would go about setting the citizenship standards for the office of President, and you should have seen him dance. Fred Astaire would have been jealous.
Obviously he couldn't answer it, because the only logical answer would have decimated all the hundreds of thousands of useless words he's posted on the subject.
I washed my hands of the fraud at that point and fingered him for the infiltrating disruptor he is.
That is a seriously sickening website. For seriously sickening people.
The question presumes to pretend to know what the Founding Fathers "would" do.
It's a bogus, BS question, because ANYBODY can claim the Founding Fathers would support their particular mission.
SURELY the Founding Fathers wouldn't force people to be deprived of having the fulfillment of being loved by the person they're in love with, would they?
SURELY the Founding Fathers wouldn't want people to suffer from a lack of healthcare, would they? They would want EVERYONE to have access to healthcare. Isn't the right to life the most fundamental right the Constitution protects? Isn't that the number one thing they fought for? And freedom, and the right to the pursuit of happiness?
And SURELY the Founding Fathers wouldn't want people to have to live in fear for their lives from all of these modern, semi-automatic weapons.
The fact is, using Windflier's argument of "oh, SURELY the Founding Fathers would have supported THIS," you can push any damn thing you want.
That's NOT how we determine what the Founding Fathers supported, and what they did not support.
We determine what they supported by what they SAID, and by what they DID. They didn't write,
No person shall be eligible to the Office of President, except one born on United States soil to two citizen parents, or a Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution.
No, they wrote:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.
And those words - "natural born Citizen" - had a very specific legal meaning that was understood by everybody.
And we can know what that meaning was, by what all of the most credible and authoritative people in our society wrote and said about it. Those who were legal experts. Those who wrote entire books on the Constitution, such as William Rawle and St. George Tucker. Those who were close to the Founders and Framers, such as Philip Mazzei and the Marquis de Lafayette.
And all of those historical figures - every single one of the AUTHORITATIVE AND CREDIBLE ones - were in agreement, with themselves and with the entire tradition and law of the United States. They all agreed that anyone born US soil was a natural born citizen, whether his or her parents was a citizen or not. And they agreed that Presidential eligibility required being born on US soil (no reference to parentage at all), or being "born a citizen."
But there are people who want to ignore that, it seems. They want to throw out every bit of historical evidence, and every highly-respected early American legal authority that says their theory is wrong.
Because they don't care about our highly-respected early American legal authorities. They care about the theory.
Oh, they're pretty full of themselves alright. They click over here to watch their hero, JW Fogblower throw cream puffs at Freepers, then applaud wildly every time he posts up a wall of copypasta.
For those who haven't yet seen the reports, Fogbow is paid group of leftist political disruptors, whose mission is to seek out right leaning websites and pose as like-minded conservatives to sow discord and doubt in those communities.
If such a group is so solidly backing our illustrious Jeff Winston, aka JW Fogblower, does that not raise just a hint of suspicion as to his real motives for being here?
You may think opposing Obama makes you a conservative. It doesn't.
- JW Fogblower
Maybe they simply enjoy seeing birther idiots getting slapped down again and again, and again.
I can't help it if someone over on some web site that I have nothing to do with enjoys watching the moo-cows who produce all the bullcrap get repeatedly poked with the lances.
It's a pretty entertaining spectator sport, after all.
Actually, I don’t think there are many on this thread who do.
If he doesn't want it, then he shouldn't ask for it. Ya think?
I'd say that's pretty elementary. Wouldn't you?
I was once declared the most "vile" FReeper by the FogDUmmies, I knew this without looking. ;^)
Heehee.
Boy, you just can't help letting your mask slip, can you?
The leftists posting at Fogbow are merely "someone", while your (alleged) fellow Freepers are "moo-cows"?
You're a fraud and a Fogblower, Jeff Winston. You just posted the above attack solely for the amusement of your liberal comrades, and you know it.
The vast majority of my fellow FReepers are genuine conservatives who respect and honor our Constitution and our laws.
And then there are, what? Maybe half a dozen or a dozen dedicated nutty conspiracy theorists who continually propagandize the site and push bogus and provably false Constitutional claims.
I honestly have no idea why you guys are tolerated.
Oh, stop with the ridiculous posing already. It's becoming embarrassing. "My fellow Freepers"? Someone get me a bucket. I think I'm gonna wretch.
Jeff, your posting history on Free Republic stands as a permanent testimony of your undying love and support for your master, Barack Obama. You've spent untold hours, days, weeks, and months here, fending off every possible challenge to his legitimacy, yet you have the gall to sit there acting offended that anyone would have the temerity to question your loyalty to conservatism and the U.S. Constitution?
Where's that bucket??
Just tell me one thing. What's your handle on Fogbow? No sense denying it any longer. 'Fess up, and be done with it.
Wear it as a badge of honor, my friend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.