Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Migrating planets caused meteor storm
ABC.au (Aussie, nothing to do with the American ABC, afaik) ^ | 3/25/13 | Stuart Gary

Posted on 03/26/2013 3:29:15 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Migrating planets caused meteor storm

Monday, 25 March 2013 Stuart Gary
ABC


Late Heavy Bomardment

New research supports the theory of planetary migration sparking a massive meteor storm that rocked the inner solar system 3.9 billion years ago(Source: NASA)

Meteor storm Migration of giant gas planets such as Jupiter created the biggest meteor storm in our solar system's history, according to a new study.

The research in the journal Nature Geoscience paints the clearest picture yet of the causes of the Late Heavy Bombardment, a cosmic tempest 3.9 billion years ago, which shaped the solar system we have today.

Scientists have long hypothesised the bombardment was caused by planetary migration, as Jupiter and Saturn moved closer in towards the Sun, while Neptune and Uranus moved further out from where they formed.

The gravitational effects caused by these migrations flung large numbers of meteors towards the inner solar system, where they collided with the terrestrial planets, including the Earth and Moon.

They are also credited with sending the asteroids and comets into the orbits they have today.

The new paper by researchers including lead author Dr Simone Marchi from the Southwest Research Institute, in Boulder Colorado, supports this hypothesis based on a new study of Apollo 16 Moon rocks, and two major types of meteoroids.

These include high-metal H-chondrites which make up almost half of all meteors and meteorites believed to have originated on the main belt asteroid Vesta.

Marchi and colleagues used argon isotope readings to determine when the impacts that created the samples occurred.

Their models and computer simulations indicate a period of intense meteor bombardment thoughout the inner solar system between 3.4 and 4.1 billion years ago, coinciding with the Late Heavy Bombardment.

The argon readings also indicate that the meteor samples could only have resulted from high velocity impacts in excess of 10 kilometres per second.

Migration debate

Support for the Late Heavy Bombardment theory had waned after revelations that some lunar zircons and breccias caused by impacts are older than four billion years, and some 3.9-billion-year crater impact dates were all derived from a single large impact site known as the Imbrium Basin.

These findings raised the prospect of an alternative idea that the dates represent impacts from a smoothly declining bombardment of leftover planetary construction material.

But planetary scientist Dr Simon O'Toole from the Australian Astronomical Observatory says the new paper addresses doubts about planetary migration in our solar system.

"The new argon calculations provide an important result filling holes in existing planetary migration models for the Late Heavy Bombardment theory," says O'Toole.

"Previous models predict only low velocity impacts under five kilometres per second occurring in the asteroid belt," says O'Toole.

"Higher velocities would have placed these asteroids on planet crossing orbits, crashing into planets and quickly emptying out the asteroid belt."

However the gravitational influence of the migrating planets changed the orbits of the asteroids sending them far above and below the orbital plane of solar system reducing the risks of a planetary collision, says O'Toole.

"[The study] provides us with a good foundation stone for a better understanding of the early solar system and how it got to look the way it does now."


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: bombardment; catastrophism; heavy; jupiter; migrating; neptune; planets; saturn; uranus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: BenLurkin

The other model (which I’d posted before, somewhere, maybe on FR) for the axial tip is the arrival, from the direction of one of the original poles, of the mass of liquid that makes up most of Uranus today; the previous mass of the planet might have been smaller, currently (it sez here) it is about 14 1/2 times the mass of Earth; its original density would have been higher. Arrival of this mass would have to have been sufficient to change the axis after some period of instability.

...or...

The arriving mass might have been what is now the rocky core, or (you guessed it) the secondary rocky core, producing the irregular mass distribution which has altered the axis of rotation until it’s nearly in the ecliptic. This is a bit cleaner, and more probable than the arrival of a long train of water of at planetary mass probably exceeding the mass of the Earth.


21 posted on 03/26/2013 6:31:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Interesting!


22 posted on 03/26/2013 7:03:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson