1 posted on
03/08/2013 7:34:13 PM PST by
haffast
To: haffast
Didn’t match the oldest human ancestor? Mus be descended from apes and pigs...
2 posted on
03/08/2013 7:37:09 PM PST by
null and void
(Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
To: haffast
Well we know the oldest female is a million years old so 338,000 don't seem that much..
3 posted on
03/08/2013 7:43:19 PM PST by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
To: haffast
Whodda thunk that some guy from South Carolina would prove that men have been around for 340,000 years. It’s a strange world we live in these days.
4 posted on
03/08/2013 7:43:27 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Progressive, Marxist liberals do not evolve, they morph into fascists.)
To: haffast
The father of all men is 340,000 years old
So before that they were all women?
5 posted on
03/08/2013 7:44:23 PM PST by
newheart
(The greatest trick the left ever pulled was convincing the world it was not a religion.)
To: haffast
“When I was young, we had nothing but pinups of Helen Thomas. And we liked it!”
8 posted on
03/08/2013 7:51:11 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
To: haffast
The father of all men is 340,000 years old I bet he chased women, smoked cigars and drank whiskey every day of his life too!
12 posted on
03/08/2013 8:02:55 PM PST by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
To: haffast
The father of all men is 340,000 years old And he didn't have a father?
immaculate conception?
13 posted on
03/08/2013 8:04:52 PM PST by
oldbrowser
(They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
To: haffast
I wonder what Mr. Albert Perry looked like?
18 posted on
03/08/2013 8:19:30 PM PST by
PLMerite
(Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
To: haffast
Wait a minute! There's something wrong here - they've lost a couple of millions of years. We've heard it repeatedly until now - 'man has been on the earth for millions of years'. Now they want to roll it back to only 340K?
They never cease to amaze, these 'scientists.'
Truth is, man has only been on this earth for a little over 4000 years - per a book called the Bible.
31 posted on
03/08/2013 10:06:28 PM PST by
Ron C.
To: haffast
“Father of all humankind is 340,000 years old”
So who is he, Connor MacLeod? Suppose they mean he lived 340,000 years ago, not that he’s that old?
34 posted on
03/08/2013 10:29:52 PM PST by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: haffast
Good to see the earliest date for humanity being pushed back even further. Previously it was 250K, now 340K.
Just imagine all the civilizations that could have arisen, fallen, and all remains disappeared it that time frame (our current civilization is at best only 6K old, although Hindu literature would put that date back an additional 16K).
If each civilization lasted just 10K and it took an additional 10K for all remains to subsume to Nature, then dividing by 20 we get something like 17 prior civilizations. No need for Aliens to explain the oddities and anomalies found in various places.
38 posted on
03/09/2013 5:36:22 AM PST by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: haffast
New headline: Missing Link Discovered in South Carolina!
43 posted on
03/09/2013 7:38:25 AM PST by
csmusaret
(America is more divided today , not because of the problems we face but because of Obama's solutions)
To: haffast
Father of all humankind is 340,000 years old Oh, man! And I forgot to get him a card this year...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson