Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denied employment BECAUSE I SMOKE
Me

Posted on 02/22/2013 8:25:37 PM PST by FreedomStar3028

So I go in for an interview, everything is going good. It was for an IT help desk in an office. The interviewer asks me a lot of questions, and asks do you smoke? I said yes. She immediately says, I can't give you the job then.

This is in Oregon. I looked up laws and there is a statute where companies cannot use smoking as a consideration when hiring, they can only ban smoking at work. Any advice would be great. Thanks!

Ooops, almost forgot. Long time Lurker, looking to meet some new FRiends.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: entitlement; smokingiscool; sniff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: FreedomStar3028

I’m the one who interviewed you and you are lying. Your smoking wasn’t the reason the interview ended. It was that “I heart Obama” tattoo on your chest that did the trick.


41 posted on 02/22/2013 9:36:54 PM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Can you imagine if a young woman interviewed and was asked if she had children or planned on getting pregnant and had been told, "I'm sorry, we can't hire you then."???

Fecal matter, meet rotating blades.

42 posted on 02/22/2013 9:37:25 PM PST by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

lie, lie, lie


43 posted on 02/22/2013 9:41:33 PM PST by satan (sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028


Coffee and cigarettes were essential to the founding of the art of programming.
44 posted on 02/22/2013 9:43:39 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

or someone being told we won’t hire you because you’re black...?!?

or you look too old?

again, i say you can hire who you want, just don’t be a blatant moron about it. otherwise you deserve what you get. maybe that’s how someone learns not to be a moron anymore. sometimes some people can’t figure it out without a brick to the head, not everyone’s a soft touch.


45 posted on 02/22/2013 9:47:36 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Just wait until the pot heads find out that companies are still going to enforce the drug test policies, whether marijuana is legalized or not. One beer at lunch and you’re gone, one toke the night before, and you’re gone. There is no difference.

Marijuana is said to be 9 times as carcinogenic as tobacco, with the adde effects of increased ADD, short term memory loss and paranoia. I don’t think that tobacco is nearly as bad. Companies have the right to set their own drug and health policies.


46 posted on 02/22/2013 9:48:28 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

all i know is that guy’s right hand holds something other than a cigarette when he’s in front of a keyboard....


47 posted on 02/22/2013 9:49:07 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: berdie

They might not lose days, but I have seen offices where folks huddle around the trash can outside the back door for five or ten minutes every hour and a half.

I wouldn’t ask the question though. It is rare enough these days that you could smell it on the clothes.


48 posted on 02/22/2013 9:50:41 PM PST by Vermont Lt (Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

Unless you believe smokers should be protected by Americans With Disabilities Act, an employer can deny you a job for being a smoker.


49 posted on 02/22/2013 9:52:27 PM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028; xzins

In a perfect libertarian world a company should have the right to hire or fire anyone they want for any reason they want. They should also have the right to choose their customers and to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

We have become so used to the government dictating who we can hire and who we can fire and who we can sell to and who we can buy from that we have lost all of our sense of Liberty.

You should applaud the company for having principles and refusing to hire you because they don’t like your looks, the color of your shirt or the smell you emit when you walk into a room of non-smokers.

Instead you apparently are looking for advice on how you can sue them for discrimination.

As an attorney I would advise you to look for work elsewhere.

As a liberty loving conservative I would advise you to send a letter to the company thanking them for having principles even though those principles conflict with your chosen lifestyle. Then tell them that if you are someday able to kick the smoking habit, that you would consider it an honor to come to work for them.


50 posted on 02/22/2013 9:52:53 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028
Is smoking one of those line items in the obamacare computer database?


51 posted on 02/22/2013 9:58:29 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

Welcome to FR. I am sorry to hear what happened to you.

If they broke the law go after them.  These health Nazis should not be tolerated.

Lesson learned: they don’t deserve the truth.  Libtards can’t handle it anyway.

Do not smoke hours before any interview, so they can’t smell it on you.

If you can’t quit smoking cold turkey, then try nicotine patch or e-cigarette.  E-cigs will give you the nicotine intake, will not smell, and with time you can lower the nicotine dose until you will be able to quit.

An excellent forum with a lot of good, helpful people about e-cigarettes, and how to go about it is here:

http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/

Good luck.

 Note: I am not affiliated with the e-cig forum.

52 posted on 02/22/2013 10:01:17 PM PST by OneHun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

lol. You meant to post that to the other guy


53 posted on 02/22/2013 10:01:46 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
It is probably because you are a higher statistical cost liability, both in benefit cost as well as potential lost time for health reasons.

As a current employer, I hire smokers, but vastly prefer non-smokers. The jobs I currently have are outdoor construction jobs, and in that environment, smokers perform about 80% as much work per hour as non-smokers, simply due to the time spent smoking. A non-smoker will always out-perform a smoker. In addition, smokers tire more easily and can not perform manual labor for nearly the length of time non-smokers can.

And, I have never had to tell a non-smoker to police his butts. Some smokers will willingly comply with this request, some will bad-mouth me behind my back, and some have actually physically confronted me on this issue. If I can avoid this in the hiring interview, it is best handled there--smokers can go work somewhere else.

I previous worked in management in an indoor office setting, similar to your IT position. In that environment, smokers only perform 60-70% of the work non-smokers can. In an indoor environment smokers walk to the nearest entrance, socializing with their peers all the way, smoke outdoors, socialize for a few more minutes, and then walk back to their work area. I have timed this for smokers and it takes approximately 20 minutes per hour.

The company recognized this time drag and instituted a policy of not hiring smokers. They did not fire existing employees, but are slowly eliminating smokers by attrition.

I know this is not going to be a popular set of facts with smokers, but they are the facts.

Another issue is that smokers literally stink to non-smokers. A fact that few smokers are willing to recognize. You don't have to be actively smoking to smell bad, the smoke permeates your clothes and hair so that any non-smoker can always identify a smoker from 5-10 feet away, just by smell. Why hire a newcomer who has the potential to create dissention among existing employees?

Health concerns are lower down my list, but are still a valid issue.

You need to get used to the fact that the days of "smokers' rights" are long gone, and you have a habit which puts you squarely in the lower class and makes many question your intellectual capabilities.

My advice is to quit. You will have much better employment possibilities, and will have higher advancement potential.

54 posted on 02/22/2013 10:10:22 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

That may/may not be true re: wasted time outside to smoke.

I have seen a trend of late, sadly, that there is a lot of wasted time in the work place. Be it phone calls, talking, texting or surfing the internet. I read an article recently that said if Facebook wasn’t allowed on the job, folks wouldn’t take the job. Go figure.


55 posted on 02/22/2013 10:14:28 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Your post generalizes quite a bit, but I won't argue with your experience.

I will say that the cauldron of different perfumes and after shave that usually exists in an office environment is equally disgusting as those stinky smokers.

Saying that smokers are in a “low class” and intellectually deficient is certainly an overstatement.

56 posted on 02/22/2013 10:28:25 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: OneHun; FreedomStar3028
If they broke the law go after them.

If they broke the law, then the law is an ass.

57 posted on 02/22/2013 10:28:25 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OneHun; FreedomStar3028
If they broke the law go after them.

If they broke the law, then the law is an ass.

58 posted on 02/22/2013 10:28:40 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Just have to ask, are you a feminist?


59 posted on 02/22/2013 10:28:49 PM PST by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028; 50mm; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952; Old Sarge; TheOldLady; Darksheare
Gee ... you said you want to meet new friends.

You've got over 50 replies and nary a word.

In fact, this post is your only post, ever.

Maybe it's just the smoke, but ...


60 posted on 02/22/2013 10:35:38 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson