Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: GOP must ‘evolve and adapt’
Politico ^ | MACKENZIE WEINGER

Posted on 01/20/2013 2:01:28 PM PST by JohnPDuncan

Sen. Rand Paul said on Sunday that he will make a decision on a 2016 presidential run within two years and plans to be a force in the refashioning the Republican party regardless of whether he seeks the Oval Office.

“We will continue to pursue and, you know, try to make that decision over the next two years or so,” the Kentucky Republican told WABC Radio’s Aaron Klein when asked about a potential White House bid.

In the meantime, Paul said, he will “try to be part of the national debate” and added that he hopes to play a major role in directing the future of the Republican Party.

Paul added that there are major areas of concern for the party, noting “we are not popular and we have not been competitive out in California, on the West Coast, or in New England.”

And his particular brand of conservatism could play well in those regions and with other voters who may not currently identify with the Republican Party, Paul said.

“So we think a little more of a libertarian Republican, someone who is a strict Constitutionalist, but also believes in a strong, defensive military but not necessarily in an overly aggressive or bellicose lets get involved in everybody’s civil war military, I think that has more appeal to independents and some people who have given up in the Republican Party,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016; gop; kentucky; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last
To: Las Vegas Ron

Hi Ron, Thanks ;)

To me it’s much of a muchness. (Scuze me while I whip this out...

Example:
“WE” elect people. WE spent decades compromising and sending candidates to DC who are less than principled.

So by what right do we the electorate claim to be midffed when they do what decades of history PROVE we sent them there to do? Compromise everything.

On this very thread there are people advocating the GOP comp on social issues to ‘win’. Sometimes the disconnect is stunning. What do they win? They ‘win’ more compromise.

That is a historically documented fact. So where am I going with this? Simple.

If we want people to do X, then it stands to reason we have to want X. And when you have people straying as far off the raZ as they are and claiming the position to be conservative, I do not see how coexistence is possible.

We have to be unified. I totally agree. But the concept of what is and is not conservative isn’t some nebulous thing. It’s very simple. But people are determined to redefine it and bend it to their wants.

I do not see how we can compromise with people wanting the polar opposite of ‘conservative’ and still with a straight face call ourselves such. As Ronaldus Magnus said, a party can’t be all things to all people. Neither can a political philosophy.


101 posted on 01/20/2013 5:14:38 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Hmmm, asking qustions for clear and concise facts is now advancing conspiray theories eh?

Lot's of un answered questions on this case as far as I am concerned....and it doesn't help when you have to question the veracity of every new "fact" that gets released. I don't trust them as far as I can spit.

This is your proof????

More....

The bottom line is that is all we have here, is what the media says so we're left to pick and choose exactly what to believe. At this point, it's all hearsay, most of which is conflicting, and no hard evidence.

Do you also belive obama when he say unemplyment is low and we're in a recovery?

Please explain how asking for clear and truthful facts are PROMOTING a conspiracy.

So if I don't swallow everthing dear leader feeds me, I'm a nut.

Holdren, is that you?

102 posted on 01/20/2013 5:19:00 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Let me guess, dope supporter, gay marriage supporter, abortion supporter.

You must not have been around here for very long to post that tripe. If you have, you don't read well.

103 posted on 01/20/2013 5:19:00 PM PST by BfloGuy (Workers and consumers are, of course, identical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

“There will probably not be a presidential run in 2016. King Obama will probably be America’s first dictator by then. Don’t see anything stopping him now, including the GOP. Wake up America.”

My sentiments exactly.


104 posted on 01/20/2013 5:29:34 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Knock if off dude. You're not fooling anyone. Anyone can read those threads and see what you're up to.

The bottom line is that is all we have here, is what the media says so we're left to pick and choose exactly what to believe. At this point, it's all hearsay, most of which is conflicting, and no hard evidence.

This is just not true. It's BS. What you are saying here is absolute nonsense. You are not stuck trying to pick and chose what to believe. You are not left relying on only media reports. There are police reports, coroner reports, etc. Initial media coverage is always sketchy, but the facts become pretty clear over time. We know who the shooter is, we know what weapons he used, we know how many people he killed, etc.

Please explain how asking for clear and truthful facts are PROMOTING a conspiracy.

The facts are already out there. There is no confusion here. We know what happened in Sandy Hook. What are you having trouble understanding? You're questioning of the "official" story is no different than 9-11 truthers doing the same. And when called on it, the typical 9-11 truther replies the same as you do.

105 posted on 01/20/2013 5:32:28 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
Agreed. I’m pro-life too, but even if we did have a Human Life Amendment, the Feds would screw it up just like everything else. Get aggressively anti-abortion laws passed at the states. It’s the only thing that works.

I do see your point. I tend to be more libertarian in my views although I am conservative socially on a personal level, I just think that government getting involved in many things like these screw it up royally. I guess I'd be a "Barry Goldwater type," minus Planned Parenthood, in short, the latter must sink or swim on it's own, they deserve no government funds at all.

I think as well where in many pockets, I know I'll get flak for this, but it isn't 1955 or even 1980 anymore. I'm afraid running on social issues is weak at best and a loser at worst, we need to focus more on "government out of your life" and fiscal issues. Yes, it would be cool to have a presidential candidate who is socially conservative, I lean that way myself but we must remember, we are electing a President, not the Pope, not to be a national Ward Cleaver or the Nanny. Leave these matters like same sex marriage to the State and so on. We must realise that we might not always get what we want on a State by State basis but that is the way our system is set up.
106 posted on 01/20/2013 5:32:42 PM PST by Nowhere Man (Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Your post is long and thoughtful, and it is worthy of discussion more than can be accomplished here, but this strikes me so I'll comment on this part:
So by what right do we the electorate claim to be midffed when they do what decades of history PROVE we sent them there to do? Compromise everything.

I believe it was Ayn Rand who said the existence of the Republican party was only to slow the inevitable slide to the left...she was wholly correct in that view.

World history has shown that man has been slave to Government or men in power, this Country, once an exception, is merely sliding back to what has been normal.

People like you and I will not go peacefully, we will die free men.

May God Bless us all.

107 posted on 01/20/2013 5:43:53 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Knock if off dude. You're not fooling anyone. Anyone can read those threads and see what you're up to.

Screw your self, I do hope FReepers here do take the time to read my history....I'll be waiting.

108 posted on 01/20/2013 5:49:16 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
the typical 9-11 truther replies the same as you do

Couldn't resist tossing in some Alinsky, could ya!

109 posted on 01/20/2013 5:52:29 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

“we will die free men.”

In the end, that’s the best we can hope for.


110 posted on 01/20/2013 5:53:18 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Your original statement is good. Our major problem is that conservatism for many is whatever they want it to mean. Until we are of like mind, we are not going anywhere.

I would encourage you to study the ten principles of conservatism.

http://www.kirkcenter.org/index.php/detail/ten-conservative-principles/ It does require a thinking cap...................

111 posted on 01/20/2013 5:59:01 PM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Lord save me from some conservatives, they don't understand human nature any better than liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

So you don’t care that California would be issuing gay spousal visas for the US? I do. It’s a huge issue and its one of the reasons why this issue cannot be left to the states.


112 posted on 01/20/2013 6:06:57 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

“You must not have been around here for very long to post that tripe. If you have, you don’t read well.”

And still batting 1.000.


113 posted on 01/20/2013 6:08:12 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

“I’m afraid running on social issues is weak at best and a loser at worst”

Hello Mitt Romney! Glad to have you on Free Republic!


114 posted on 01/20/2013 6:09:14 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

““I’m afraid running on social issues is weak at best and a loser at worst””

I want anyone on this thread to explain to me two things.

1: How that is reconcilable with ‘conservatism”
2: How implementation of it is not closer to leftism than conservative thought.

It is the very essence of why we are fractured. It is 50 shades of wrong.


115 posted on 01/20/2013 6:22:03 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

A good read for us all indeed.


116 posted on 01/20/2013 6:24:02 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I don’t either. And this is the problem. We’ve got too many ‘conservatives’, who simply aren’t so.


117 posted on 01/20/2013 6:24:17 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Haha! Good luck with that buddy. In case you havent noticed, the country just re-elected a Marxist President, so I’m actually glad it’s a state issue so he can’t impose California Marxism on everyone.


118 posted on 01/20/2013 6:24:48 PM PST by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

*sigh*

100 percent clueless. No, it’s not a state issue. It’s a federal issue.


119 posted on 01/20/2013 6:30:42 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
I don’t either. And this is the problem. We’ve got too many ‘conservatives’, who simply aren’t so.

And you're a n00b who is here to define what a Conservative is?

What is YOUR definition?

120 posted on 01/20/2013 6:32:22 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson