Posted on 01/19/2013 8:14:50 PM PST by PieterCasparzen
If you've done some serious reading on 20th century activities of the "international banking elite", and reviewed the patterns of the last century, you would see the world's most powerful international banking new world order types way too close to the goal line for your personal comfort.
The officer corps of the U.S. military is a key piece of the puzzle. At the beginning of the U.S. Civil War, the U.S. military basically divided itself into two sides and fought itself. The question then was on succession. In the future the question to the service members would be on federation: Will you swear a new oath of allegiance that is not solely to the U.S. Constitution, but to an international body of which the U.S. is a member ? The Navy is already being forced to repeat the mantra that they are "a global force for good". Depending on the military's center of gravity, we would either see the U.S. becoming part of a larger union, or a showdown of some kind. Flag officers winding up retiring to the Council on Foreign Relations and continual propagandizing at the Service Academies, IMHO, signifies a strategy to keep slowly chipping away until the military is amenable to oath changes, which assures the new world order transition with only minor annoyance for resistance.
All news networks are ceaselessly pounding out propaganda on gun control, like a bird dog flushing out it's prey. Surely somewhere analysts are judging the public's reaction to this constant pinging.
The purebred globalist Richard Fisher, lieutentant at the Dallas Fed, coyly used the "Texan" angle to play the Fed's "conservative" "rebel" in a burst of pings this week designed to sow the seeds of setting up for a segmented collapse. Statism's local monopoly banks in the U.S. could then essentially survive a meltdown, along with the Fed, enabling their continued use as loan sharks to the nation as a whole. The last century surely has taught us that statists have perfected the meltdown just has much as they have mastered civil unrest and casus belli.
It's good to be the King, but it's better to be the lender of last resort to the King who is in debt up to his eyeballs.
“The current military is being indoctrinated and purged”
No question about that at all. I am talking about millions of defense contractor personnel required to keep it all flowing. How many of them would continue to do so if they thought the military was being used against them? Very few.
I know I’d quit in that situation. This is part of why I think we have hope. But I hate thinking to myself “it could never happen” then just ignore the problem. IMHO, we urgently need to stop this century long statist spiral at it’s root, because the one world government idea is marching forward.
You might be legit. But you need to pay your dues or get someone to back you who has.
Yes and no.
Iraq. Afghanistan. The Soviet Experience, and ours.
Packing up a few MREs and heading for the hills will be useless in defeating what will be a statist takeover of the U.S. from the inside of the government.
Those who go into the forests are dead meat. The best camoflauge in America is not pixelated forest green. The best camoflauge in America is blue jeans, a t shirt, and Nikes.
Very important questions, thank you for asking.
I’ve chosen to not publish my info publicly on FR to avoid annoyance.
But those who respond to my invitations via FReepmail, I consider them part of think tank exploratory group. I have shared my info with those people and I have asked them for their info. I didn’t know who are, they don’t know who I am. We will exchange info, talk, ask for references, etc., until we are satisfied. Ask to talk to the references - you can talk to mine. I have zero to hide.
I’m telling participants who I am - answering any questions they have. Which so far has been none (I guess my resume was enough, they see that I’m just some geek dude). I’m asking them who they are. (We’re gonna have a secret meeting soon. Shhhh. Hilary’s vast right wing conspiracy. Ooooooo).
Those who respond and ask about participating (for real) will all want to know who each other are, that they are who they say they are. Then they can make an informed decision about whether they want to join the Think Tank and in what capacity.
Trouble is today TV and the Internet have replaced reality for many people. In short, they don’t want to take the tiniest risk, and they don’t want to put out any effort; stuck in a work-to-couch loop.
It’s more than just a ping list on FR at this point.
It is moving into becoming it’s own organization, like the Boy Scouts or the Chamber of Commerce. It will have meetings, phone calls, emails, etc., and plans will be formed and executed.
It will be separate and distinct from every other conservative organization, website, etc. It’s brand new. It has no backers yet. None. The whole plan is to specifically not have big major backers; to not be a front organization. No CIA, no Koch brothers, no Birchers, no Nazis, no secret left-wing backers, etc. The idea is to be a “front” organization, as it were, for small business owners who also see the Bible as their rule and guide for life. It’s not a Church, though - it’s a business.
Once marketing begins, other people will join. The exact same issue arises: who are these new people really, and they will want to know who the current members are really.
Everybody wants to know who they are dealing with.
If you FReepmail me, I’ll send you my info and I’ll look forward to you grilling me like a tuna.
[there Mr. Soros, how was that ? Ok ? Oh, is this thing still on ?]
bleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep /SARC
I guess you fail to consider it's a lot of our kids who are manning them tanks and planes.
Noted.
I’m new here...what exactly is a bankster?
“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace.
We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”
- Samuel Adams
There’s a trail over the last century of folks who fit into this bizzarre set of categories, forming a club of sorts:
Serve on Boards and Foundations associated with American and European largest banks and a few large companies associated with them through common directors
Related banks are the lenders to central banks
Sit on boards of Central Banks and were founders of central banks
Sit on boards of news media in the U.S.
Ivy League: schools, endowments, Board directors, and, of course, they attend those schools exclusively
Various think tanks
The Council on Foreign Relations (founded by J P Morgan)
Behind the founding of the League of Nations and the United Nations
The U.S. government, mainly the White House, State Dept and Treasury
There are a few more organizations...
But this should be enough to think it strange that there are common ties going back a century between these.
And U.S. foreign policy and the news media have all been going in the direction that the leaders of this network desire during that time.
The network has a history of investing in totalitarian states.
The network of directors of these organizations are the representatives of the institutions that are the creditors of all nations that have debt.
Every time there is a war, the nations have to borrow more to prosecute the war, and to reconstruct afterwards. Which is more government borrowing for which they need the services of this network.
Much of the organizations is “hidden in plain sight” (no one thinks about it and it’s never reported on), while particulare negotiations, conversations, transactions, etc., are not public.
Thank you, but I’m nowhere closer to understanding what a bankster is.
In the model you’ve described, who are the heavy hitters - and why? (i.e. command/control elements)?
No idea. Why don't you email the washingtontimes and ask?
Gee. What you can find out with a couple clicks on a mouse....
At the time of the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, West Point's counterterrorism curriculum consisted of a single elective class. In order to fill this gap and provide greater educational resources in terrorism-related issues, the Academy welcomed the creation of the Combating Terrorism Center and included it in its Department of Social Sciences on February 20, 2003. Though thus a part of the United States Military Academy, the CTC was established with private funding and is an independent research group. Primary funding for the founding of the CTC was contributed by Vincent Viola, a 1977 graduate of the United States Military Academy and former chairman of the New York Mercantile Exchange; significant initial support was also provided by Ross Perot, George Gilmore Jr. and Major (ret.) George Gilmore Sr. The Center's first Distinguished Chair was General (Retired) Wayne Downing until his death in 2007. General (Retired) John P. Abizaid, the former commander of Central Command, presently holds the Distinguished Chair. The current director, Major Bryan C. Price, began his tenure in August 2012.
Sorry CT, but I have worked in Iraq, A-stan, and the southern Philippines for major US contractors. Those people would do the same as the Iraqi's and Afghani's that worked for the US military machine. The dollar talks.
=Dr. Arie Perliger
Class of 1977 Director of Terrorism Studies
Curriculum Vitae EXPERT BIO –Special thanks to the West Point Class of 1977 for generously supporting this position-
Arie Perliger is the Director of Terrorism Studies at the Combating Terrorism Center and Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Sciences, US Military Academy at West Point. After completing his PhD in Political Science at the University of Haifa Israel (2007), where he was also a fellow at the National Security Studies Center (NSSC), Dr. Perliger became affiliated with the Department of Political Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem as a Golda Meir Post-Doctoral Fellow (2007-2008). On August 2008 Dr. Perliger joined the Department of Political Science at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, where he was a Schusterman Visiting Assistant Professor until the summer of 2010.
In the past decade Dr. Perliger has studied extensively issues related to Terrorism and Political Violence, Politics of Security, Politics of the Far Right in Israel, Europe and the US, Middle Eastern Politics and the applicability of Social Network Analysis to the study of social phenomena. His studies appeared in four books and more than 20 articles and book chapters by publishers such as Columbia University Press, Rutledge, Security Studies, Social Forces and others.
Dr. Perliger is the co-editor of the journal Democracy and Security and a regular reviewer for various publishers and Journals such as Political Psychology, Critical Studies on Terrorism, Terrorism and Political Violence, Columbia University Press, Chicago University Press, Routledge and Polity Press.
Also see
Identifying Three Trends in Far Right Violence in the United States
Hmm, have you seen this?
(Btw, sorry for all the typos in my freepmail! Sheesh, I need to preview.)
Got it, thanks.
Thanks for the info, Sarajevo. I always do my own research but was off to work not long after I posted. Dr. Arie Perliger. Interesting.
Damn straight. They’re deaf, dumb, and blind without us. They ain’t goin’ nowhere, ain’t movin’ nothin’ unless we make it so.
That many people can’t keep a secret. So when we get wind of intended movement, down go the databases, software, and servers. We’ll send their @sses back to the stone age with a few passes across the keyboard.
I’m happy to meet them on the field of battle in the stone age. I can win there too.
“The dollar talks”
Death talks louder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.