Posted on 01/19/2013 8:14:50 PM PST by PieterCasparzen
If you've done some serious reading on 20th century activities of the "international banking elite", and reviewed the patterns of the last century, you would see the world's most powerful international banking new world order types way too close to the goal line for your personal comfort.
The officer corps of the U.S. military is a key piece of the puzzle. At the beginning of the U.S. Civil War, the U.S. military basically divided itself into two sides and fought itself. The question then was on succession. In the future the question to the service members would be on federation: Will you swear a new oath of allegiance that is not solely to the U.S. Constitution, but to an international body of which the U.S. is a member ? The Navy is already being forced to repeat the mantra that they are "a global force for good". Depending on the military's center of gravity, we would either see the U.S. becoming part of a larger union, or a showdown of some kind. Flag officers winding up retiring to the Council on Foreign Relations and continual propagandizing at the Service Academies, IMHO, signifies a strategy to keep slowly chipping away until the military is amenable to oath changes, which assures the new world order transition with only minor annoyance for resistance.
All news networks are ceaselessly pounding out propaganda on gun control, like a bird dog flushing out it's prey. Surely somewhere analysts are judging the public's reaction to this constant pinging.
The purebred globalist Richard Fisher, lieutentant at the Dallas Fed, coyly used the "Texan" angle to play the Fed's "conservative" "rebel" in a burst of pings this week designed to sow the seeds of setting up for a segmented collapse. Statism's local monopoly banks in the U.S. could then essentially survive a meltdown, along with the Fed, enabling their continued use as loan sharks to the nation as a whole. The last century surely has taught us that statists have perfected the meltdown just has much as they have mastered civil unrest and casus belli.
It's good to be the King, but it's better to be the lender of last resort to the King who is in debt up to his eyeballs.
Thanks for the post/link to Think Tank Threads. Looking forward to tomorrow after work read, Pieter.
Yes, you can get enough of the idea just from the title.
The military is being propagandized that the “far right” is their enemy.
They are being taught that it is acceptable for the military to attack these people, that they are enemies of the U.S. government and the people.
Did you know that the press in the U.S. was brought under control of international bankers about a century ago ? “Media bias” did not just spontaneously happen. Media control allows international banking to win most elections and prevent “rogue” candidates that work for them from getting elected. Most people active as Democrats or Republicans have no idea that they are doing the bidding of globalists. Most Democrats do because their party openly supports collectivism and statism. The highest levels of the Republican establishment - they certainly know who they are working for.
No other nations will be there to fight for the idea of separate nations; America is the one last remaining blockage to one world government.
Treason for the last century.
Civil resistance in America will be crushed like a bug by the U.S. military.
A few AR-15s are no match for M1A1 tanks and F-16s, civil resistance will be little more than an annoyance.
Packing up a few MREs and heading for the hills will be useless in defeating what will be a statist takeover of the U.S. from the inside of the government.
That is why the key question is - how many of the U.S. military will support globalism and how many will support the American people and it’s legitimate government, which has been smeared for a century by the press as the “radical right” ?
“Civil resistance in America will be crushed like a bug by the U.S. military.”
You mean just like in Afghanistan?
A few AR-15s are no match for M1A1 tanks and F-16s, civil resistance will be little more than an annoyance.
They have to come out sometime. Tanks are for killing other tanks not chasing infantry and F16s are blind without someone on the ground observing. They have to be fed, have supplies delivered, have things manufactured for them. They also have families to care for.
I'm not sure the Knights Templar would agree with you on that assertion.
I have to disagree with you there. We are not the blockage to one world government, but with our constant interference in foreign affairs, we are leading the charge for a one world government.
LOL - right, I got too carried away and forgot to make myself clear.
When I say American I mean the last vestiges of national sovereignty America has, the last few tens of millions of Americans who bristle at the thought of statism, that pesky Constitution, etc.
It’s not those “real Americans” leading the charge for one world government. But then again, those “real Americans” aren’t in charge. It’s the elites that operate behind the scenes and use the American government like a puppetmaster that have been making America cause all that “interference” as you so wonderfully put it.
Many people are not aware of this: the Council on Foreign Relations was founded by J P Morgan.
Helllllooooooo.
The CFR virtually IS the U.S. State Department. CFR men have been THE Presidential foreign policy advisors since the founding of CFR. The League of Nations was a creation of CFR. Wilson was elected through the invaluable efforts of the CFR and sold his soul to them and did their bidding. He was a nobody until the banksters propped him up.
Name a war in the 20th century, it’s backed financially on all sides by the banking elites.
Our Democrat and Republican “politics” is our own little sideshow which is just an illusion that the citizens are able to elect “their own” leaders. Trouble is, very few of either party on not working for the banksters one world government plans (whether they know it or not). So if the banksters control who is nominated on both tickets - whether you vote Dem or Repub - you still get a bankster man in office ! I don’t call that the “people electing their own leaders”, but I’m funny that way.
Perhaps one world government may get America’s “brandname” attached to it, but personally I like to draw that “fine line” distinction between a “nation” interfering with other nations versus a tryannical government that illegitimately took over a nation interfering with other nations.
HOORAY Republican congressional staffer!
Who was that staffer? More importantly...who is in that West Point "think tank"?
Thread/ThinkTank BUMP! Tank vs. tank ALERT
Perliger's article at West Point is just another so called "study," in the continuous drum beat to gin up hate against Americans who believe in the Constitution. These and other articles in the state controlled media will be used to influence public opinion to disarm law abiding Americans.
Since this "study," is directed at the officer corp, 0bama will more than likely have most of the military follow his orders when the time comes. Oh, make no mistake about it, the time will come.
5.56mm
Many of America's problems can be alleviated (not solved, alas) if liberty-minded focus hard on local issues and representatives and stop worrying so much about the Clown College in DC. It's the height of folly, for example, to get upset over the nightly Fox News broadcast about Obama's latest outrage when your local school board is filled with Leftists and you stayed home to watch TV and didn't bother to go to the meeting. :)
“A few AR-15s “
Being a little dsimissive there, sweetheart? “A few”? You mean about 60,000,000?
The banking elite is fast moving America to give up it’s sovereignty. That will be a worldwide nightmare, the worst in history by far.
It’s happening now.
When it happens, your job won’t matter, local politics won’t matter.
What was it like in every communist revolution - what was it like living in the communist state that came out of it ?
Nightmare.
I don’t think people cared much about the stinking local school board at that point. Especially considering if they complained too much and annoyed the wrong local leader they wound up in the Gulag Archipelago.
Forgive me for not approaching organizing with the goal of fighting partisan battles, but the banksters own both sides, left and right. And guess what - the banksters ARE the left. Ford built a plant in Russia in the 1930s. Wilson refused to be against the Bolsheviks. Wilson gave Trotsky a passport to get him from the U.S. to Russia to attend the revolution. A Director of the Federal Reserve traveled with other Wall Streeters to Russia to set up funding for the Bolsheviks. The list of evidence goes on and on throughout the 20th century. Practically everything I was taught about the 20th century was bogus (mostly what was left out).
It’s morning, time for me to wake up and smell the coffee.
If you’d like to do local organizing please FReepmail me. I’m calling ALL patriots. It’s not crazy, this is real as a heart attack, it’s time to get going.
I don’t believe it is impossible. In fact, I’ve been planning for several years. At least a hundred million people would be on the side of what’s right if they knew how they’ve been lied to. That’s the only thing keeping America sovereign right now, those pesky people who don’t want to give up their nation. But those hundred million need to get up off the couch, as you say and put the remote down.
Everyone is welcome to introduce themselves and offer to help.
“The government forces would have control of “
That’s your first bad assumption that leads to the rest of an illogical conclusion. At most there might be 4 million federal troops, at most. Hell, there are only about 150,000 troops under arms in the first place. You really think 50,000,000+ million Americans will let them have control of anything?? Those F-16’s, M-1 tanks, Bradley vehicles, and the like need massive maintenance, fuel, part, supplies, and just whose families do you think will have their asses swinging in the wind while their service members do the bad deeds? You think they’ll be safe? Do you really think 100% of the military would even go along with such orders as to attack us?
We built those systems, the tanks, the airplanes, the satellites, the communications systems, and the weapon systems. We run them, design them, operate and maintain them. Without all that the fed is deaf, dumb, and blind. The military isn’t run by the military. It is run by the civilians that create and maintain it. An F-16 can fly about twice before it needs more maintenance. An M-1 tank goes but a few miles before it needs fuel. Soldiers cannot live past a week without food.
Sorry, but you give credit to the military as though it is some kind of beast with magical powers never needing food, water, or parts and is some kind of monster none of us know anything about. The military system is extremely fragile in that is needs constant care and feeding.
With the military being the group that holds the hammer, should we not be looking at ways to influence service members? I have considered making flyers and going to hangouts, parking lots and other venues near the military base closest to me.
Maybe we should be discussing ways to communicate the importance of their oath and give them the tools to share their knowledge with other service members. The left has given us some pretty effective models, i.e. community organizers, Alinsky methods, and such. Maybe start getting Alinsky style personal with the left leaning Officers who are implementing the administrations diktats.
I, and many Freepers and Tea Party types are veterans and we have connections on bases. I believe it is past time we go on the offensive in the propaganda war.
The current military is being indoctrinated and purged. Disobeying orders is a big deal. That is what the plan turns on: how many side with the government-turned-globalist, versus how many actually rebel against it. Very importantly, which specific personnel. Obviously the government would place Generals and officers in command of every fort / installation that were loyal, and dismiss and bring up on charges those who tried to turn over the fort to the rebels. If enough of the leadership of a fort went rebel, that would be a rebellion/treason/standoff situation. So the big question in Civil War is, which installations go rebel and which stay globalist.
Those civilians who maintain the equipment work for defense contractors. Those companies and people that work for them will keep doing the work in order to get paid. Depending on how much “resistance” they offered they could be fired or brought up on charges. Those who go along would be able to keep living as they are now, buy food and paying the mortgage, getting new cars and going on vacation. Men face a difficult proposition in risking their homes/wives/children.
As far as the government forces needing supply, yes, but so do the rebels. And that’s what I’m saying, IMHO, the government forces would have a decided advantage in supply except in one case: where the majority of the active military - especially the officer corp - goes against the government-turned-globalist and side with the rebels.
IMHO, what the populace says will have a very big effect on what the military thinks, if what the populace says is dramatic enough. Perhaps along the lines of what you said, where part of the public outcry is a massive walkout on defense contractors ?
Ergo, we see the bankster propaganda machine focusing on public opinion and the officer corps.
Also, beware the banksters turning on their own guy. They install another of their guys as head of the rebels (he brings funding and support they give him). After the revolution he slips into power - this is their specialty. The people will think they have succeeded but the banksters will continue “advising” (controlling) the government, hidden in plain sight via the CFR or a successor front organization.
It’s a danged difficult puzzle. If there is an actual Civil War, the government borrows even more from the banksters. Also, remember the worldwide press/propaganda is globalist and so is the bankster community; the government could borrow a trillion in a snap. The military could be greatly enlarged. Could implement a draft and jail those who refuse. Government would order Governors to use all their police - so which States would comply and how defensible are the resisting States ? If the military had a loyal base inside the resisting State, the State find it very difficult to not capitulate. Ft. Hood pretty much determines which way Texas can go, etc., Ft Dix/McGuire Determines NY/NJ/PA/northeast - globalist ?, etc.
IMHO, best to work directly right now on raising awareness, gaining influence, bolstering small business (and some more peaceful strategies), and ripping open the bankster can of worms out in public for all to see. There are ways out of this but we need some “community organizing”, not just blogging.
Yes, without a doubt. People should FReepmail me regarding the Think Tank to find out how they can get involved.
People definitely need to post informative, thoughful threads on FR to raise awareness.
And promote their threads on the internet so people surfing around find them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.