Black enough ....
Go figure.
Once in a while...Pitt’s swerves into some truth.
Wow! Good post.
Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican. I guess this means he wasn’t black, either.
Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican. I guess this means he wasn’t black, either.
Dr. Martin Luther King was a Republican. I guess this means he wasn’t black, either.
Shocker coming from this guy.
“Phone call for Mr. Pitts, Justice Clarence Thomas on line 2.”
What I find interesting is that many of the most zealous “black-identity” race-mongers are the lightest-skinned black people one sees.
I am thinking of people like Jeremiah Wright, Julian Bond (first head of Southern Poverty Law Center), Ben Jealous (head of NAACP) or even media talking-heads like Melissa Perry on MSNBC or Soledad Obrien on CNN
On one hand...he's going after Parker. But then bags on all the Redskin's fans........He just can't control his inner Progressive.
It gets worse. I have no natural rhythm, no criminal record and can correctly pronounce the word “ask.”
Funny...now if a white guy had wrote that...well, nevermind.
“isuddenly find myself concerned about my blackness. it had
never occured to me before.”
LIE!
Colon Powell is sure black enough, He damned sure isn’t Republican enough.
Or maybe he is if we compare him with John McCain.
I tuned the author's post a bit to expose his hypocrisy. Not that it much needed doing.
You can't be black if you are a Republican? That means Colin Powell isn't black.
Colin Powell is definitely black, but he's definitely NOT a Republican. He just calls himself that. If Colin Powell is a Republican, I'm a giraffe.
The explosion you hear Mr. Pitt is Racism moving past the speed of sound.
“He is, after all, a man out of work. It doesn’t get much blacker than that.”
Sometimes the truth rears its ugly head and cannot be denied!
leanard pitts jr is an aqnti-christian bleedign heart liberal of the whiniest order- I didn’t even bother readign hte article because it became apparent when our newspaper picked up his articles, that he was a nasty viscious liberal that was always screamign abotu racism andm aking mountaisn out of molehills- He’s incapable of writign abotu the truth except perhaps by accident, and even though he claims to ‘be Christian’ it’s VERY clear from reading his past articles that he is not a CHristian and hasn’t got even hte slightest knowledge of the bible or the Chrisdtian faith- The only reason he calls himself CHristian is because he mostrl ikely thinks that it gives his outrageous expositions ligitimacy with the ‘Christian’ crowd- he’s sadly msitaken-
If he wasn’t such a viscious hateful person cryign wolf at every turn, I’d read his articles because he does have the potential of beign an itnerestign writer0- but unfortunately his hateful anti-Christianity, and his blatant extremist partisanship spoils any message of worth he may have
Black enough ....
Go figure.
I know Pitt's FR account was banned, but I guess we still allow his stuff on here. No matter really.
What is a matter, is that my wife on several occasions (including at work), has been told she isn't black enough.
Methinks it is because she is a conservative.
Blacks can be very racist to whites, and other black people too. Strange.
5.56mm
Then does Pitts ever wonder that maybe all those white people who vote Republican are not necessarily racist haters and bigots? Maybe they’re concerned about the growth of government and the eradication of a national culture based on Judeo-Christian ethics and morals? Somehow I don’t think so.
So, what exactly qualifies as ‘black enough?’ I’d like some input from fellow Freepers.
Are you black enough only if you consider your race to still be oppressed, and being held down by ‘the man?’ What are some other criteria?