Skip to comments.
Obama's upcoming dishonor of General Norman Schwarzkopf (vanity)
me
| 12/28/12
| me
Posted on 12/28/2012 4:42:03 AM PST by lump in the melting pot
Yesterday we lost a true American giant, Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf. Today, I'm starting a betting pool on how many times obama uses the words "I" "me" or "my" in his eulogy to the General. As was noted in the Weekly Standard, Zero used "I","me" or "my" a total of 63 times in a 1,600-word eulogy to the late Medal of Honor recipient and Senator, Daniel Inouye, to whom he referred as "Danny" in the speech. I will donate $50 to FR in the name of the freeper who posts the closest numeric guess, prior to publication of Dear Reader's failure to properly honor a true American. Bonus: if Il Douche calls the General "Norm", I'll donate $50 to the NRA also. I won't have the stomach to read Obi won Nairobi's telepromptered spew, so any respected news site or blog's word count afterwards will suffice.
Fregards, lump
TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: inouye; schwarzkopf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: lump in the melting pot
71. The patholgy of unchecked narcissism invariably incraeses over time.
21
posted on
12/28/2012 5:28:44 AM PST
by
piytar
(The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
To: Mouton
“I wonder how many times he will get the Generals name wrong”
“I can't say Norman Schwarzkopf, so I will call him General Normal George.” Broncho Bamma
22
posted on
12/28/2012 5:34:14 AM PST
by
Tupelo
(I'm an old man and most people hate me, but I don't like them either so that makes it all even.)
To: lump in the melting pot
Do you really think that he’ll bother to say anything? If he does, I’ll guess 27 because it will be a very short speech.
23
posted on
12/28/2012 5:44:24 AM PST
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: lump in the melting pot
my guess is 40 **************
I wonder if there isn't a fair-to-midline chance that Zero won't be invited a-tall...??
24
posted on
12/28/2012 5:44:57 AM PST
by
Wings-n-Wind
(The main things are the plain things!)
To: Wings-n-Wind
Gen. Schwarzkopf’s family publicly dis-inviting bummer to the funeral would make a great start to 2013. I suspect they are too classy to do something like that, though.
25
posted on
12/28/2012 6:01:49 AM PST
by
lump in the melting pot
(Communism - a social experiment which, for ethical reasons, should not be performed on live humans)
To: ConservaTexan
I’m down for 0 for Zer0 also. Doubt he’ll attend.
26
posted on
12/28/2012 6:16:18 AM PST
by
mykroar
(BAD-ANON: One Game At A Time)
To: lump in the melting pot
Bonus: if Il Douche calls the General "Norm", I'll donate $50 to the NRA also. I'm figuring on him calling the General "Stormin Normie". As to Obama's self-references:
- I : 42
- me: 21
- mine: 12
- my: 7
27
posted on
12/28/2012 6:17:49 AM PST
by
Flick Lives
(We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
To: lump in the melting pot
I can hear Barry already. “We need to pass a tax cut on ‘the rich’ in honor of General Schwarzkopf.” The boy is sick.
28
posted on
12/28/2012 6:23:21 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(U.S. elections have become nothing but another cheap ripoff of American Idol.)
To: lump in the melting pot
my guess is 40So, you only expect him to speak for about 5 minutes?
To: lump in the melting pot
I imagine Obama could pack many I’s and me’s in there as he liked, if they were put in context, such as:
“I know nothing about honor or heroism, like he did.”
30
posted on
12/28/2012 6:41:35 AM PST
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Pennies and Nickels will NO LONGER be Minted as of 1/1/13 - Tim Geithner, US Treasury Sect)
To: lump in the melting pot
I’ll match your $50 donation in the FReeper’s name that comes the closest.
31
posted on
12/28/2012 6:53:28 AM PST
by
upchuck
(America's at an awkward stage. Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards.)
To: lump in the melting pot
Gen. Schwarzkopfs family publicly dis-inviting bummer to the funeral would make a great start to 2013. I suspect they are too classy to do something like that, though. ************
I sm sure they will be classy-- but if Zero "ain't invited" -- it would be without class....
--spelled c-r-a-s-s...
... to "invite himself"--especially to give a eulogy.
I know many if not most-- have instructions /wishes for their funeral services and memorial enfolded in their Will.
Perhaps "Stormin' Norman" left a little easter egg in his testament for the muzzie-in-chief.
We'll see.... in any case.
Happy New Year
32
posted on
12/28/2012 6:56:59 AM PST
by
Wings-n-Wind
(The main things are the plain things!)
To: lump in the melting pot
I’m guessing he doesn’t go to the funeral...but puts himself in a position to be asked about it on some late night television show. He will give a brief three sentence answer, in which he refers to himself 4 times.
33
posted on
12/28/2012 7:06:19 AM PST
by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: 2nd amendment mama
Back during Gulf I he was chooming and bathing. I wonder what analogy he will come up with to denigrate the General.
To: lump in the melting pot
Well it's not a given that Obama will give any eulogy at the General’s funeral and my guess is that the family will opt to have a private service much like Neil Armstrong's did and avoid all of the D.C. hypocritical pomp. And I hope this is the case.
To: Captain Peter Blood
I just wonder if Bush43 will attend in place of his ailing father, who was Schwartzkopf’s CinC. Also Cheney.
They ran a great team.
Except Powell who was JCS - he can go bugger himself
36
posted on
12/28/2012 7:36:25 AM PST
by
silverleaf
(Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
To: lump in the melting pot
37
posted on
12/28/2012 7:40:33 AM PST
by
MinuteGal
(I'm Going to Update the Name That No One Dares to Utter and I'll Use It From Now On......OBAMUNISM !)
To: EQAndyBuzz
I go with 17. Speech will be short, zero never liked him anyway.
38
posted on
12/28/2012 7:53:33 AM PST
by
CPT Clay
(Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
To: silverleaf
When we look back at the original Gulf War in 1990 exactly what was accomplished?
Just think of all the propaganda imposed on this country to justify going to war because Iraq invaded Kuwait.
Remember the tag line "Saving the world for democracy", or something like that and Kuwait certainly was not a Democracy under any circumstances. The real basis for going to war was to save Saudi Arabia from being invaded by Iraq and their oil fields from being taken over by Saddam.
Now given what we know now would really have been a bad thing? Saudi Arabia is the biggest financier or world wide terrorism and either directly or indirectly helped fund bin Laden and 9-11. Read Anthony Summers book, “The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11”, on this very interesting details not fully made public.
Perhaps if we had let Iraq take out Saudi Arabia a number of problems would have been solved not that a lot of new ones would have been created.
A lot of food for thought.
To: lump in the melting pot
Put me in for 45.
And I want to guess on how many times he'll refer to the 'common people' out here in the hinterlands as 'folks.' And he'll use his pseudo-Southern good old boy imitation twang to say it.
I will not listen either. Have to preserve what's left of my sanity.
40
posted on
12/28/2012 8:25:49 AM PST
by
JustaCowgirl
(Revolutions are not born out of success, they are born out of despair)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson