The vulgarity isn’t the problem. It’s the recycling of the left’s “reimagined history”. The blog post is an absurd compilation of Howard Zinn style material. Anyone who thinks that a stone-age culture would support 20-100 million Indians in North America hasn’t a clue.
What’s “reimagined”? How did Monk’s mound get there? There’s compelling evidence for everything the author stated. To say that there weren’t large, very complex societies in the Americas before 1492 is just denial.
Egypt was a stone age culture when the pyramids were built.
I dont have an issue with 20 million, Cahokia, Double Ditch and many other sites have shown that stone-age cultures did congregate in very large numbers. Now to try to prove a number like 100 million is in my educated opinion, just absurd. We would need to identify another 100 sites on the scale of Cahokia to even be certain of a number like 20 million.
100 million people scattered all over North America isn’t actually much, it’s a big 3 countries with a LOT of fertile land and tons of animals.