Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mhorseman
I'm more concerned with what will happen should Obama lose. Riots. I'm sure the brown shirts already have contingency plans to incite massive unrest. Since Obama will still be president, there will be nothing stopping him from declaring martial law and nullifying the election.
61 posted on 10/02/2012 3:43:15 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fatnotlazy
I'm more concerned with what will happen should Obama lose. Riots. I'm sure the brown shirts already have contingency plans to incite massive unrest. Since Obama will still be president, there will be nothing stopping him from declaring martial law and nullifying the election.

I think it's sad that you've lost sight of where the real power in America resides. Do you not realize that the reason you've enjoyed the relative 'good life', is only because the Framers enshrined the right to keep and bear arms in our Constitution?

Do you honestly believe that we'd even have the semblance of personal freedom in this country, if the powers that be had no fear of the people? What do you think restrains them from suppressing every natural right you have? Laws? Conscience?

Think again.

You've been beaten down, if you really believe a president could command and accomplish what you're suggesting. Not in this country.

78 posted on 10/02/2012 4:24:26 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: fatnotlazy
I'm more concerned with what will happen should Obama lose. Riots...[snip]...Since Obama will still be president, there will be nothing stopping him from declaring martial law and nullifying the election.
I beg to disagree. I think the "Martial Law" scenario in the USA in modern times is only possible in very limited locales (think Katrina and NOLA). A general martial-law scenario covering the US as a whole would never happen. Local Law Enforcement in likely 95%+ of the country would tell the feds to get stuffed because:
1. They lack the manpower to enforce it.
2. They lack the *will* to enforce it.

Even the military (as large as it is) would still be spread too thin over the entire country to have much of an effect *PRESUMING* the military would go along with it in the first place. Obama would need to have the loyalty of the military - enough to go along with such a blatant power-grab - and that alone is not believable.

So, I would put your fears of a general martial law to rest. About all Obama could do is attempt an Al Gore vote-challenge strategy to drag out the election and that only happens if the vote is virtually tied in a state(s) with enough electors to make a difference. Which, if you believe the polls, is more plausible.

85 posted on 10/02/2012 5:30:42 AM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: fatnotlazy

The Civil War and the election of 1864 answers that question!


89 posted on 10/02/2012 5:59:17 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson