Posted on 08/03/2012 4:19:35 PM PDT by agooga
Sadly, some will think you were referring to Obama.
You mean obama?
You didn't answer the question, why am I not surprised.
Later.
My kids are now 18 and 20. I used to create homeschool lessons from these posts.
If I tried to do that now, the only thing they would learn that the correct response to an argument is to tell people to go to hell and to ban them.
We’ve lost something wonderful.
It means a bonding of a man and a women. Government can not just change the definition of words by the use of law. The term of marriage is discriminatory. But words do change such as the word gay it was one of the most beautiful words in the English language. Discriminatory was also a very good word a long time ago, it meant choosy and refined.
But I would say government shouldn't be involved one way or another with what people do in private but they also can not use laws to change words.
I tried to teach some. I even would pose arguments just to encourage debate. I suppose we have had so many in the GOP-E, so many Romneyites and others, try to use such tactics to divide and conquer that debate has become suspect. I do not know the answer; I wish I did. There are some things Conservatives can disagree upon when both parties are still conservative. I do not believe that destroying the concept of marriage to appease a militant group of deviants is not one of those things.
Try listening to City on the Hill by Casting Crowns.
Naw, i meant Romney ~ he’s no different than Obama.
You just never know what a convention is going to do. At the moment my favorite candidate is Sewan Chung.
A conservative can’t be for gay marriage. It defies the definition of gay marriage.
I don’t hate queers and dykes. I pity them and pray for them to find peace.
I do hate the gay activists who constantly demand we approve and accept of homosexuality. I hate those bastards with a passion. I will never accept homosexuality as anything but a deviation.
I can well accept the possibility true homosexuals are wired for it and don’t choose it. There really seem to be a tiny portion of the population that is not attracted sexually to the opposite sex.
Assuming that is the case, these people are broken. They are not whole. They are deficient. They have an inborn deviation that should not be. To that extent, they deserve out love and understanding, but also counseling and support to reject and overcome their feelings.
Some people are born wired to behave with explosive violence. We don’t have activists calling for us to tolerate their “violent lifestyle”. These people overwhelmed with violent thoughts are broken, sick people and need help to live with their malady.
In much the same way, queers and dykes — real ones, not those experimenting with it because pop culture and insane liberals are pushing them to do so, or engaging it to be repulsive — they are broken sick people and need to seek help for their malady. We do them no good by codling them and accepting their sickness. The best thing we can do is disapprove of their sickness and then help them deal with it as best they can. NOT approve of it.
Further, the communist manifesto makes it quite clear that an integral means to destabilize the USA is to present homosexuality and all degeneracy as normal.
Being born a homosexual is a shame. Indulging in the sickness you were born with, rather than trying to treat the disease, is a degeneracy.
I don’t know if you are a troll or long-time conservative, but I can assure you, you are a willing dupe and tool of the communists when you advocate for “gay marriage”, which is an oxymoron anyway. Gays can’t marry. They can’t breed.
Marriage is the sacred union of two people who can mate and have children. They may choose not to have children, but marriage is the sacred union that allows two loving people to become one and create offspring.
Fags, queers, dykes and other LBGTXYZPDQs can’t have offspring. Ergo, they can’t marry. Even if America falls down the cliff of degeneracy so far that a law is eventually passed to allow them to marry, they still can’t marry in God’s eyes (not that I can or should speak for the Lord).
I knew when fags, queers, dykes and the other LBGTDV8s began their push for “rights” that they would never stop until they got the right to “marry”, have preference in hiring and have preference in adoption.
FWIW, I am not shamelessly ANTI-QUEER. They pushed me over the cliff recently in regard to their aggressive arrogance and now I want them all back in the closet where they belong. We let them out of the closet to live in peace, but it was’t enough for them to have equal rights to all else in the nation. They want PREFERENTIAL rights. They demand ACCEPTANCE.
Well I’m sick of them and I want all manner of faggotry to be stigmatized again, and back in the closet where it belongs.
I don’t hate LBGTDV8s. I pity them and hope and pray they come to terms with their disease and find peace in trying to overcome it, or at least resist it if they can’t overcome it.
I will NEVER ACCEPT IT. Never.
The consensus is you a clueless moron whoes hysteric emotion based political opinions are complete without a shred of rational merit
Bingo!
Awesome post.
Right on Marie!
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
You're wrong, it's not imprinted like being black or white. The evidence is that there are former gays while there are no former black people, no former white people. It's a behavioral choice.
I'm against gay "marraige" because I don't want my government to pretend that homosexuality is normal, and it's not normal. It's not normal for a member of any species to behave in such a manner that would cause the entire species to go extinct if done by large portions of the species population.
You are not conservative but a gay trying to pose as one so you can redirect the attention off the major gay fail kiss in. The world got to see what real assholes you are and the photos will be used against your cause for some time.
Your friends the liberals hate. That is what they do. Would your “friends” hate you if you did not agree with them? If so they are not your friends.
I will never accept liberals social engineering marriage and family out of existance and I will always warn young people to reject homosexual activity so they don’t die young and suffer being associated with psychopaths who hate, hate, hate.
Social Marxism is where this effort to destroy the family is born and do you know what Marxists do to Christians? They have murdered millions to cleanse humanity for their Utopia. So if you are a Christian, be careful with your “friends.” Don’t bring them around your Christian friends and expose them to murderous haters. You are hanging out with people that put Hitlers shock troops to shame in the mass murder department.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.