Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How can I filter out the giant catholic posts?
6-25-2012 | Self

Posted on 06/25/2012 2:27:39 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Can someone please help me figure out how I can block/filter out the catholic posts that have the huge long picture files?

When I browse latest posts or latest articles, there are some of these posts that contain huge long pictures etc that disrupt the flow of scanning titles for interesting reads.

I have nothing against Catholics, just spam.

Thanks


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catholic; filterthis; posts; spam; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-159 next last
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I agree. The whole browsing section is filled up. Why not just personal mail that stuff? I even PM’d one of the more egregious posters about it, but he didn’t take the hint. Hit abuse enough, I guess maybe something will be looked at.


81 posted on 06/25/2012 5:26:33 AM PDT by Safetgiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Maybe you should cut and paste one of the 50swipe-images onto this thread so those who filter the Latest Post page can experience the vertigo-like queasiness that accompanies the swiping. Please try not to double post though. Lol


82 posted on 06/25/2012 5:28:30 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

My suggestion would be to freepmail the posters themselves and ask them nicely please not to do that...It don’t work (MarK O’Malley).


83 posted on 06/25/2012 5:32:18 AM PDT by Safetgiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eartrumpet
I remember sitting through MiaT threads on dialup. Wow.

Boy Howdy! on a stick! Sometimes I think about writing a filter for Chrome, say any table longer than x with a sufficiency of monochromatic backgrounds that are not white.

And then I realize that I have better things to do and just bug News/Breaking for a while instead of Everything. Problems solved.

The Fool is always greater than
The Proof.

84 posted on 06/25/2012 5:32:56 AM PDT by Mycroft Holmes (<= Mash name for HTML Xampp PHP C JavaScript primer. Programming for everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Yeah, some of those Catholics are really, really big!


85 posted on 06/25/2012 5:32:56 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I think everyone has gotten the picture by now Dude. At this point I’m looking for a filter for you. You have now become obnoxious.


86 posted on 06/25/2012 5:34:16 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

There actually needs to be a viewing option that allows maybe the first 50 words of a post to be shown in the list without showing the entire post. I have nothing against long posts, but it’s considerably more difficult to scroll through the list to get to a topic of interest when many paragraphs of text and pictures are included. Especially when viewing on a smart phone where visual real estate is very limited.


87 posted on 06/25/2012 5:37:19 AM PDT by meyer (It's 1860 all over again - the taxpayer is the new "N" word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Catholic spam and Romney sycophants flooding FR; FReepathons are going to get longer and longer...


88 posted on 06/25/2012 5:37:39 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

> Maybe there should be a place on FR to archive lists of links on specific topics, and then you can just link to the appropriate archive when you need to. Just a thought.

I have a tendency to write excessively long posts myself (though usually original, and not as long as the ones that have annoyed some persons here). We can’t link directly to old posts, but when I research something carefully and write a post about it, I record the link to the thread page on which it appears. Then later, in related threads, I say something like “For more information about...see post number...in this thread [link to the old thread page].”


89 posted on 06/25/2012 5:39:43 AM PDT by GJones2 (Repeated long posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
You are only ‘forced’ to look at it if you open the post.

Don't like ‘em? Don't open ‘em.

And stop whining.

90 posted on 06/25/2012 5:55:47 AM PDT by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Don’t click on the post.


91 posted on 06/25/2012 5:57:06 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Romney - not Obama - not a Conservative - not a real Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GJones2
Actually, you can link to a particular post.
Instead of linking to to the page, use the URL for the post.
For example, the URL for your last post is http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2899075/posts?page=89#89
92 posted on 06/25/2012 6:01:03 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

Thanks! Now that you mention it, I notice that the address for ‘last’ has a # and post number in it. Usually I pay attention to that kind of thing, and I should have been able to figure that out. Thanks again.


93 posted on 06/25/2012 6:09:26 AM PDT by GJones2 (Links to posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

Glad to help!
:)


94 posted on 06/25/2012 6:12:08 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: GJones2
We can’t link directly to old posts
What do you mean? Posts in FR? After a certain time the links no longer point to the correct location, due to archiving?
95 posted on 06/25/2012 6:14:03 AM PDT by samtheman (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/21/obamas-socialist-designs/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.; Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Let me get this straight. You have nothing against Catholics, so sirree bob. You only object to giant graphic posts.

Well, then, why didn’t you write a screed against giant graphic posts? Why did you feel the need to insert that adjective?

The only giant graphic posts on FR ever under any circumstances are giant CATHOLIC posts??????

For someone who has nothing against Catholics, it’s a tad odd that you only notice giant graphic posts when their subject matter is Catholic.

Because they're essentially the only ones who post huge long graphic posts that can be classified as spam.

Stop being so easily offended. Sheesh.

96 posted on 06/25/2012 6:18:30 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: caver

Ping me, too. Same problem here.


97 posted on 06/25/2012 6:18:30 AM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: caver; Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Oops! Sorry, meant to ask Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh to ping me when he finds out how to filter those long posts out.


98 posted on 06/25/2012 6:20:27 AM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

“800-line screeds in ransom note typography”

Made me lol.

There’s also the occasional poster who thinks that random font face, color, and size changes, a la 1999 geocities websites, give their posts “personality”.


99 posted on 06/25/2012 6:21:06 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

From the *church which never changes*, eh?


100 posted on 06/25/2012 6:21:08 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson