Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[M]mysterious space plane to land after a YEAR in orbit - and no one knows what it did up there
dailymailuk ^ | : 09:12 EST, 4 June 2012 | Rob Waugh

Posted on 06/04/2012 6:03:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The U.S Air Force’s highly secret unmanned space plane will land in June - ending a year-long mission in orbit. The experimental Boeing X37-B has been circling Earth at 17,000 miles per hour and was due to land in California in December. It is now expected to land in mid to late June.

At launch, the space plane was accompanied by staff in biohazard suits, leading to speculation that there were radioactive components on board.

The men and women of Team Vandenberg are ready to execute safe landing operations anytime and at a moment's notice,' said Colonel Nina Armagno of the U.S. Air Force's Space Wing. The plane resembles a mini space shuttle and is the second to fly in space.

It was meant to land in March, but the mission of the X-37B orbital test vehicle was extended – for unknown reasons.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: boeing; nasa; spaceexploration; x37b
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: BenLurkin

And there is no truth to the rumor that the astronauts were mysteriously liquified inside their spacesuits by an extraterrestrial fungus.


61 posted on 06/04/2012 7:38:10 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It’s probably no coincidence that the USAF/NRO just “gifted” two brand-spanking new KH series satellites to NASA as Hubble replacements. USAF/NRO have probably determined that they have something much better ...


62 posted on 06/04/2012 7:40:11 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

What math?


63 posted on 06/04/2012 7:45:12 PM PDT by CodeToad (Homosexuals are homophobes. They insist on being called 'gay' instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
I can say it WILL land. well... maybe. It might crash. It might splash down in the ocean, it may burn up on reentry, it may end up in a tree.... They may loose control of it and it drifts off in to space...
64 posted on 06/04/2012 7:48:31 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

And find nothing inside. ;)


65 posted on 06/04/2012 7:48:33 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Velocity sub orbit equals the square root of the radius times the surface gravity sub orbit.

From my post at 50. I came up with 1.08(fiddlybits) radii for 17000 mph.

I was rather proud of that. Be a damn shame if I was dead wrong.

/johnny

66 posted on 06/04/2012 7:55:58 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
It won't drift off at 17000mph. It will land somewhere. And even if it gets stuck in a tree or burns to ash on re-entry and lands in your grandmother's wig.. It's coming back.

/johnny

67 posted on 06/04/2012 7:58:45 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Impressive ship. Looks similar to a shuttle.


68 posted on 06/04/2012 8:00:01 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
Yeah. v2/r = g(R/r)2, so v = sqrt( g R ) sqrt( R/r ).

sqrt( g R ) represents the speed of an orbit at distance R, or about 7901 m/sec = 17674 mph and the speed of higher orbits are lower by the second factor.

Then we require r/R =( 17674/17000 )2 ~= 1.08, giving an altitude of 0.08 R or about 317 miles .

69 posted on 06/04/2012 8:12:02 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Leave it to a cook to point this out, and I should have known it, being a zoomie.... it's not a circular orbit.

So all bets are off.

BTW, I find your math correct to an order of magnitude for a cirular orbit.

/johnny

70 posted on 06/04/2012 8:20:35 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Circular. I am also chasing a bit of FOD around the keyboard.


71 posted on 06/04/2012 8:22:46 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
... biohazard suits, ...

Considering the craft uses Kerosene and Hydrogen Peroxide for its propulsion, any Humans handling that stuff need biohazard suits. That ain't your 3% H2O2 Peroxide - closer to 70+%.

72 posted on 06/04/2012 8:23:00 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

The 1.08 ratio will apply to the semimajor axis of an elliptical orbit, which has to have pretty low eccentricity to stay clear of the atmosphere. For low eccentricity, the shape of the orbit is very nearly a circle with its center displaced from the center of the earth by 1/2 r*e ( r*e is the distance between the foci of the true elliptical shape. ) This means that the length of the orbit is very nearly that of a circular orbit, as calculated, and the calculated speed will be very nearly the average orbital speed.


73 posted on 06/04/2012 8:30:36 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

And “The One” ordered NASA to pursue “outreach to Muslim nations” as it primary mission.

NASA is no longer trustworthy.


74 posted on 06/04/2012 8:31:31 PM PDT by motor_racer (Pete, do you ever get tired, of the driving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
So, the area over time on any segment of the ellipsoid is the same.

And the time of the orbit is roughly the same whether circular or elliptical, given a fixed input of impulse.

I think I have that. Thank you.

/johnny

75 posted on 06/04/2012 8:37:52 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
BTW, feel free to harshly school me on math any chance you get. I did much better with other subjects and appreciate a free education.

/johnny

76 posted on 06/04/2012 8:41:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
And the time of the orbit is roughly the same whether circular or elliptical, given a fixed input of impulse.

The period of an orbit with semimajor axis r is exactly the same as a circular orbit with radius r. I was pointing out that for low eccentricity, the path length of the elliptical orbit is very close to that of the circular orbit, so the average speed is nearly the same, being nearly the same distance divided by exactly the same time.

77 posted on 06/04/2012 8:46:40 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
And while the average speed may be the same... the speed at perigee and apogee may be very divergent? For a highly eliptical orbit?

/johnny

78 posted on 06/04/2012 8:57:49 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: motor_racer

wasn’t it screwy Lewy who said a space ship would come take him away???

His test flight is complete.


79 posted on 06/04/2012 9:08:06 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Based on conservation of angular momentum, the speeds at apogee and perigee are related by vara = vprp, which gives vp/va = ( 1+e )/( 1-e ) ~= 1+2e, for small eccentricity. So the variation is considerable even in this case.

( The shape of the orbit varies from circular only to second order in e, i.e. e2. )

80 posted on 06/04/2012 9:41:08 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson