If not Romney, then .. who?

self ^ | April 30, 2012 | knarf

[knarf]

..and do we have the numbers and the clout to pull it off?

[Longbow1969]

Just because you couldn’t understand what I wrote doesn’t mean its gibberish, it just means you didn’t get it.

Perhaps you just can't defend your argument and tried to blur and obfuscate in order to hide that fact. I'm still waiting for your explanation as to exactly how virtually all these conservative leaders such as Cheney, Rush, Hannity, Levin, Palin, Newt, Bork, Bolton, etc, etc, are somehow "suppressing" or "suspending" reason. I wonder if at some point it will occur to you that maybe their reasoning is just fine and it is yours that is faulty.

[Oregon Coast Conservative]

Ooops, sorry for the hiccup, damn centurytel:)

[vmivol00]

They both have records supporting gun control, Planned Parenthood, government mandates, socialized healthcare, cap&trade, global warming, government bailouts, indexing minimum wage, raising taxes on the “rich”, gay marriage, etc.

The only real policy difference I see is in where they define the “rich” for tax policy. Obama sets the line at $250k, whereas Romney defines it at $200k.

I’ll vote for conservative candidates. I will not vote for socialism...even with an R behind it. In my mind, Romney and those who supported him are traitors to the conservative cause.

[netmilsmom]

>>I will not vote for socialism...even with an R behind it. <<

Then you vote for Marxism.
Did you miss where Obama told Putin to be patient until his “next election”?
Did you know that members of the Muslim Brotherhood are working in the administration on national security concerns?
Did you miss that two of our Supreme Court justices are getting up there in years? (ahem to be replace with Wise Latinas?)
How about the ‘Executive orders” skipping congress?
How about the Agencies like the EPA destroying lives?
Or the Justice Department looking away from “Fast and Furious” and the Black Pathers?

And you see no difference?

[driftdiver]

I live in Tampa. They are already trying to revoke conceal weapon laws and ban possession of a firearm. They are expecting a lot of occupiers. I’ll be there but don’t expect much.

[svcw]

Ooookay.....

[Tennessee Nana]

about 2,000 miles for me

I took my daughter, 14

She sang the National Anthem and God Bless America...

[caww]

Yes it is...funny Obama’s team trying to get it down ...I’ve seen others removed though, so am not surprised...I don’t think google is our friend as so often said.

[Private_Sector_Does_It_Better]

“If not Romney ... then Obama. Sorry to say.”

You nailed it. One of those two will be prez after inauguration day 2013. PERIOD. Some here think there is a third possible outcome; pure silliness.

Our options are to vote for one of them, or vote for a third candidate or don’t vote for this office. But regardless of which option you pick, either Obama or Romney will be the next prez.

[al_c]

If you allow Obama to be re-elected, you support a socialist.

[caww]

Thanks netmilsmom....someday I’ll take the time to put this stuff up myself...I ‘ve batted zero trying so far. Don’t have much patience with computers...ha!

I loved seeing our troops celebrate Bush being there....and their silence for Obama spoke volumes for sure.

Thanks again...

BTW I go to JustinTV so if you want let me know if you get it up.

CW

[Oregon Coast Conservative]

It was a special time, and a different America. I miss it.

[EternalVigilance]

If you allow Obama to be re-elected, you support a socialist.

By nominating their own pro-choice democrat socialist the Republicans have already ceded the election to Obama. Wake up.

[Private_Sector_Does_It_Better]

“This will be the last election (ok free election) if BO wins.”

“People said that about Clinton, and also Bush. Looking to history, the hysterical little girls who said that were retarded.”

I remember reading that nonsense here in the days leading up to GWB’s inauguration. “Clinton wil never leave, he’s going to declare Marshall law.” There’s some great people here, but some kooky tin foil hatters as well.

[Errant]

If you allow Obama to be re-elected, you support a socialist.

R-O-M-N-E-Y-C-A-R-E

[jy8z]

I don't "allow" anything with my vote. I vote my conscience. That's all I can do. Mitt Romney is another poor candidate for the GOP.

[caww]

There are only Romneybots and Obamabots now...

There's one more...Noneoftheabovebots Or NOA's

[al_c]

Obama care
No religious freedom
High gas prices
embryonic stem cell research
tax dollars for abortion
Tax dollars for birth control

Go ahead and support that if you want but I choose to use my vote on the best chance we have to overthrow this tyrant. One step at a time ... that’s the way I see it.

G’night now.

[vmivol00]

Nope...no difference. They are both liberal turds. oh...in case you didn’t know Romney’s record on appointing judges isn’t any better than Zero’s. In

By the way, save the Romneybot talking points for someone like yourself who easily caves to support anything with an R behind it. I don’t vacillate like Romney or the supposed “conservatives” who have whored out their integrity and principles to support a gun grabbing, socialism loving abortionist.

Although the Romneybots try to frame this election as a mutually exclusive event...that is just not the case. When did voting based principles become such a bad thing?

I’m a conservative first.

[caww]

By nominating their own pro-choice democrat socialist the Republicans have already ceded the election to Obama.

EV, I'm interested to know why you think Obama will win, other than the standard reasons we've heard. You've certainly been in this arena so I'd suspect you can see some of the plays before they happen.