Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Nice way to celebrate a centennial.


1 posted on 04/29/2012 8:00:13 AM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Daffynition
At the highest levels in Armonk they think things are going beautifully because they are out of touch with the reality of their own company.

That sounds strikingly familiar????

2 posted on 04/29/2012 8:05:07 AM PDT by bigheadfred (MY PET TAPEWORM (OBIWAN) IS AN INSANE MILITARY HATING LEFTIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Reduce their work force by 3/4? When did they announce this? How has it been kept so quiet?


3 posted on 04/29/2012 8:07:14 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
"The Downfall of IBM"

What? Again?!

I thought they went out of business a few decades back.

8 posted on 04/29/2012 8:15:41 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

It would be nice if the author had a clue ....

IBM Hardware Products are still amoung, if not, the best. The US Market has been tanking and there is no need to maintain the workforce where there is no demand. Asia is “growing” and so is the demand - thats why they are investing there.

Manufacturing of almost ALL computer products has been shifted to Asia, regardless of who (including the authors belove Apple!).

Programmers and Co in India aren’t top notch? THE MARKET DOES NOT CARE! They want cheap. It’s been that way for over a decade. And you get what you pay for.

Sales and Technicians? You need those where the customers are - and - THAT IS NOT in the US (or Europe) at the moment.


9 posted on 04/29/2012 8:15:52 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Global Services is IBM’s business now and they are struggling to renew their major contracts because their offshore competitors are now viable on that scale and can usually deliver high customer satisfaction, so IBM can’t renew their contracts at their current pricing structures and they have to find savings in their delivery.

Whether they can successfully reinvent themselves yet again and in that way is still to be seen, but I think the inefficient layers of administrative overhead and effective management of offshore delivery are more of issue than their shifting to a higher ratio of offshore labor.


11 posted on 04/29/2012 8:17:02 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

IBM: Technologies Graveyard.


12 posted on 04/29/2012 8:17:08 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
Oh, IBM ~ those guys. Used to program COBOL for a 360 mainframe. Learned JCL ~ worked with those systems up through the umpty-umpth release.

Then somebody came out with PCs and I never looked back.

Sitting here today in front of an Apple in fact.

Corporate folks went DEC then went Dell ~ for a variety of reasons America's then largest employer just didn't need IBM anymore, and neither did I.

The scent of death was on the land. Kodak went down last year. GM went down 5 years ago. Things change.

13 posted on 04/29/2012 8:17:12 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

“IBM seems to believe it is cheaper to replace a skilled worker with two or three unskilled workers to do the same job. That is like hiring nine women to make a baby in one month. While it looks good on paper it is not practical and is not working. The language barrier for IBM’s Indian staff is huge, for example. Troubleshooting, which was once performed on conference calls, is now done with instant messaging because the teams speak so poorly. Problems that an experienced person could fix in a few minutes are taking an army of folks an hour to fix. This is infuriating and alarming to IBM’s customers.”

ummmm, yes.

How about an experienced guy in the field (like me) who can fix it in minutes?
(No, I have never worked for IBM but that is the new paradigm across all of technology)


15 posted on 04/29/2012 8:17:52 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningfull to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Looks like they’re backing off. Trial balloon. Show across someone’s bow?

http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/opensource/224700807

IBM Denies Plan To Cut 75% Of Workforce

Big Blue dismisses report that it intends to replace three-quarters of its global staff with independent contractors.

By Paul McDougall InformationWeek


17 posted on 04/29/2012 8:20:11 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
The Downfall of IBM
Oh yeah, more companies should be suffering such a fate.


19 posted on 04/29/2012 8:21:02 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Boards are going to have to do a better job of picking CEOs. Anybody can talk a good fight about running a business. If we could sell talking, our country would own the world. Look at our President. He talks a good fight, but he’s inexperienced and dumber than donuts. Hire the best person for the big jobs. Hint - that is the person who will get the most effective and efficient use out of the resources.


21 posted on 04/29/2012 8:25:46 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
0bama can destroy even the best run enterprises.

26 posted on 04/29/2012 8:31:10 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
BetaNews.com ^ | April 27, 2012 | Robert X. Cringely
I don't know what IBM is planning, but I do know that Robert X. Cringely is not the reporter's real name - it's Mark Stephens.
He has a bit of a checkered past and perhaps a bias, axe to grind, shorted IBM ... who knows?
28 posted on 04/29/2012 8:32:14 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

BUMP


40 posted on 04/29/2012 9:13:40 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

This is not news to my family..........


42 posted on 04/29/2012 9:29:36 AM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition; bigheadfred; eeevil conservative; hoosiermama; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; ...
From this IBM stockholder's point of view, writer Cringley is just mouthing nothing more than the usual leftist diatribe against large corporations, which sounds swell to the MSM outlets that provide him with his bread. Wouldn't be surprised if he's offered a job by the Obama administration, which thinks along the same lines.

I happen to be pleased by what IBM has been doing: creating increasing value for its shareholders. Look at the stock price charts over the past few years and you'll see how IBM has been greatly outperforming the market in general, based primarily on its bottom line strategy. That's what a publicly held private corporation is there to do!

44 posted on 04/29/2012 9:35:40 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Make or perish is the future for American companies. Without creativeness they will eventually slowly twist in the wind.


52 posted on 04/29/2012 9:50:35 AM PDT by ex-snook ("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Bump for later


59 posted on 04/29/2012 10:09:51 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

IBM lost it completely when it ceded the consumer market to focus on what? While they still have a huge profit line, they are no longer a company that matters to consumers. Their name is not on everyone’s lips for innovation or design. Most people haven’t heard of them in years.

From the consumer point of view they sound more and more like “the world’s largest typewriter manufacturer.”


65 posted on 04/29/2012 10:30:20 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("God's light and God's life ooze over me like warm butter." -- Gay Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Ruh Ro.


70 posted on 04/29/2012 11:03:23 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson