Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bulwinkle

These two cases are in no way the same..below is a synopsis of the Rowan case.

Rowan gained public notoriety on June 14, 1988, when he shot a teenage trespasser, Neil Smith, who was on his property illegally. He was charged for firing a gun that he did not legally own. Rowan was arrested and tried. During the trial, he argued that he had the right to use whatever means necessary to protect himself and his family. Critics charged hypocrisy, since Rowan was a strict gun control advocate. In a 1981 column, he advocated “a law that says anyone found in possession of a handgun except a legitimate officer of the law goes to jail—period.” In 1985, he called for “A complete and universal federal ban on the sale, manufacture, importation and possession of handguns (except for authorized police and military personnel).” [4][5]


3 posted on 03/24/2012 4:00:14 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Recon Dad

Rowan’s a liberal, “down fr the struggle.” ‘nuff said.


4 posted on 03/24/2012 4:29:57 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Recon Dad

... it was a group teenagers pool hopping in Rowan’s back yard... Rowan thought one of them was approaching him and shot him. The Trayvon shooting is very similar... Zimmerman said Trayvon attacked him then shot him.


5 posted on 03/24/2012 4:34:22 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Recon Dad

And Rowan’s son was an FBI agent at the time and he had given his father the “illegal” firearm, which he used to defend his life and property.


32 posted on 03/24/2012 12:25:54 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson